NEURONICS: THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY
(WITHOUT PHYSICALITY)
1
In the alternate Earth where I am from, we use something called neuronics.
Neuronics is a way to influence neurons and other cells in the human body to change what you experience.
Any cell in a biological body can become a neuron, and any cell in the body can thus be influenced using neuronics.
It is like your electronics here, where devices are 'powered by neuronics'.
Read more at [link to ecsys.org]
In the electric field surrounding each cell there is 15 million volts of energy per meter, approximately 500% more than a bolt of lightning. (See [link to www.technologyreview.com] )
You use electronic devices to influence electrons in particular ways, and so we have devices that influence neurons.
You have televisions, alarm clocks, robots, computers, and other devices. We have an array of similar devices that we use to change our reality.
Most of you would call such technology teleportation, materialization/dematerialization, time-shifting and time travel, etc. We're not changing anything physically by using these devices, just changing perception.
(There is no physicality.)
Many of us in my world live non-physically. That is to say, we are not bound by physical constraints.
In this world, you're moving quickly towards this point.
Neuronics is one way to live as a human, but not live in a human body. (Strangely enough, your body is not human. It's more than 90% microbes.)
Neuronics is a way to influence neurons and other cells in the human body to change what you experience.
Any cell in a biological body can become a neuron, and any cell in the body can thus be influenced using neuronics.
It is like your electronics here, where devices are 'powered by neuronics'.
Read more at [link to ecsys.org]
In the electric field surrounding each cell there is 15 million volts of energy per meter, approximately 500% more than a bolt of lightning. (See [link to www.technologyreview.com] )
You use electronic devices to influence electrons in particular ways, and so we have devices that influence neurons.
You have televisions, alarm clocks, robots, computers, and other devices. We have an array of similar devices that we use to change our reality.
Most of you would call such technology teleportation, materialization/dematerialization, time-shifting and time travel, etc. We're not changing anything physically by using these devices, just changing perception.
(There is no physicality.)
Many of us in my world live non-physically. That is to say, we are not bound by physical constraints.
In this world, you're moving quickly towards this point.
Neuronics is one way to live as a human, but not live in a human body. (Strangely enough, your body is not human. It's more than 90% microbes.)
2
Neuronics is entirely within your mind.
If you use a physical means to influence something that is inherently non-physical the experience will be entirely different.
You will, in effect, not experience the non-physical but the properties of "x" itself. Your experience is a property of what you are using to experience it.
You are not, therefore, influencing your neurons. Your neurons are becoming “x”. If you are comfortable with this then by all means...
Yes, we are all from Earth ;)
If you use a physical means to influence something that is inherently non-physical the experience will be entirely different.
You will, in effect, not experience the non-physical but the properties of "x" itself. Your experience is a property of what you are using to experience it.
You are not, therefore, influencing your neurons. Your neurons are becoming “x”. If you are comfortable with this then by all means...
Yes, we are all from Earth ;)
3
Anything that has an electric field is intelligent, and DNA is indeed intelligent.
Intelligent beings communicate in their own language, I suppose. Some of us are like poetry.
How DNA follows the Ecsys model isn't too hard to figure out with some work, but making it obvious isn't really something that should be done right now.
Doubt alone about the value of the material keeps certain people from trying to figure it out. I don't want to give anyone an "aha" moment with regards to DNA at this time, so I left it our for now.
Let's just say there is some correlation. But it isn't useful at this time and is, thus, meaningless.
Intelligent beings communicate in their own language, I suppose. Some of us are like poetry.
How DNA follows the Ecsys model isn't too hard to figure out with some work, but making it obvious isn't really something that should be done right now.
Doubt alone about the value of the material keeps certain people from trying to figure it out. I don't want to give anyone an "aha" moment with regards to DNA at this time, so I left it our for now.
Let's just say there is some correlation. But it isn't useful at this time and is, thus, meaningless.
4
The old, legacy parts.
See here: [link to www.scientificamerican.com]
Many of these parts came from outside Earth, as people are beginning to understand.
There are actually several "humans genomes", not just one. (The intestines have their own genome, for example.)
Humans are becoming something else entirely.
i.e., what would be called non-human.
See here: [link to www.scientificamerican.com]
Many of these parts came from outside Earth, as people are beginning to understand.
There are actually several "humans genomes", not just one. (The intestines have their own genome, for example.)
Humans are becoming something else entirely.
i.e., what would be called non-human.
Also...
we used to be about 60% human.
We've been becoming less human for hundreds of thousands of years.
Now much less than 10%.
In the next 30 years or so, humans will no longer exist in their current form.
We will be non-physical beings.
More like a dream.
This is the 'great shift' that many have predicted and have read about.
we used to be about 60% human.
We've been becoming less human for hundreds of thousands of years.
Now much less than 10%.
In the next 30 years or so, humans will no longer exist in their current form.
We will be non-physical beings.
More like a dream.
This is the 'great shift' that many have predicted and have read about.
5
Your intent is illustrated in all 4 forces. It becomes your interpretation of the 4 forces into your reality.
Your intent would be in:
the symbols you pick
the way you allow your symbols to interact
the potential energy you use
the rules you set up
In effect, your new reality becomes a property of these things you have chosen.
Just like your current reality is an aggregate property of the symbols around you.
You are waking up on a tropical island.
You just don't realize it.
What you probably want to do is experience it with your waking mind.
It's possible to get to a point where you choose the kind of things you want to experience and/or to have control over your experiences.
The disconnect is in the symbols you are using.
That's it. It's the only thing. The symbols are the starting point to everything else.
Learn new symbols and you will have different experiences.
Learn the symbols of perception and you will be able to interface directly with your perception (a.k.a. changing your reality as you wish).
Use the Genius more and you will learn how to change your reality faster and faster when you learn how to create symbols on-the-fly (and interact with those symbols, etc).
By the way, dreams are just a different "flavor" of your perception.
The different flavors are the effect of using the different symbols.
Your intent would be in:
the symbols you pick
the way you allow your symbols to interact
the potential energy you use
the rules you set up
In effect, your new reality becomes a property of these things you have chosen.
Just like your current reality is an aggregate property of the symbols around you.
You are waking up on a tropical island.
You just don't realize it.
What you probably want to do is experience it with your waking mind.
It's possible to get to a point where you choose the kind of things you want to experience and/or to have control over your experiences.
The disconnect is in the symbols you are using.
That's it. It's the only thing. The symbols are the starting point to everything else.
Learn new symbols and you will have different experiences.
Learn the symbols of perception and you will be able to interface directly with your perception (a.k.a. changing your reality as you wish).
Use the Genius more and you will learn how to change your reality faster and faster when you learn how to create symbols on-the-fly (and interact with those symbols, etc).
By the way, dreams are just a different "flavor" of your perception.
The different flavors are the effect of using the different symbols.
6
Following up...
For example, it has been predicted that the coastal areas would be most affected by this shift.
Why is that? Does that mean a meteor from space or something?
No, it just means that the coastal areas are usually the most populated and areas.
These areas have more environmental changes than other areas.
This means that the rate of change will be faster in these areas than, say, the highlands of Kenya.
For example... the food you eat in the big cities is laced with additives such as chemicals and bacterial life forms.
These non-human compounds interact with your body, changing your body and making your bodyless human and more like the things you consume, breathe, think, etc.
We are, in effect, indirectly accelerating the rate of biological change by using technology.
Unfortunately, people are more concerned with recycling than with the effects of first-use.
(i.e., is it more important to recycle a can of coke or not drink it in the first place?)
This leaves us caring more about the environment than we do about ourselves and one-another.
Funny thing is, the Earth will be here long, long after we are gone. It repairs itself.
There's nothing wrong with this process, however. It's natural. We will become non-physical beings regardless.
For example, it has been predicted that the coastal areas would be most affected by this shift.
Why is that? Does that mean a meteor from space or something?
No, it just means that the coastal areas are usually the most populated and areas.
These areas have more environmental changes than other areas.
This means that the rate of change will be faster in these areas than, say, the highlands of Kenya.
For example... the food you eat in the big cities is laced with additives such as chemicals and bacterial life forms.
These non-human compounds interact with your body, changing your body and making your bodyless human and more like the things you consume, breathe, think, etc.
We are, in effect, indirectly accelerating the rate of biological change by using technology.
Unfortunately, people are more concerned with recycling than with the effects of first-use.
(i.e., is it more important to recycle a can of coke or not drink it in the first place?)
This leaves us caring more about the environment than we do about ourselves and one-another.
Funny thing is, the Earth will be here long, long after we are gone. It repairs itself.
There's nothing wrong with this process, however. It's natural. We will become non-physical beings regardless.
7
"1-Create symbol: Represent your desired thought, object, or experience physically."
You first must create a new symbol or use something that you've never before used.
(Create it physically or use something new.)
If you use your bed it already has its own meanings attached to it. The interactions would then be different because the symbol is different from what you want. (Meaning, you probably don't know what it symbolizes.) So therefore your experience will be different.
The best symbols are those which you create yourself because you are putting your intent behind the symbol, so to speak.
You first must create a new symbol or use something that you've never before used.
(Create it physically or use something new.)
If you use your bed it already has its own meanings attached to it. The interactions would then be different because the symbol is different from what you want. (Meaning, you probably don't know what it symbolizes.) So therefore your experience will be different.
The best symbols are those which you create yourself because you are putting your intent behind the symbol, so to speak.
8
Basically, we are not human.
"I" includes all these other life forms.
We think their thoughts and feel their feelings along with "ours".
The cells do not think of themcells as a single entity any more than your mouth does.
Your mouth has its own genome and would be considered 'conscious' but would not say "I" or "me".
Those terms (I, me) are our own ideas or interpretation of reality.
We perceive that which is most relative to us and say ."that is me".
The cells realize it is part of another whole (YOU) as much as realize that you are.
"I" includes all these other life forms.
We think their thoughts and feel their feelings along with "ours".
The cells do not think of themcells as a single entity any more than your mouth does.
Your mouth has its own genome and would be considered 'conscious' but would not say "I" or "me".
Those terms (I, me) are our own ideas or interpretation of reality.
We perceive that which is most relative to us and say ."that is me".
The cells realize it is part of another whole (YOU) as much as realize that you are.
9
You are already non-physical.
Physicality does not actually exist.
But to answer your question, the "I" will still be there. It'll just be a different you. You'll still remember your childhood and your favorite drink.
The difference is that your reality won't take as long to adapt to your thoughts.
Your reality will be as you want it to be. (The entirety of your wants, not just what you want at a particular moment.)
Physicality does not actually exist.
But to answer your question, the "I" will still be there. It'll just be a different you. You'll still remember your childhood and your favorite drink.
The difference is that your reality won't take as long to adapt to your thoughts.
Your reality will be as you want it to be. (The entirety of your wants, not just what you want at a particular moment.)
10
What is called the states of awareness is more like siblings of experience.
If you daydream about a childhood memory while sweeping the floor, for example, the two are deeply interconnected.
Technically-speaking the way you are sweeping (along with other conditions surrounding your activity) triggers the experience.
And vice-versa.
It's all about the 'geometry of relationships'.
Basically.. your world is filled with symbols. Two symbols together create consciousness and a reality. Change the 'proximity' of the symbols and you change the value of the relationship, which changes the experience and reality.
So you can experience two "states" at a time because the values of both are nearly the same.
When we are waking we are also dreaming at the same time. (We don't stop dreaming.) Our dream world directly correlates to the waking world but not at the same time. (For a graphical depiction of this see [link to ecsys.org] )
If you daydream about a childhood memory while sweeping the floor, for example, the two are deeply interconnected.
Technically-speaking the way you are sweeping (along with other conditions surrounding your activity) triggers the experience.
And vice-versa.
It's all about the 'geometry of relationships'.
Basically.. your world is filled with symbols. Two symbols together create consciousness and a reality. Change the 'proximity' of the symbols and you change the value of the relationship, which changes the experience and reality.
So you can experience two "states" at a time because the values of both are nearly the same.
When we are waking we are also dreaming at the same time. (We don't stop dreaming.) Our dream world directly correlates to the waking world but not at the same time. (For a graphical depiction of this see [link to ecsys.org] )
11
It could be that these "aliens" are actually human beings from Earth. But perhaps not in the sense that we are accustomed to.
There is physical proof of alien life forms all around us but it is ignored because it does not fit into the way science is currently performed.
Instead, we will look at an alien life form and its properties and give it a name like thermodynamics or the stratosphere or electrons.
We will then use an alien life form (electrons) to search for extra-terrestrials and then not find any. Too funny!
It seems that some in this world are actually searching for humans in recognizable form, not any real alien life.
There is physical proof of alien life forms all around us but it is ignored because it does not fit into the way science is currently performed.
Instead, we will look at an alien life form and its properties and give it a name like thermodynamics or the stratosphere or electrons.
We will then use an alien life form (electrons) to search for extra-terrestrials and then not find any. Too funny!
It seems that some in this world are actually searching for humans in recognizable form, not any real alien life.
12
More on "The Geometry of Relationships"
[link to ecsys.org]
Imagine a field of lines like in the blue graphic from the link above.
Each shape is a perspective or reality.
Each shape is comprised of other shapes. And each shape has a different relationship with every other shape.
Now imagine that another shape is born in the middle. This shape gets bigger and bigger and other shapes allow it to.
This growing shape can be thought of as an important event.
The more the event affects realities the greater the gravity of the event.
The event, thus, changes all the relationships around it because it changes the form of the other shapes.
Take 9/11, for example.
How were so many people around the world able to predict (see, envision, sense, whatever) this event before it happened?
The "shape" of 9/11 was massive. It still is. The shape affected our realities before the physical event.
This geometry of relationships precedes physicality because it actually is the physical experience.
[link to ecsys.org]
Imagine a field of lines like in the blue graphic from the link above.
Each shape is a perspective or reality.
Each shape is comprised of other shapes. And each shape has a different relationship with every other shape.
Now imagine that another shape is born in the middle. This shape gets bigger and bigger and other shapes allow it to.
This growing shape can be thought of as an important event.
The more the event affects realities the greater the gravity of the event.
The event, thus, changes all the relationships around it because it changes the form of the other shapes.
Take 9/11, for example.
How were so many people around the world able to predict (see, envision, sense, whatever) this event before it happened?
The "shape" of 9/11 was massive. It still is. The shape affected our realities before the physical event.
This geometry of relationships precedes physicality because it actually is the physical experience.
13
It's about the relationships, not the cells themselves.
The cells are just a mirror of the relationships. They're not actually physical things. We just represent them in our perception. (Although technically-speaking they do not exist until we perceive them.)
We will always have a limited mindset, as we cannot know of something beyond our own perspective.
We provide the physical constraints, not our bodies.
Our body is just a mirror of our perception.
The cells are just a mirror of the relationships. They're not actually physical things. We just represent them in our perception. (Although technically-speaking they do not exist until we perceive them.)
We will always have a limited mindset, as we cannot know of something beyond our own perspective.
We provide the physical constraints, not our bodies.
Our body is just a mirror of our perception.
14
Any energy comes from one thing relating to another thing. Put two things together and you have energy. The kind of energy, effect, and intensity depends on what those things are.
As long as we have perception we will always possess some kind of "body". A mind or body doesn't need to be supported by physically-oriented cells.
Thoughts do not come from cells. They come from the relationship between one thing and another thing. These relationships are constantly changing, and there is no end to the thought process.
As long as we have perception we will always possess some kind of "body". A mind or body doesn't need to be supported by physically-oriented cells.
Thoughts do not come from cells. They come from the relationship between one thing and another thing. These relationships are constantly changing, and there is no end to the thought process.
15
It is not so much that you are attached to something. What matters is what you're attached to.
If you're attached to the symbols in world A how can you perceive world B? It would be quite difficult. You would experience world B using symbols that you know about.
And so it is that way with dreams. We're falling off of a cliff or walking down a street when no such reality exists in our dreams.
If only the historical Buddha or Jesus clarified their statements about being attached to material things, then perhaps there'd be a greater understanding in general.
Our reality is comprised entirely of symbols. The symbols form relationships and that is what we perceive and experience. Change the symbols and you change your reality.
When you're looking at something this is more of what is actually seen. Your brain adds the narrative using bits and pieces it already knows about in order to conserve energy.
There is really only 1 world. It's called "perspective".
It's not so much that we're crossing from one world to another but that our world is changing.
When we dream, our world changes.
So, too, in the next few years this world changes.
The issue for you here, I think, is that you see a difference.
Realize there is no difference and find the corresponding symbols between the two world.
You can get there by what would be called embracing your entire set of symbols (including the ones you don't like). By resisting any part of your current perspective you are actually resisting the perspective you want. One is a map to the other.
It's not so much a test as just waiting for you to realize it.
The people from my world aren't really doing anything in this world. (There are too many Earths to count.) We're just people who have a different kind of technology that people in this world would find astounding. Most of this technology is non-physical because so many of us are non-physical and we can create things quite easily. For me it's more of a working holiday.
If you're attached to the symbols in world A how can you perceive world B? It would be quite difficult. You would experience world B using symbols that you know about.
And so it is that way with dreams. We're falling off of a cliff or walking down a street when no such reality exists in our dreams.
If only the historical Buddha or Jesus clarified their statements about being attached to material things, then perhaps there'd be a greater understanding in general.
Our reality is comprised entirely of symbols. The symbols form relationships and that is what we perceive and experience. Change the symbols and you change your reality.
When you're looking at something this is more of what is actually seen. Your brain adds the narrative using bits and pieces it already knows about in order to conserve energy.
There is really only 1 world. It's called "perspective".
It's not so much that we're crossing from one world to another but that our world is changing.
When we dream, our world changes.
So, too, in the next few years this world changes.
The issue for you here, I think, is that you see a difference.
Realize there is no difference and find the corresponding symbols between the two world.
You can get there by what would be called embracing your entire set of symbols (including the ones you don't like). By resisting any part of your current perspective you are actually resisting the perspective you want. One is a map to the other.
It's not so much a test as just waiting for you to realize it.
The people from my world aren't really doing anything in this world. (There are too many Earths to count.) We're just people who have a different kind of technology that people in this world would find astounding. Most of this technology is non-physical because so many of us are non-physical and we can create things quite easily. For me it's more of a working holiday.
16
The perception is entirely because of the total value of the relationships.
The perception is the reality.
However, if you resist something you're actually focusing on it which would probably mean that you're interacting more with it and create the kind of things that you don't want.
The perception is the reality.
However, if you resist something you're actually focusing on it which would probably mean that you're interacting more with it and create the kind of things that you don't want.
17
We are no more pure energy than you are. In fact, I can't begin to think of what pure energy might be.
We exist for the same reasons. To create relationships.
In this world I am human even though physicality doesn't actually exist.
We have both assumed human form and are part of the physical narrative.
We exist for the same reasons. To create relationships.
In this world I am human even though physicality doesn't actually exist.
We have both assumed human form and are part of the physical narrative.
18
It's "perspective"
No energy exists outside of your perspective, and no other dimensions need exist.
But if you were to count the number of different worlds you could travel to, there would be no end.
Not infinite (as infinity does not exist) but just beyond perception.
No energy exists outside of your perspective, and no other dimensions need exist.
But if you were to count the number of different worlds you could travel to, there would be no end.
Not infinite (as infinity does not exist) but just beyond perception.
19
When we put the icons together to make a statement they can either be as-is (not surrounded by anything), within a rectangle, or within a rounded rectangle depending on what it is used for. When used in some other technical ways then different shapes may be used, although those are the main 2 shapes.
The symbols themselves are always expressed like [link to ecsys.org] with linear forms.
The symbols themselves are always expressed like [link to ecsys.org] with linear forms.
When used as mental computers or for programming, each icon is like a logic gate to serve as an instruction (We can also network them together.) The outputs of an icon do not affect the input of the one previous.
When used for translation, each icon is like a definition. There are standard definitions and also you can have your own personal definition. (For example, if how you value a certain word or concept is different from the standard.)
When used for translation, each icon is like a definition. There are standard definitions and also you can have your own personal definition. (For example, if how you value a certain word or concept is different from the standard.)
20
Nothing fancy here.. the origin is your perception only.
An event is a collection of symbols. There is really no difference between what is called an event and a banana. It depends on how you look at something.
You can say that an event is where something is happening. But there is always something happening, even when things seem static.
The question is, how is what is happening affecting other things? (and how fast is it occurring relative to other things?)
For example, if a tree suddenly turns into a rock it may be called an event. But if it does it very slowly it is not called an event. Yet the same process is occurring.
An event is more like symbols that have lined up together from your perspective. (They may not be aligned from another perspective, however, and would thus not be called an event the same way you don't consider breathing a big event but other life forms do.)
Imagine you have a box made of symbols. There are symbols all around the box. At the corners of the box you have several symbols come together to make a kind of bridge to another group of symbols.
Each corner represents an event. The bigger the event the more points that meet the corner. So a large event would bring many different kinds of symbols together and form a bridge to each.
The 'big events' are just instances where the same process of creation happens (Ecsys Prime).
When these symbols share some of the same elements from your perspective (such as sharing the same structure or logic) then we have correlation and, thus, an event.
So for example one person walking down the street is not an event. But add 10 more people near each other and have then walk in step and you have an event. The more people that share the elements the "bigger" the event.
An event is a collection of symbols. There is really no difference between what is called an event and a banana. It depends on how you look at something.
You can say that an event is where something is happening. But there is always something happening, even when things seem static.
The question is, how is what is happening affecting other things? (and how fast is it occurring relative to other things?)
For example, if a tree suddenly turns into a rock it may be called an event. But if it does it very slowly it is not called an event. Yet the same process is occurring.
An event is more like symbols that have lined up together from your perspective. (They may not be aligned from another perspective, however, and would thus not be called an event the same way you don't consider breathing a big event but other life forms do.)
Imagine you have a box made of symbols. There are symbols all around the box. At the corners of the box you have several symbols come together to make a kind of bridge to another group of symbols.
Each corner represents an event. The bigger the event the more points that meet the corner. So a large event would bring many different kinds of symbols together and form a bridge to each.
The 'big events' are just instances where the same process of creation happens (Ecsys Prime).
When these symbols share some of the same elements from your perspective (such as sharing the same structure or logic) then we have correlation and, thus, an event.
So for example one person walking down the street is not an event. But add 10 more people near each other and have then walk in step and you have an event. The more people that share the elements the "bigger" the event.
21
Science fiction has been the primary cause of much of the technological progress of the last few centuries, and I think these types of devices are being worked on now.
The problem with discovering new technology, however, is that we tend to want to integrate old concepts into new ones.
Artificial intelligence, for example, is generally thought of a being a singular intelligence.
The AI of the future (most probably) is more like a piece of software with multiple personalities and various interfaces to physically express or interpret itself if it wants to. It is then given the freedom to create and destroy the various personalities as it sees fit.
Not sure how a direct neural interface in the next couple of years will work, but of the probable distant future (say, 5 years) it is manufactured on a molecular basis and integrated into physical objects and materials, for those who are not comfortable using more abstract methods.
A piece of granite kitchen counter-top, for example, is reconfigured to function within a network and act as a computing device and receive instructions via the network of which your brain is part.
It sounds fantastical, but you already have the technology. It's just a matter of putting the pieces together and mass producing it.
Closer than you realize.
The problem with discovering new technology, however, is that we tend to want to integrate old concepts into new ones.
Artificial intelligence, for example, is generally thought of a being a singular intelligence.
The AI of the future (most probably) is more like a piece of software with multiple personalities and various interfaces to physically express or interpret itself if it wants to. It is then given the freedom to create and destroy the various personalities as it sees fit.
Not sure how a direct neural interface in the next couple of years will work, but of the probable distant future (say, 5 years) it is manufactured on a molecular basis and integrated into physical objects and materials, for those who are not comfortable using more abstract methods.
A piece of granite kitchen counter-top, for example, is reconfigured to function within a network and act as a computing device and receive instructions via the network of which your brain is part.
It sounds fantastical, but you already have the technology. It's just a matter of putting the pieces together and mass producing it.
Closer than you realize.
22
A string of icons represents the perception. It is the code to the perception. If you know how to interpret the code (by understanding the values) then you can perceive what is behind the code.
Because EC is a type of interface with your perception the meaning of each symbol should be unique to you. You can share these "programs" with others for reference but it will probably work in a somewhat different way.
Use the Genius to achieve goals and EC to change your perspective.
The difference:
The Genius is like the map to the goal that automatically drives you to the destinations (when used).
EC re-maps your brain entirely so that you can perceive things differently.
Just imagine a world without spoken/written language and you're trying to tell the people about the benefits of using a spoken/written language.
Quite an impossible task, as you need the language in order to express the benefits.
Without English (or whatever) not only would you not understand much of what is going on you would perceive of reality in a completely different way.
It is because of language that we can perceive.
New language = new perceptions
Entirely new language = entirely new perceptions
The language of perception = limitless possibilities, because you are able to "control" what you perceive
Because EC is a type of interface with your perception the meaning of each symbol should be unique to you. You can share these "programs" with others for reference but it will probably work in a somewhat different way.
Use the Genius to achieve goals and EC to change your perspective.
The difference:
The Genius is like the map to the goal that automatically drives you to the destinations (when used).
EC re-maps your brain entirely so that you can perceive things differently.
Just imagine a world without spoken/written language and you're trying to tell the people about the benefits of using a spoken/written language.
Quite an impossible task, as you need the language in order to express the benefits.
Without English (or whatever) not only would you not understand much of what is going on you would perceive of reality in a completely different way.
It is because of language that we can perceive.
New language = new perceptions
Entirely new language = entirely new perceptions
The language of perception = limitless possibilities, because you are able to "control" what you perceive
23
I often hear people talk about how they believe that they create their own reality but don't see how they create what they think of as the negative things.
Perhaps they think when their body gets sick, somehow they did not make it so.
That when they stub their toe, somehow it was the object's fault or they simply didn't see it.
It's not that these things are created in their reality. Or that they create their reality. Nothing is really created. But everything is perceived.
Creation doesn't exist. We use these terms to reference some other process.
If we write a poem, for example, we're not creating something new. We're simply exploring relationships. The words were already there but it becomes relevant to us becausewe are creating a poem for ourselves.
When something new happens, it is the same thing. You are exploring a relationship. The elements were there already but you are in a way "seeing what happens" when you combine one thing with another thing.
It doesn't actually matter what you perceive, as long as you perceive something.
The idea is to "form relationships". However, the value of each relationship is not the same as the perception of it.
In this sense, at times it may be "better" to perceive of something you consider very bad than something very good.
You're looking at the shape of the relationship, not what your brain interprets the relationship to look like today.
What do we perceive? We perceive of things most relative to us in the here/now. Things not as relative to us are more distant in time/space.
So, your body is most relative to your perspective. So it seems that it's always following you around. Your toes are not as relative to your perspective as your nose and mouth are, and are further away in distance.
Your watch is sometimes relative to your perspective so you may only wear it sometimes.
Your workplace is less relative to your perspective, so it is even more distant.
And so on...
However, it is about the value rather than the perception. The place you grew up or went to school may be very relative to your current perspective but be distant in time space. But what you don't see is that the "shape" of your school or hometown isstill around you in a different form.
So, actually, when we are reading a scientific article about how we perceive we must ask ourselves, "What is it that we're doing?";
Are we reading an article or exploring our own values?
When we perceive of a distant object, is it that the photons from the object are hitting the cells in our eyes or that the distant object is us; a less-relative value in our perspective and we only interpret distance in such a way?
Perhaps they think when their body gets sick, somehow they did not make it so.
That when they stub their toe, somehow it was the object's fault or they simply didn't see it.
It's not that these things are created in their reality. Or that they create their reality. Nothing is really created. But everything is perceived.
Creation doesn't exist. We use these terms to reference some other process.
If we write a poem, for example, we're not creating something new. We're simply exploring relationships. The words were already there but it becomes relevant to us becausewe are creating a poem for ourselves.
When something new happens, it is the same thing. You are exploring a relationship. The elements were there already but you are in a way "seeing what happens" when you combine one thing with another thing.
It doesn't actually matter what you perceive, as long as you perceive something.
The idea is to "form relationships". However, the value of each relationship is not the same as the perception of it.
In this sense, at times it may be "better" to perceive of something you consider very bad than something very good.
You're looking at the shape of the relationship, not what your brain interprets the relationship to look like today.
What do we perceive? We perceive of things most relative to us in the here/now. Things not as relative to us are more distant in time/space.
So, your body is most relative to your perspective. So it seems that it's always following you around. Your toes are not as relative to your perspective as your nose and mouth are, and are further away in distance.
Your watch is sometimes relative to your perspective so you may only wear it sometimes.
Your workplace is less relative to your perspective, so it is even more distant.
And so on...
However, it is about the value rather than the perception. The place you grew up or went to school may be very relative to your current perspective but be distant in time space. But what you don't see is that the "shape" of your school or hometown isstill around you in a different form.
So, actually, when we are reading a scientific article about how we perceive we must ask ourselves, "What is it that we're doing?";
Are we reading an article or exploring our own values?
When we perceive of a distant object, is it that the photons from the object are hitting the cells in our eyes or that the distant object is us; a less-relative value in our perspective and we only interpret distance in such a way?
24
For example...
If you were to travel back in time 20 years and visit your relatives they would see you as being "alien". The world of 20 years ago is exceedingly different than the world of today, as are the cognitive processes that were used. (More accurately, the values you would need are very different. There's only you, and the illusion of traveling to the past.)
To yourself, you seem pretty darn human. But to them, you are a strange being with strange behaviours, perceptual abilities, thoughts, knowledge, understanding, tools, etc.
The brain picks up on all these signals and tries to filter them out while providing a composite of what it thinks you are.
Even though you think you remember what it was like 20 years ago, you actually have no idea. You may be in shock as to the difference between what you think of the past and more of what is actually there.
The past you remember is actually a value in your present.
Or, you could say, we re-interpret our past into our present perspective.
Similar to a human being being misinterpreted as an alien, we could say that past civilizations (like Ancient Egypt) are misinterpreted as being past civilizations.
The civilizations are still very much alive. They are shapes in our present reality.
Imagine that we could magically translate all of humanity into a sitcom on television show about cats. Anyone watching and understanding the show would see cats, but there would be a deeper meaning involved that would resonate with the viewers.
Now imagine an ancient civilization as our presentcivilization re-interpreted.
When we look at Ancient Egypt, for example, we are perceiving not a dead culture, technology, place, etc., but a value in the present.
Ancient Egypt, Rome, Maya, etc., are not in the past. They are in the present.
They are the present civilizations translated into different "languages" (for lack of a better term).
But because the shape is so different we think of them as being more distant in time/space, and thus appear ancient and strange (like you would to your previous self appear).
If you were to travel back in time 20 years and visit your relatives they would see you as being "alien". The world of 20 years ago is exceedingly different than the world of today, as are the cognitive processes that were used. (More accurately, the values you would need are very different. There's only you, and the illusion of traveling to the past.)
To yourself, you seem pretty darn human. But to them, you are a strange being with strange behaviours, perceptual abilities, thoughts, knowledge, understanding, tools, etc.
The brain picks up on all these signals and tries to filter them out while providing a composite of what it thinks you are.
Even though you think you remember what it was like 20 years ago, you actually have no idea. You may be in shock as to the difference between what you think of the past and more of what is actually there.
The past you remember is actually a value in your present.
Or, you could say, we re-interpret our past into our present perspective.
Similar to a human being being misinterpreted as an alien, we could say that past civilizations (like Ancient Egypt) are misinterpreted as being past civilizations.
The civilizations are still very much alive. They are shapes in our present reality.
Imagine that we could magically translate all of humanity into a sitcom on television show about cats. Anyone watching and understanding the show would see cats, but there would be a deeper meaning involved that would resonate with the viewers.
Now imagine an ancient civilization as our presentcivilization re-interpreted.
When we look at Ancient Egypt, for example, we are perceiving not a dead culture, technology, place, etc., but a value in the present.
Ancient Egypt, Rome, Maya, etc., are not in the past. They are in the present.
They are the present civilizations translated into different "languages" (for lack of a better term).
But because the shape is so different we think of them as being more distant in time/space, and thus appear ancient and strange (like you would to your previous self appear).
25
Perceptions are feelings.
The most-relative parts of you may not feel these things because the less-relative parts already express these feelings.
They're still your perceptions, even if you don't agree with them.
You don't need to feel it, as other 'parts of you' are feeling it for you.
We cannot help but resist things, and this is completely natural. We need to resist.
(Actually, we resist everything in order to exist. But that's a different discussion entirely.)
Something could have a minimal effect on the most-relative-you but have a larger effect on the least-relative-you.
It's all a matter of perspective :)
It only really matters when we think of some things as bad and others good, etc. Meaning, we don't care when the "big event" is a new technology even when it has a greater effect on the way we live.
9/11 is actually no more important than 5/2 or the cookies in the cabinet. It has no extra value by itself. What matters is how a certain thing changes the values of other things, like a stone dropping in water.
And these things would have changed their value regardless of whether or not a particular event happened. Meaning, it is not 9/11 that brought about the experience of 9/11. (There was no stone dropping in the water. The waves in the water aligned in such a way that the illusion of the stone was dropped. It is our mind that fills in the blank and shows us the stone. To stretch your mind even further, it is our mind that fills in the blank and shows us the water.)
Meaning, 9/11 would have happened even if 9/11 didn't happen. And for this, we have reached the edge of the English language :)
The most-relative parts of you may not feel these things because the less-relative parts already express these feelings.
They're still your perceptions, even if you don't agree with them.
You don't need to feel it, as other 'parts of you' are feeling it for you.
We cannot help but resist things, and this is completely natural. We need to resist.
(Actually, we resist everything in order to exist. But that's a different discussion entirely.)
Something could have a minimal effect on the most-relative-you but have a larger effect on the least-relative-you.
It's all a matter of perspective :)
It only really matters when we think of some things as bad and others good, etc. Meaning, we don't care when the "big event" is a new technology even when it has a greater effect on the way we live.
9/11 is actually no more important than 5/2 or the cookies in the cabinet. It has no extra value by itself. What matters is how a certain thing changes the values of other things, like a stone dropping in water.
And these things would have changed their value regardless of whether or not a particular event happened. Meaning, it is not 9/11 that brought about the experience of 9/11. (There was no stone dropping in the water. The waves in the water aligned in such a way that the illusion of the stone was dropped. It is our mind that fills in the blank and shows us the stone. To stretch your mind even further, it is our mind that fills in the blank and shows us the water.)
Meaning, 9/11 would have happened even if 9/11 didn't happen. And for this, we have reached the edge of the English language :)
26
How is it that we can perceive things that we do not agree with?
Let's take an example.
Why is it that you are doing Xie right now?
You probably don't know what I'm talking about because there is nothing to support Xie in this world.
When we have something that defines Xie then we can imagine all kinds of activities surrounding Xie. Good stuff, bad stuff, etc.
Further:
without the idea of time the would be no clocks, as we could not imagine the usefulness of such a device.
without the idea of law enforcement there would be no one breaking the laws, because no one could imagine how the laws could be broken.
without the idea of certain religions there would be no sins, because no one could imagine how to sin as "sin" would not be defined.
A clock depends on time, a criminal depends on the law, sin depends on its religion, etc.
However, the opposite is also true. The existence of time depends on time-keeping mechanisms. The law depends on criminals to define it. Religion depends on sin and other aspects of its use in order that it may exist.
Each needs the other in order that it may be defined.
If you were to create a world from scratch and place in it only the "good" things then eventually some of those good things would then turn "bad" in your perception because you need a way to perceive of other things, i.e., to create relationships.
So, we are left with intentionally disagreeing with the things we perceive in order to define the things we do agree with.
[Note: The above is a very simplified explanation of the dependencies of perception. There are a multitude of other factors at play, but the idea is the same.]
Let's take an example.
Why is it that you are doing Xie right now?
You probably don't know what I'm talking about because there is nothing to support Xie in this world.
When we have something that defines Xie then we can imagine all kinds of activities surrounding Xie. Good stuff, bad stuff, etc.
Further:
without the idea of time the would be no clocks, as we could not imagine the usefulness of such a device.
without the idea of law enforcement there would be no one breaking the laws, because no one could imagine how the laws could be broken.
without the idea of certain religions there would be no sins, because no one could imagine how to sin as "sin" would not be defined.
A clock depends on time, a criminal depends on the law, sin depends on its religion, etc.
However, the opposite is also true. The existence of time depends on time-keeping mechanisms. The law depends on criminals to define it. Religion depends on sin and other aspects of its use in order that it may exist.
Each needs the other in order that it may be defined.
If you were to create a world from scratch and place in it only the "good" things then eventually some of those good things would then turn "bad" in your perception because you need a way to perceive of other things, i.e., to create relationships.
So, we are left with intentionally disagreeing with the things we perceive in order to define the things we do agree with.
[Note: The above is a very simplified explanation of the dependencies of perception. There are a multitude of other factors at play, but the idea is the same.]
27
When we feel something it is not independent from our perspective, it is because of it.
We cannot choose to feel sad in an instant, for example. We must first change the 'geometry of relationships' by doing or thinking of something that reflects this property.
Everything that exists does so within your perception, including thoughts, feelings, people, events, etc. These things are the perceptions.
Physically expressed it could be one chemical in relation to an other, or two objects placed in a certain way. But it's all about the non-physical relationships.
We cannot choose to feel sad in an instant, for example. We must first change the 'geometry of relationships' by doing or thinking of something that reflects this property.
Everything that exists does so within your perception, including thoughts, feelings, people, events, etc. These things are the perceptions.
Physically expressed it could be one chemical in relation to an other, or two objects placed in a certain way. But it's all about the non-physical relationships.
The easiest way to become non-physical (or, more accurately, to remember that you are not actually bound to physicality) is to practice what we call the Code of Ecsys.
There are 4 codes:
Code of ThohT
Make your thoughts and desires physical in a small way. Symbolize your internal reality in your physical reality.
This means making use of the Genius: [link to ecsys.org]
No need to start out doing this every day. At first, try it once. Then see if you can understand how it works. A few days later, try it again.
The point of this exercise is to slowly show yourself how you come to experience your reality.
Code of Chaos
Be honest with the people and things around you. The more transparent you are the more you are connecting with your perceptions.
You're not fooling your perceptions! The more honest you are with your own perceptions the quicker you can peer through the veil of reality to see how it really is.
When you are dishonest with the things, places, people, etc, you perceive you are being dishonest with your own perceptions. Meaning, you are hiding from yourself. So then you don't actually want to see how things are.
The point of this exercise is to realize that you are the same as what you perceive.
Code of Kosmosis
Explore what is outside of your usual perspective. Do things you would not ordinarily do.
Your reality fits your definition of it.
If you say you are X and X is how things happen, then your perspective will grow into it as your re-inforcing views take shape.
Get out of your shell! Redefine your reality by being flexible not only about who and what you are but the world around you.
When you open your mind to different possibilities you are expanding your perspective. Essentially you are slowly adopting the view that anything could be anything. The things you perceive become more unified and start to hold the same values.. it all becomes one thing: your perception.
The point of this exercise is to realize that everything is in everything else.
Code of Orbia
Respect the logic of others. Try to understand whatever you resist. Exercise 'unlogic' by asking yourself, “How could I be wrong?”
Things that many of us don't want to do: see the other side of the coin about our strongest beliefs.
Start small. Make a list of some things you believe and try to see it for its opposite.
This is not to say that you should start believing in the opposite of whatever your beliefs are. See the logic of the things you don't believe in. If may not make sense to you but it makes sense to somebody.
Then ask yourself how you could be wrong about the things you believe in. Start small and work your way up to your core beliefs.
The point of this exercise is to understand that there is not just one kind of logic or right answer. There are no right answers. Each answer is perfectly attuned to its complete environment, including your own answers and closely-held beliefs.
1+1 is not "2". It is irrelevant. It only matters when we value "1" in a particular way and see the world in a particular way.
Does this mean that bad things are good? No, it means that the question or good and bad are irrelevant when we don't know how something really is.
It's all your perception. If some of your perceptions are good while others are bad then it is difficult to see your reality as a single perspective.
There are 4 codes:
Code of ThohT
Make your thoughts and desires physical in a small way. Symbolize your internal reality in your physical reality.
This means making use of the Genius: [link to ecsys.org]
No need to start out doing this every day. At first, try it once. Then see if you can understand how it works. A few days later, try it again.
The point of this exercise is to slowly show yourself how you come to experience your reality.
Code of Chaos
Be honest with the people and things around you. The more transparent you are the more you are connecting with your perceptions.
You're not fooling your perceptions! The more honest you are with your own perceptions the quicker you can peer through the veil of reality to see how it really is.
When you are dishonest with the things, places, people, etc, you perceive you are being dishonest with your own perceptions. Meaning, you are hiding from yourself. So then you don't actually want to see how things are.
The point of this exercise is to realize that you are the same as what you perceive.
Code of Kosmosis
Explore what is outside of your usual perspective. Do things you would not ordinarily do.
Your reality fits your definition of it.
If you say you are X and X is how things happen, then your perspective will grow into it as your re-inforcing views take shape.
Get out of your shell! Redefine your reality by being flexible not only about who and what you are but the world around you.
When you open your mind to different possibilities you are expanding your perspective. Essentially you are slowly adopting the view that anything could be anything. The things you perceive become more unified and start to hold the same values.. it all becomes one thing: your perception.
The point of this exercise is to realize that everything is in everything else.
Code of Orbia
Respect the logic of others. Try to understand whatever you resist. Exercise 'unlogic' by asking yourself, “How could I be wrong?”
Things that many of us don't want to do: see the other side of the coin about our strongest beliefs.
Start small. Make a list of some things you believe and try to see it for its opposite.
This is not to say that you should start believing in the opposite of whatever your beliefs are. See the logic of the things you don't believe in. If may not make sense to you but it makes sense to somebody.
Then ask yourself how you could be wrong about the things you believe in. Start small and work your way up to your core beliefs.
The point of this exercise is to understand that there is not just one kind of logic or right answer. There are no right answers. Each answer is perfectly attuned to its complete environment, including your own answers and closely-held beliefs.
1+1 is not "2". It is irrelevant. It only matters when we value "1" in a particular way and see the world in a particular way.
Does this mean that bad things are good? No, it means that the question or good and bad are irrelevant when we don't know how something really is.
It's all your perception. If some of your perceptions are good while others are bad then it is difficult to see your reality as a single perspective.
28
We have a different idea of physicality. One that is more flexible than being confined to a seemingly-organic form.
We are not part of a singularity or singular thing any more than you are. We are individuals who have forms and bodies, although
In the world I am from most of us maintain our physical form and don't really care about being non-physical. Physicality is an illusion and it is a fine illusion serving a purpose.
However, some of us (myself included) live with more awareness that we are not confined to our physical forms.
I came here because I thought it would be interesting to experience this change taking place, where some people "consciously" become non-physical (or, more accurately, realize that they weren't physical to begin with and exercise control over what form they take and how they experience things).
We need not be housed in anything (vehicle, body, etc) when we are assuming a non-physical form. It is more about relativity. For example, a particular frequency of light could be considered a type of individual consciousness even though it is intimately connected with others.
Not much different from how you are now.
The only difference is that we're more aware of it and we make more use of this understanding. While I am in this Earth for other reasons, I've decided to give some information on how to assume non-physical form (and keep it) the same way you do every time you sleep.
You are actually fluctuating between different forms as you read this but you're not aware of it.
We are not part of a singularity or singular thing any more than you are. We are individuals who have forms and bodies, although
In the world I am from most of us maintain our physical form and don't really care about being non-physical. Physicality is an illusion and it is a fine illusion serving a purpose.
However, some of us (myself included) live with more awareness that we are not confined to our physical forms.
I came here because I thought it would be interesting to experience this change taking place, where some people "consciously" become non-physical (or, more accurately, realize that they weren't physical to begin with and exercise control over what form they take and how they experience things).
We need not be housed in anything (vehicle, body, etc) when we are assuming a non-physical form. It is more about relativity. For example, a particular frequency of light could be considered a type of individual consciousness even though it is intimately connected with others.
Not much different from how you are now.
The only difference is that we're more aware of it and we make more use of this understanding. While I am in this Earth for other reasons, I've decided to give some information on how to assume non-physical form (and keep it) the same way you do every time you sleep.
You are actually fluctuating between different forms as you read this but you're not aware of it.
29
The rate of technological change here is accelerating, not remaining static or decreasing.
For example, tools that took 1,000,000 years to evolve before now take mere seconds.
What takes 1 year to do in 2010 will take mere days in 2011.
2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and beyond will be completely unrecognizable from today.
"True" artificial intelligence and many technologies science says is 50-100 years away exists in a few years.
Here, people see the future from the present perspective.
For example, just 10 years ago it would have been quite difficult to think that much of what is happening in the world in 2010 was even possible, much less a way of life.
Just last year, who would have imagined that sexual assault at airports would be accepted? Imagine such a thing happening on street corners, libraries, shopping malls, at random. Imagine airports being locked down for hours or days at a time while everyone is searched and that this is a way of life.
Physical neuronic devices will not be successful until well after non-physical ones are. (Imagine the possibilities with businesses and government.)
For example, tools that took 1,000,000 years to evolve before now take mere seconds.
What takes 1 year to do in 2010 will take mere days in 2011.
2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and beyond will be completely unrecognizable from today.
"True" artificial intelligence and many technologies science says is 50-100 years away exists in a few years.
Here, people see the future from the present perspective.
For example, just 10 years ago it would have been quite difficult to think that much of what is happening in the world in 2010 was even possible, much less a way of life.
Just last year, who would have imagined that sexual assault at airports would be accepted? Imagine such a thing happening on street corners, libraries, shopping malls, at random. Imagine airports being locked down for hours or days at a time while everyone is searched and that this is a way of life.
Physical neuronic devices will not be successful until well after non-physical ones are. (Imagine the possibilities with businesses and government.)
30
There are no symbol outputs because the whole process is a symbol output, per Ecsys Prime (near the bottom of the Ecsys home page):
Symbol = logic(possibility2-possibility)+interaction
You're not outputting a reality. You're influencing the relationships that allow you to perceive the reality.
However, Ec is more for changing how you perceive reality, like mapping new neuronal pathways in your brain.
You can get to a very specific perception using Ec but that's quite an advanced use. It would be similar to teleportation (though it is not really) and using Ec as both the programming language and the address to where you're going.
The best way for now is to use the Genius if you want specific perceptions to 'materialize'.
For example: We can use the Genius to materialize a glass of milk in your reality. We can use Ec to experience one of an endless variety of ~(glassess)~(of)~(milk) because we are exploring glass/of/milk possibilities.
Symbol = logic(possibility2-possibility)+interaction
You're not outputting a reality. You're influencing the relationships that allow you to perceive the reality.
However, Ec is more for changing how you perceive reality, like mapping new neuronal pathways in your brain.
You can get to a very specific perception using Ec but that's quite an advanced use. It would be similar to teleportation (though it is not really) and using Ec as both the programming language and the address to where you're going.
The best way for now is to use the Genius if you want specific perceptions to 'materialize'.
For example: We can use the Genius to materialize a glass of milk in your reality. We can use Ec to experience one of an endless variety of ~(glassess)~(of)~(milk) because we are exploring glass/of/milk possibilities.
31
Forgive the long explanation, but it is quite difficult to express this in words. Maybe you will need the former, above, first and the latter last after reading this jibba jabba.
Physicality is constricted by time, among other things. Time is partially the experience of our neurons firing. They fire fairly slow, at about 200 cycles per second. A different cycle would mean a different experience of time (and space).
Time is an illusion of the relationship of neurons, and physicality is as well.
Dreams are independent of this kind of time and have flexibility to show up 'anytime' it wants.
Imagine each moment like rooms in an infinite house. You think you must go in order, from the first room to the next. But this is only because you're using your feet. It takes a nanosecond to jump between rooms, and so this is your experience of time.
Dreams can show up in any room because it uses light instead of feet (as an example). So, dream-time is more flexible than physical-time.
You only think you need feet because you don't see any other way to walk to the next room.
What you don't realize is that you don't need to walk to the rooms, you can 'fly'.
Particles don't actually travel anywhere. They only seem to travel because this is what we expect (i.e., how we have set up our perspective).
A perceived thing takes on the same properties as the value of that which is used in the perception. We perceive time as it is because this is the property we have ascribed to the neuron.
So, in this way, a photon does not travel from the Sun to our eyes. The photon is a property of the cells, not a property of the sun. The cells themselves do not actually exist, either. They're just a way to translate experience from one dimension to another, so to speak.
So, the sun is a possibility in the cell. The cell is a possibility in your body. Your body is a possibility in your perspective, etc.
In the same way, for example, the Great Pyramid of Gizeh has always looked (and will always look) the way it does now. The way it 'has' looked or 'will' look is a possibility. If you were looking at it now it would be accurate to say that it was always corroded. Because you are not looking at it now it is accurate to say that it does not exist, but is a possibility within the current perspective.
Scientists here will figure out in a couple of years that the past, present, and future are possibilities (representations) of something that does not actually exist.
Apologies if the above is not clear.
Physicality is constricted by time, among other things. Time is partially the experience of our neurons firing. They fire fairly slow, at about 200 cycles per second. A different cycle would mean a different experience of time (and space).
Time is an illusion of the relationship of neurons, and physicality is as well.
Dreams are independent of this kind of time and have flexibility to show up 'anytime' it wants.
Imagine each moment like rooms in an infinite house. You think you must go in order, from the first room to the next. But this is only because you're using your feet. It takes a nanosecond to jump between rooms, and so this is your experience of time.
Dreams can show up in any room because it uses light instead of feet (as an example). So, dream-time is more flexible than physical-time.
You only think you need feet because you don't see any other way to walk to the next room.
What you don't realize is that you don't need to walk to the rooms, you can 'fly'.
Particles don't actually travel anywhere. They only seem to travel because this is what we expect (i.e., how we have set up our perspective).
A perceived thing takes on the same properties as the value of that which is used in the perception. We perceive time as it is because this is the property we have ascribed to the neuron.
So, in this way, a photon does not travel from the Sun to our eyes. The photon is a property of the cells, not a property of the sun. The cells themselves do not actually exist, either. They're just a way to translate experience from one dimension to another, so to speak.
So, the sun is a possibility in the cell. The cell is a possibility in your body. Your body is a possibility in your perspective, etc.
In the same way, for example, the Great Pyramid of Gizeh has always looked (and will always look) the way it does now. The way it 'has' looked or 'will' look is a possibility. If you were looking at it now it would be accurate to say that it was always corroded. Because you are not looking at it now it is accurate to say that it does not exist, but is a possibility within the current perspective.
Scientists here will figure out in a couple of years that the past, present, and future are possibilities (representations) of something that does not actually exist.
Apologies if the above is not clear.
32
Ec works differently than other natural languages because of how it can be used. It is a very personal language because it has to do with perception.
If I point to a glass and say "de sticlă" then you can map one concept in your mind ("glass") to a new concept in Romanian ("de sticlă").
However, in Ec, you are talking about possibilities for the glass. You can talk about a glass in general or a very specific glass (like the short, transparent glass half-filled with orange juice sitting on the left side of the kitchen counter at 4pm on Sunday the 5th of January).
The level of depth is up to you.
But the deeper you go, the less others would understand your own "word" in Ec because they cannot see exactly what you are perceiving.
Using Ec for the first time is just like using a new computer for the first time. You have the basics but nothing else. You can use it but it becomes much more useful when you personalize it.
Meaning, you can translate the word 'glass' into Ec but it is really only useful when you translate 'glass' into your own definition of it in Ec (i.e., your own perspective)
Try this, to begin:
Pick a couple of Ec numbers/values to learn
0 - mu
1 - unu
2 - dua
3 - sun
4 - tatat
5 - wu
6 - sumi
7 - naru
8 - bu
9 - ta
(continuous) - kata
(changing) - booba
from this list, pick out 2-3 numbers and remember them.
Map your brain
When you see three things together, say "sun", for example.
For added bonus, think of the symbol for it.
What you are doing here is re-mapping your brain. I believe that this is where the difficulty is in understanding how Ec works. It is difficult to see how this mapping occurs, but it is how the brain works.
How does it work?
When we map one concept to another and use it then it will become more obvious how Ec can be used.
(Using it is the important part)
Quite difficult to explain, but by using Ec you are thinking in the language of perception.
Eventually, you will be able to teleport to a very specific location that you have defined in Ec by simply repeating the symbols and thinking of their values. (It's more reality-shifting than teleportation, but you get the idea.)
It is like putting the latitude and longitude coordinates into a vehicle and being driven there. Except you are interfacing directly with your perception rather than a vehicle.
By using Ec you are programming your perception. Ec is the software and your brain is the hardware, so to speak.
This is all quite new to everyone, I know. But it takes some time to understand and to get to the point where you are in control of what you perceive.
Baby steps is best, but I think the above is a good start.
"Mu" is the difference between one and another. The 'space', between two things.
(For the symbol, its input is high possibility and output is neutral possibility.)
"Mu" could be anything because it is nothing in particular. It represents possibility.
If I point to a glass and say "de sticlă" then you can map one concept in your mind ("glass") to a new concept in Romanian ("de sticlă").
However, in Ec, you are talking about possibilities for the glass. You can talk about a glass in general or a very specific glass (like the short, transparent glass half-filled with orange juice sitting on the left side of the kitchen counter at 4pm on Sunday the 5th of January).
The level of depth is up to you.
But the deeper you go, the less others would understand your own "word" in Ec because they cannot see exactly what you are perceiving.
Using Ec for the first time is just like using a new computer for the first time. You have the basics but nothing else. You can use it but it becomes much more useful when you personalize it.
Meaning, you can translate the word 'glass' into Ec but it is really only useful when you translate 'glass' into your own definition of it in Ec (i.e., your own perspective)
Try this, to begin:
Pick a couple of Ec numbers/values to learn
0 - mu
1 - unu
2 - dua
3 - sun
4 - tatat
5 - wu
6 - sumi
7 - naru
8 - bu
9 - ta
(continuous) - kata
(changing) - booba
from this list, pick out 2-3 numbers and remember them.
Map your brain
When you see three things together, say "sun", for example.
For added bonus, think of the symbol for it.
What you are doing here is re-mapping your brain. I believe that this is where the difficulty is in understanding how Ec works. It is difficult to see how this mapping occurs, but it is how the brain works.
How does it work?
When we map one concept to another and use it then it will become more obvious how Ec can be used.
(Using it is the important part)
Quite difficult to explain, but by using Ec you are thinking in the language of perception.
Eventually, you will be able to teleport to a very specific location that you have defined in Ec by simply repeating the symbols and thinking of their values. (It's more reality-shifting than teleportation, but you get the idea.)
It is like putting the latitude and longitude coordinates into a vehicle and being driven there. Except you are interfacing directly with your perception rather than a vehicle.
By using Ec you are programming your perception. Ec is the software and your brain is the hardware, so to speak.
This is all quite new to everyone, I know. But it takes some time to understand and to get to the point where you are in control of what you perceive.
Baby steps is best, but I think the above is a good start.
"Mu" is the difference between one and another. The 'space', between two things.
(For the symbol, its input is high possibility and output is neutral possibility.)
"Mu" could be anything because it is nothing in particular. It represents possibility.
33
Simply, it is the language of perception. Thus, the language of anything perceived, which includes dreams.
We create language in order to explore relationships. The 'geometry of relationships' is what we perceive. The language is the relationship itself.
By using Ec we are 'creating' relationships. Your dreams will process these new relationships (new stimuli) and it will see vivid and real.
The dream world is merging with what we see as the physical world. The better we are able to communicate the more real our dreams will seem until, eventually, all of life is a dream.
Not dreaming in the way that everything is random or crazy and you don't understand things. It's actually much more consistent and logical than that (your brain, however, makes it seem differently because it does not have the proper language to express it).
When life is a dream, you simply know that there is no difference between you and your perceptions. Everywhere is ThohT.
1 - *You is your perception*. Interaction with your perceptions in order to begin to realize this. If you see running water, go feel it. If the phone is ringing, feel the ringing in your brain like you would in a dream. This is the way to controlling what you experience.
2 - *See the structure of reality* In your imagination, superimpose a fine grid over everything you are looking at. Try to imagine different sounds emanating from objects. It doesn't matter what sounds. What you're doing is telling your brain to show you more of what it sees. Then instead of you having to embellish what is there, it will show you.
It could take 2 days or 2,000 years. It depends on how willing you are to give up your idea of what "you" is. The crazier the above seems, the longer it will take.
We create language in order to explore relationships. The 'geometry of relationships' is what we perceive. The language is the relationship itself.
By using Ec we are 'creating' relationships. Your dreams will process these new relationships (new stimuli) and it will see vivid and real.
The dream world is merging with what we see as the physical world. The better we are able to communicate the more real our dreams will seem until, eventually, all of life is a dream.
Not dreaming in the way that everything is random or crazy and you don't understand things. It's actually much more consistent and logical than that (your brain, however, makes it seem differently because it does not have the proper language to express it).
When life is a dream, you simply know that there is no difference between you and your perceptions. Everywhere is ThohT.
1 - *You is your perception*. Interaction with your perceptions in order to begin to realize this. If you see running water, go feel it. If the phone is ringing, feel the ringing in your brain like you would in a dream. This is the way to controlling what you experience.
2 - *See the structure of reality* In your imagination, superimpose a fine grid over everything you are looking at. Try to imagine different sounds emanating from objects. It doesn't matter what sounds. What you're doing is telling your brain to show you more of what it sees. Then instead of you having to embellish what is there, it will show you.
It could take 2 days or 2,000 years. It depends on how willing you are to give up your idea of what "you" is. The crazier the above seems, the longer it will take.
34
We're in the process of 'doing it'. It's not something that will happen right away, of course. There are learning curves (and understanding curves). It's a totally different frame of mind. One that probably cannot be implemented overnight.
If you're interested, start small and look for small results. If it's useful then it may be a good idea to continue.
I know most of my advice isn't practical from certain perspectives. Many will read #1 or 2 above and not give it a second thought because they don't see how it would benefit them, or they'll try it for a few minutes and if nothing substantial happens then they'll give up.
Most give up. There's nothing wrong with this. What I describe is other-worldly and they're already well-integrated in this world.
Try a little. If a little happens then try something more.
Then ask yourself if the material has any value to your life. If so, see the material in the everyday rather than just concepts and philosophy functionally independent of your reality.
Everything in the universe fits into the model, because it is the model of perception.
All 4 are facets of the same thing.
However, all models modeled after the model are inaccurate. They work up to a point and break down at any point before that which cannot be perceived.
Not much to say on E=MC2 other than it may not be as accurate as we perceive it to be.
If you're interested, start small and look for small results. If it's useful then it may be a good idea to continue.
I know most of my advice isn't practical from certain perspectives. Many will read #1 or 2 above and not give it a second thought because they don't see how it would benefit them, or they'll try it for a few minutes and if nothing substantial happens then they'll give up.
Most give up. There's nothing wrong with this. What I describe is other-worldly and they're already well-integrated in this world.
Try a little. If a little happens then try something more.
Then ask yourself if the material has any value to your life. If so, see the material in the everyday rather than just concepts and philosophy functionally independent of your reality.
Everything in the universe fits into the model, because it is the model of perception.
All 4 are facets of the same thing.
However, all models modeled after the model are inaccurate. They work up to a point and break down at any point before that which cannot be perceived.
Not much to say on E=MC2 other than it may not be as accurate as we perceive it to be.
35
Make sure your symbol is relevant to what you intend. The more relevant, the better.
(No need for multiple symbols, especially ones that already have significant meaning to them (such as the dollar sign). The bottle cap is enough. However, I can only see this as being relevant if your company is a beverage company. But don't use the company's own symbols. Make up your own. Wrap the bottle cap in twine, for example.)
Next, allow the symbol to interact with your environment. For example, place it on your desk on top of your inbox or another place where people congregate for periods of time, such as the water cooler. But don't keep it just in the office. Take it outside and at home, too.
Do not force the symbols. Allow them to come to you.
Interaction should be with your perspective, not just part of your perspective. Your "company" also affects other parts of your perspective and this is just a way to delimit it.
(No need for multiple symbols, especially ones that already have significant meaning to them (such as the dollar sign). The bottle cap is enough. However, I can only see this as being relevant if your company is a beverage company. But don't use the company's own symbols. Make up your own. Wrap the bottle cap in twine, for example.)
Next, allow the symbol to interact with your environment. For example, place it on your desk on top of your inbox or another place where people congregate for periods of time, such as the water cooler. But don't keep it just in the office. Take it outside and at home, too.
Do not force the symbols. Allow them to come to you.
Interaction should be with your perspective, not just part of your perspective. Your "company" also affects other parts of your perspective and this is just a way to delimit it.
36
Thinking requires language
An interesting article on how persons born deaf think in 'Sign' here: [link to www.straightdope.com]
A quote: "Sign equips native users with the ability to manipulate symbols, grasp abstractions, and actively acquire and process knowledge--in short, to think, in the full human sense of the term. " [emphases mine]
Use different kinds of language to think in different kinds of ways and, thus, change your perspective.
Use Ec to "create your reality" (as is known*). Ec is very close to what you use to perceive and can be used to manipulate your perception as you wish.
*as previously mentioned, you're not creating anything. You're perceiving and experiencing your perspective. You are your perspective. (However, you only think the closest part of your perspective is "you".)
An interesting article on how persons born deaf think in 'Sign' here: [link to www.straightdope.com]
A quote: "Sign equips native users with the ability to manipulate symbols, grasp abstractions, and actively acquire and process knowledge--in short, to think, in the full human sense of the term. " [emphases mine]
Use different kinds of language to think in different kinds of ways and, thus, change your perspective.
Use Ec to "create your reality" (as is known*). Ec is very close to what you use to perceive and can be used to manipulate your perception as you wish.
*as previously mentioned, you're not creating anything. You're perceiving and experiencing your perspective. You are your perspective. (However, you only think the closest part of your perspective is "you".)
37
All 'worlds' are represented in this one. More specifically, everything that exists is also represented in your current perception.
For example, one particle's relation to every other particle in your perception could be a representation of an entire universe. (Just as an illustration.)
So, you could say that at all times (waking, sleeping, etc) do you pass through every other world. The worlds that are most related to yours, including mine, have the most feedback/feedforwards.
For example, one particle's relation to every other particle in your perception could be a representation of an entire universe. (Just as an illustration.)
So, you could say that at all times (waking, sleeping, etc) do you pass through every other world. The worlds that are most related to yours, including mine, have the most feedback/feedforwards.
38
As paradoxical or strange as it may sound, we each have a complete view of reality.
Our perspective is complete in that it "contains everything" that exists. Nothing need exist outside of it.
The words someone uses to verbally express their perspective is the only limited thing, we could say. When we speak about our world we are not describing our world but exploring the language we are using to express it. (Similar to how when we are looking into a microscope we are exploring a quality of the microscope rather than what we think is being observed. The extent of the microscope is far-reaching, as it is interacting with your complete perspective.)
Our perspective is complete in that it "contains everything" that exists. Nothing need exist outside of it.
The words someone uses to verbally express their perspective is the only limited thing, we could say. When we speak about our world we are not describing our world but exploring the language we are using to express it. (Similar to how when we are looking into a microscope we are exploring a quality of the microscope rather than what we think is being observed. The extent of the microscope is far-reaching, as it is interacting with your complete perspective.)
39
From the Genius page,
<<Step Four: Allow your symbol to interact
This step is probably the most important. Without the symbols interacting with your environment they cannot be integrated with your environment. If the new symbols don't interact then your reality stays the same.
New symbols you create must develop relationships with the symbols already in your perspective.
A relationship happens automatically as soon as you introduce a symbol or representation into your reality.
The more symbols interact with different aspects of your reality, the greater the result.>>
From what I understand, you haven't really integrated your new representation in your environment. You've just placed it where you would see it most.
Imagine that it were a conscious thing living in your house. What do you think it might do?
You simply change your perspective to something that is not relevant to your body's perspective in a way that is complete.
A bit different from deep sleep (as your new perspective upon awakening is still relative to your body).
And a bit different from being born (as your new perspective upon birth is still relative to your body).
To others, you die.
To yourself, nothing.
<<Step Four: Allow your symbol to interact
This step is probably the most important. Without the symbols interacting with your environment they cannot be integrated with your environment. If the new symbols don't interact then your reality stays the same.
New symbols you create must develop relationships with the symbols already in your perspective.
A relationship happens automatically as soon as you introduce a symbol or representation into your reality.
The more symbols interact with different aspects of your reality, the greater the result.>>
From what I understand, you haven't really integrated your new representation in your environment. You've just placed it where you would see it most.
Imagine that it were a conscious thing living in your house. What do you think it might do?
You simply change your perspective to something that is not relevant to your body's perspective in a way that is complete.
A bit different from deep sleep (as your new perspective upon awakening is still relative to your body).
And a bit different from being born (as your new perspective upon birth is still relative to your body).
To others, you die.
To yourself, nothing.
40
What we seem to do on the outside is actually an internal process.
You can "look within" by focusing exclusively on the physical.
I know there are a lot of persons who would not want to hear such a thing and believe in an internal/external division so strongly (yet may also believe that everything is one thing) that to them, such a thing isn't possible.
There is no correct path or intepretation. It is actually all the same.
You can "look within" by focusing exclusively on the physical.
I know there are a lot of persons who would not want to hear such a thing and believe in an internal/external division so strongly (yet may also believe that everything is one thing) that to them, such a thing isn't possible.
There is no correct path or intepretation. It is actually all the same.
41
Neuronics was introduced about 1 month ago, on November 23, 2010.
However, the 2-year anniversary of the introduction of Ecsys would be September of 2011.
I would not expect most people to learn much about new concepts in 1 month.
The Genius can work fast when used properly. This is from my own experience training others.
The disconnect is perhaps because these are new concepts unlike ones that you know currently.
This is part of the process.
For example, when we think that "symbol" can only be something like a dollar sign and not the tissue paper next to your dinner plate then we have some trouble letting go of these old concepts.
So, if I say that in order to use the Genius you create a symbol and your first symbol is a dollar sign this is part of the learning process. Your first symbol is your first effort. It is not 'wrong'. It is part of the learning process.
It is (literally) your brain connecting one concept to an other so that you begin to understand that the tissue paper is just as symbolic as the dollar sign.
Someone else may create a physical object on their first effort (as instructed). This is also part of the learning process. Each person is doing it the way they should. Not everyone does it the same.
When used properly, the Genius is extremely powerful and can be used immediately.
Let go of your old concepts in order to use something new.
However, the 2-year anniversary of the introduction of Ecsys would be September of 2011.
I would not expect most people to learn much about new concepts in 1 month.
The Genius can work fast when used properly. This is from my own experience training others.
The disconnect is perhaps because these are new concepts unlike ones that you know currently.
This is part of the process.
For example, when we think that "symbol" can only be something like a dollar sign and not the tissue paper next to your dinner plate then we have some trouble letting go of these old concepts.
So, if I say that in order to use the Genius you create a symbol and your first symbol is a dollar sign this is part of the learning process. Your first symbol is your first effort. It is not 'wrong'. It is part of the learning process.
It is (literally) your brain connecting one concept to an other so that you begin to understand that the tissue paper is just as symbolic as the dollar sign.
Someone else may create a physical object on their first effort (as instructed). This is also part of the learning process. Each person is doing it the way they should. Not everyone does it the same.
When used properly, the Genius is extremely powerful and can be used immediately.
Let go of your old concepts in order to use something new.
42
There are different levels of physicality, not just the kind you experience when you touch something. Light/sound is physical, as is dreaming and things-that-do-not-yet-have-words.
A lot of things land on Earth from other places, some quite far away. There's a lot of junk and energy flying around, most of which we can't see with our eyes.
We look at the moon and thank the heavens for our atmosphere but overlook the things we can't readily see that are able to get past it and not only change our physical environment but our human biology.
We may think a new idea (like Twitter, for example) came from some guy messing around on his computer when it may have come from outer space. I don't mean aliens implanting ideas into our minds but a thing like a virus or energetic influence.
Sometimes industrial influences are blamed for changes to our bodies, minds, and environment that originated extra-terrestrially. (Sometimes the industry itself is from outer space.)
It's all perspective, however. The distance between you and the most distant star is not a physical one, however. It's an illustration of how relative something is to you.
A flash of insight may have come from an other galaxy because it's not relative.
The first microbes on Earth may have come from outside it because they were not very relative to the local environment.
Outside influences are necessary because things, naturally, are not exactly relatively to one-another.
The more "rapidly" we develop the more what we develop is relative to what there was immediately previous. So, we are actually becoming more relevant humans. We are adopting our technology into our biology, in body and mind. And that is a kind of human very unlike our ancestors.
We know of anything through its representation, no matter what system we're using. (There really is no difference.)
The new symbol you create only has to have meaning to you. It does not need to be revealed to any one else. People can interact with it without knowing the meaning. (They, in fact, do because they're your perspective.)
A lot of things land on Earth from other places, some quite far away. There's a lot of junk and energy flying around, most of which we can't see with our eyes.
We look at the moon and thank the heavens for our atmosphere but overlook the things we can't readily see that are able to get past it and not only change our physical environment but our human biology.
We may think a new idea (like Twitter, for example) came from some guy messing around on his computer when it may have come from outer space. I don't mean aliens implanting ideas into our minds but a thing like a virus or energetic influence.
Sometimes industrial influences are blamed for changes to our bodies, minds, and environment that originated extra-terrestrially. (Sometimes the industry itself is from outer space.)
It's all perspective, however. The distance between you and the most distant star is not a physical one, however. It's an illustration of how relative something is to you.
A flash of insight may have come from an other galaxy because it's not relative.
The first microbes on Earth may have come from outside it because they were not very relative to the local environment.
Outside influences are necessary because things, naturally, are not exactly relatively to one-another.
The more "rapidly" we develop the more what we develop is relative to what there was immediately previous. So, we are actually becoming more relevant humans. We are adopting our technology into our biology, in body and mind. And that is a kind of human very unlike our ancestors.
We know of anything through its representation, no matter what system we're using. (There really is no difference.)
The new symbol you create only has to have meaning to you. It does not need to be revealed to any one else. People can interact with it without knowing the meaning. (They, in fact, do because they're your perspective.)
43
Humanity can also be defined as, "Psychological characteristics that all normal humans have in common".
I would extend this to include the state of being human, which increasingly includes non-physical things.
Moreso, the future is probably very different from what we now know.
There was a time when even the clothes you are now wearing were "impossible". There are many more "impossibilities" in our future, even the end of human natural death.
I'm sure the fetus thinks it will die if it leaves the womb. But, for it, a new kind of physicality is at hand (and foot, and mouth...) An expanded version of itself in which it can see the things it only heard of before through the walls of the womb, as in a dream.
Thankfully, things change and life goes on without our old ideas of what we should be.
I would extend this to include the state of being human, which increasingly includes non-physical things.
Moreso, the future is probably very different from what we now know.
There was a time when even the clothes you are now wearing were "impossible". There are many more "impossibilities" in our future, even the end of human natural death.
I'm sure the fetus thinks it will die if it leaves the womb. But, for it, a new kind of physicality is at hand (and foot, and mouth...) An expanded version of itself in which it can see the things it only heard of before through the walls of the womb, as in a dream.
Thankfully, things change and life goes on without our old ideas of what we should be.
44
An exercise...
As you are in motion, imagine yourself being still and sensing your experience (especially vision) looking through your eyes from a stationary position.
Try it while being a passenger in a car, looking out of the window.
When you appear to be moving through space, it is an illusion. There is no movement and no space. What you're experiencing is a kind of 'change' in perspective. You're always experiencing the most important perspective you can experience. (Importance is an what would be most valuable for you at the time.
As you are in motion, imagine yourself being still and sensing your experience (especially vision) looking through your eyes from a stationary position.
Try it while being a passenger in a car, looking out of the window.
When you appear to be moving through space, it is an illusion. There is no movement and no space. What you're experiencing is a kind of 'change' in perspective. You're always experiencing the most important perspective you can experience. (Importance is an what would be most valuable for you at the time.
45
Again, the planets, Earth, galaxies, neighbors in the universe do not need to exist until you perceive them.
Planets do not exist but in the imagination. When you look at one through a telescope then a new kind of relationship is made. But there is no atmosphere in this perception, and it need not exist until you go there and interact with it.
The Law of Energy Perspective is symbol (5) without possibility (2) which comes alive only through interaction (3).
Without interaction with the representation, it exists only as a possibility (i.e., does not exist).
In Ec, there is no right or wrong. There is only perspective.
If you think cats are evil then you'd map it out as such.
You can say "cat" in English but does the person to whom you are speaking really know how you feel?
When you exercise the expression in Ec the person may know that you're talking about something 'feline' and 'evil' for example. They'd usually use their own perspective about what it is.
That's the beauty of Ec. By communicating in it you form a tremendous amount of relationships and, thus, more things become relative. (Thus, expansion of what you'd call intelligence and lots of other fun stuff.)
However, it may be hard to conceptualize how a word in Ec can have both standard definitions and a more nebulous definition.
But actually, in English you do it all the time in a somewhat different way. (Ever pick up on social queues? Maybe a friend's "yes" has a deeper meaning, for example.)
Planets do not exist but in the imagination. When you look at one through a telescope then a new kind of relationship is made. But there is no atmosphere in this perception, and it need not exist until you go there and interact with it.
The Law of Energy Perspective is symbol (5) without possibility (2) which comes alive only through interaction (3).
Without interaction with the representation, it exists only as a possibility (i.e., does not exist).
In Ec, there is no right or wrong. There is only perspective.
If you think cats are evil then you'd map it out as such.
You can say "cat" in English but does the person to whom you are speaking really know how you feel?
When you exercise the expression in Ec the person may know that you're talking about something 'feline' and 'evil' for example. They'd usually use their own perspective about what it is.
That's the beauty of Ec. By communicating in it you form a tremendous amount of relationships and, thus, more things become relative. (Thus, expansion of what you'd call intelligence and lots of other fun stuff.)
However, it may be hard to conceptualize how a word in Ec can have both standard definitions and a more nebulous definition.
But actually, in English you do it all the time in a somewhat different way. (Ever pick up on social queues? Maybe a friend's "yes" has a deeper meaning, for example.)
46
(The following may get more confusing as you continue to read)
The Ec language itself follows the Genius.
For "Symbol" we have neuronicons.
For "Interaction" we have inputs and outputs.
For "Possibility" we have Ec language.
For "Logic" we have the rules of Ec language.
So, you could say that inputs and outputs are ways for each neuronicon to interact with one-another.
There are 66 neuronicons. Each of the 4 elements (Symbol, Interaction, Possibility, Logic) can function as either an input or an output. This way, each element can interact with a neuronicon, creating further possibility.
e.g., we use Logic to Interact with a Symbol, creating Possibility.
Symbol is the most interactive input and can be an used in 30 icons.
Logic is the least interactive input and can only be used in 3 icons
On this Ec chart [link to ecsys.org] going clockwise from the top of each symbol an input is first, followed by the output.
What good is an input and an output? It allows your brain to process information faster (i.e., making distant things more relative).
In school, We learn that everything has an input and output value according to your perspective.
For ease of explanation, take a clock.
Imagine that you put one of the 4 elements into a clock and out comes one of the 4 elements.
Then, do determine the input and output for the clock we can ask (to illustrate):
(For Input) "What is the element before we interact with the clock?"
(For Output) "what is the element after we interact with the clock?"
Often, the input is a symbol (which is why it is most compatible). We can then ask, for example, "Is it a powerful symbol, a neutral symbol, or a weak symbol in my perspective?"
We could say that a clock is a powerful symbol because it represents time.
We could also say that the output of the clock in your perspective is interaction (or even possibility) because interacting with the clock often causes us to interact with other things. This isn't as strong, so let's say that it's neutral.
So now we have: input-high symbol, output-neutral interaction
Which is equal to the 4th Ec, "oo"
You would do this as many times as you feel comfortable that you have mapped the clock in your perspective.
Usually, Ec words have 3 characters so you could do it 3 times. Perhaps 'clock' is more common and easier to map, so then you can do it 2 times to define its place in your perspective.
The above may sound complicated but once people get the hang of it it's not so bad.
When mapping a concept there are really only 3 things to think about:
1) What is the element before and after I interact with it?
2) If not mapped fully in my perspective, then repeat step 1
3) How is it written and how do I pronounce it?
The Ec language itself follows the Genius.
For "Symbol" we have neuronicons.
For "Interaction" we have inputs and outputs.
For "Possibility" we have Ec language.
For "Logic" we have the rules of Ec language.
So, you could say that inputs and outputs are ways for each neuronicon to interact with one-another.
There are 66 neuronicons. Each of the 4 elements (Symbol, Interaction, Possibility, Logic) can function as either an input or an output. This way, each element can interact with a neuronicon, creating further possibility.
e.g., we use Logic to Interact with a Symbol, creating Possibility.
Symbol is the most interactive input and can be an used in 30 icons.
Logic is the least interactive input and can only be used in 3 icons
On this Ec chart [link to ecsys.org] going clockwise from the top of each symbol an input is first, followed by the output.
What good is an input and an output? It allows your brain to process information faster (i.e., making distant things more relative).
In school, We learn that everything has an input and output value according to your perspective.
For ease of explanation, take a clock.
Imagine that you put one of the 4 elements into a clock and out comes one of the 4 elements.
Then, do determine the input and output for the clock we can ask (to illustrate):
(For Input) "What is the element before we interact with the clock?"
(For Output) "what is the element after we interact with the clock?"
Often, the input is a symbol (which is why it is most compatible). We can then ask, for example, "Is it a powerful symbol, a neutral symbol, or a weak symbol in my perspective?"
We could say that a clock is a powerful symbol because it represents time.
We could also say that the output of the clock in your perspective is interaction (or even possibility) because interacting with the clock often causes us to interact with other things. This isn't as strong, so let's say that it's neutral.
So now we have: input-high symbol, output-neutral interaction
Which is equal to the 4th Ec, "oo"
You would do this as many times as you feel comfortable that you have mapped the clock in your perspective.
Usually, Ec words have 3 characters so you could do it 3 times. Perhaps 'clock' is more common and easier to map, so then you can do it 2 times to define its place in your perspective.
The above may sound complicated but once people get the hang of it it's not so bad.
When mapping a concept there are really only 3 things to think about:
1) What is the element before and after I interact with it?
2) If not mapped fully in my perspective, then repeat step 1
3) How is it written and how do I pronounce it?
47
Just try one word, and see how it works for you.
Start with a feeling or concept that you'd like to bring closer to your perspective.
Pick one of the following that you think best describes it: Symbol, Interaction, Logic, Possibility
(We'll make this the input, and make it strong for ease of use)
Now pick a second one from the same list (Symbol, Interaction, Logic, Possibility)
(We'll make this the output, and make it neutral)
Now check the following graphic and see what your input and output would look like: [link to ecsys.org]
Draw it on a piece of paper. Be sure to include the box position if it is right next to a box.
Now see this chart: [link to ecsys.org]
Make note of the icon that corresponds to your concept/feeling.
You can stick with one icon or, for better results, use two.
Practice saying the new sound or phrase and thinking of it when you think of this concept/feeling.
Notice when others say it, too, or when you hear it.
Say it to others, also, and use it in everyday language.
You've mapped the concept to your perspective, and that is one of the ways that Ec works.
Our perspective is like a complex language that interacts endlessly. We can insert our own 'words' into this complexity in order to manipulate our own reality.
Eventually (in more advanced uses) you can form your entire reality this way.
Start with a feeling or concept that you'd like to bring closer to your perspective.
Pick one of the following that you think best describes it: Symbol, Interaction, Logic, Possibility
(We'll make this the input, and make it strong for ease of use)
Now pick a second one from the same list (Symbol, Interaction, Logic, Possibility)
(We'll make this the output, and make it neutral)
Now check the following graphic and see what your input and output would look like: [link to ecsys.org]
Draw it on a piece of paper. Be sure to include the box position if it is right next to a box.
Now see this chart: [link to ecsys.org]
Make note of the icon that corresponds to your concept/feeling.
You can stick with one icon or, for better results, use two.
Practice saying the new sound or phrase and thinking of it when you think of this concept/feeling.
Notice when others say it, too, or when you hear it.
Say it to others, also, and use it in everyday language.
You've mapped the concept to your perspective, and that is one of the ways that Ec works.
Our perspective is like a complex language that interacts endlessly. We can insert our own 'words' into this complexity in order to manipulate our own reality.
Eventually (in more advanced uses) you can form your entire reality this way.
48
Because the map isn't just about that specific location. It is also about what is around that location.
For example, where would you go if you had that car? Do you think you would use the valet parking at a particular restaurant, or go cruising along the coast? Would you wash your car by hand more often?
Interact with these other elements to make them more relative to your experience.
In the above example, do not wait until you have the car to do the things you would do if you had the car. Make it relative to your experience now. Wash your old car now as you would your new car.
It is kind of like you want to go to a party but cannot receive a direct invitation from the hosts. You must, instead, get the invitation from their neighbors.
If the car is a location on your map you need to 'get invited' by the other experiences near that location.
You 'get invited' by having those experiences now. That will make it more likely that you will find yourself in the location that you desire.
The Genius is simply about drawing a logical map from one perspective to an other perspective. Your mind needs to see how it can get from one location to an other. The Genius makes it obvious, and helps you to realize the experience. (In more advanced uses, it 'creates' the experiences on-the-fly, kind of like a holodeck.)
If the symbol is restricted to work, then they may be limiting where the experience will come from.
Meaning, it may take years if waiting for a promotion and salary hike to be able to afford the car (restricting interaction of symbol to work).
Or three months if starting a new business or any other type of situation whereby they would have it (not restricting it).
If the experience is about 'owning' the car, then take out concepts like 'being able to afford it', 'having the down payment', 'getting a great job', etc. Those concepts aren't relevant to your intention.
For example, where would you go if you had that car? Do you think you would use the valet parking at a particular restaurant, or go cruising along the coast? Would you wash your car by hand more often?
Interact with these other elements to make them more relative to your experience.
In the above example, do not wait until you have the car to do the things you would do if you had the car. Make it relative to your experience now. Wash your old car now as you would your new car.
It is kind of like you want to go to a party but cannot receive a direct invitation from the hosts. You must, instead, get the invitation from their neighbors.
If the car is a location on your map you need to 'get invited' by the other experiences near that location.
You 'get invited' by having those experiences now. That will make it more likely that you will find yourself in the location that you desire.
The Genius is simply about drawing a logical map from one perspective to an other perspective. Your mind needs to see how it can get from one location to an other. The Genius makes it obvious, and helps you to realize the experience. (In more advanced uses, it 'creates' the experiences on-the-fly, kind of like a holodeck.)
If the symbol is restricted to work, then they may be limiting where the experience will come from.
Meaning, it may take years if waiting for a promotion and salary hike to be able to afford the car (restricting interaction of symbol to work).
Or three months if starting a new business or any other type of situation whereby they would have it (not restricting it).
If the experience is about 'owning' the car, then take out concepts like 'being able to afford it', 'having the down payment', 'getting a great job', etc. Those concepts aren't relevant to your intention.
49
It may be convenient to think about seeds and sources, but really there is none of this.
There is perception. And that is it.
The way we perceive is very similar to the Genius.
Everything in perception comes from this 'force', although there is no real force because forces are illusions.
You need only define yourself as what you are now. If you are Brain/Brian then that is the most relative to what you are. There is a reason it is most relative, and a reason you are experiencing this particular aspect of perspective right now.
Nothing else is necessary. Nothing else exists. There is really nothing else to do.
We seek meaning in stuff that doesn't really exist.
The meaning is here, beneath our potato chips and Shark Week episodes.
The trick is to realize that it is the same thing as anything you imagine to be god-like.
You decide what comes 'next' by making things more relative to what you define yourself to be, so to speak.
There is perception. And that is it.
The way we perceive is very similar to the Genius.
Everything in perception comes from this 'force', although there is no real force because forces are illusions.
You need only define yourself as what you are now. If you are Brain/Brian then that is the most relative to what you are. There is a reason it is most relative, and a reason you are experiencing this particular aspect of perspective right now.
Nothing else is necessary. Nothing else exists. There is really nothing else to do.
We seek meaning in stuff that doesn't really exist.
The meaning is here, beneath our potato chips and Shark Week episodes.
The trick is to realize that it is the same thing as anything you imagine to be god-like.
You decide what comes 'next' by making things more relative to what you define yourself to be, so to speak.
50
You are not your body. Your body is the most relative aspect of your perspective at this moment.
However, everything else you perceive is also relative to your perspective. (Some more than others, of course. This is usually by physical distance in time and space. This changes moment-to-moment, as you sense it.)
Your "body" is your entire perspective.
In this way, you being "all" may not be hard to fathom if you consider that the 'real' you does not have a name and is everything you see.
You can only experience yourself.
That is how it exists. As part of your perspective.
Oftentimes people will ask something like, "Well if I cannot know of anything beyond my perception then why when I ask my friends can they tell me about stuff that happened?".. forgetting that their friends, along with everything else, is also a part of their perspective.
However, everything else you perceive is also relative to your perspective. (Some more than others, of course. This is usually by physical distance in time and space. This changes moment-to-moment, as you sense it.)
Your "body" is your entire perspective.
In this way, you being "all" may not be hard to fathom if you consider that the 'real' you does not have a name and is everything you see.
You can only experience yourself.
That is how it exists. As part of your perspective.
Oftentimes people will ask something like, "Well if I cannot know of anything beyond my perception then why when I ask my friends can they tell me about stuff that happened?".. forgetting that their friends, along with everything else, is also a part of their perspective.
51
Is there a need to conceptualize the "unknown"?
Wouldn't that be an oxymoron?
It is not that you have "all the power". It's that there is no need for anything else to exist.
Right now, for example, you do not have the full power of our sun.
You are have bits and pieces of what the sun is, in your reality. (There is no need for the full power of the sun to exist. It is enough that you think it does, in the same way that you think everything else exists.)
The 'power' you have is perception. There really is no other power in the universe.
We then break down 'perception' into the 4 elements. It doesn't matter what you call them.
If there is a "great mystery" then you are putting the pieces together in order of relativity. Learning from what is relative pushes things 'forward' and makes it seem like you are moving in time's pace, and that there is action and thought.
The mystery is that there is no mystery because it is beyond perception. All is here now, in your current perspective. That it is hiding in plain sight I suppose would be a kind of mystery, though not at all disappointing when you understand the "now here".
I would add that the "unknown" is irrelevant to knowledge.
That which cannot be perceived is not waiting for you to perceive it. It is irrelevant to perception.
The infinite is not waiting to be counted or measured by someone in the distant future. It is irrelevant to measurement.
But seeking to measure the infinite 'creates' what seems to be finite. Seeking to know the "unknown" allows us to know anything without end.
And seeking to perceive that to which perception is irrelevant allows us to make relevant perceptions.
The biggest mystery of all, perhaps, is that perception is not possible because it is irrelevant to possibility ;)
Wouldn't that be an oxymoron?
It is not that you have "all the power". It's that there is no need for anything else to exist.
Right now, for example, you do not have the full power of our sun.
You are have bits and pieces of what the sun is, in your reality. (There is no need for the full power of the sun to exist. It is enough that you think it does, in the same way that you think everything else exists.)
The 'power' you have is perception. There really is no other power in the universe.
We then break down 'perception' into the 4 elements. It doesn't matter what you call them.
If there is a "great mystery" then you are putting the pieces together in order of relativity. Learning from what is relative pushes things 'forward' and makes it seem like you are moving in time's pace, and that there is action and thought.
The mystery is that there is no mystery because it is beyond perception. All is here now, in your current perspective. That it is hiding in plain sight I suppose would be a kind of mystery, though not at all disappointing when you understand the "now here".
I would add that the "unknown" is irrelevant to knowledge.
That which cannot be perceived is not waiting for you to perceive it. It is irrelevant to perception.
The infinite is not waiting to be counted or measured by someone in the distant future. It is irrelevant to measurement.
But seeking to measure the infinite 'creates' what seems to be finite. Seeking to know the "unknown" allows us to know anything without end.
And seeking to perceive that to which perception is irrelevant allows us to make relevant perceptions.
The biggest mystery of all, perhaps, is that perception is not possible because it is irrelevant to possibility ;)