NOTES FROM AN 'ALTERNATE UNIVERSE'
DO YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED AT FARPOINT STATION?
SEPTEMBER 29 - OCTOBER 28
1
My previous thread Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. is an introduction to my world, called X.
Over the past couple of years I have been introducing a very popular way of thinking in my world and have told you that your world is merging with my world.
Some summaries:
Who are we? Who Am I? [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
More explanation on who/what/why, etc: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
An excerpt from August 1, 2011 ( Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. (Page 47) ):
Things are not really going faster. But more crazy stuff is becoming more relative to your current experience, so it may seem that way (that time is speeding up).
You can look at things from the perspective of your current physical self, or you can look at things from what you are becoming more of.
If the former, then consider the following expression:
[link to www.cropcircleconnector.com]
Each enclosed circle represents a time-perspective (date), each unenclosed circle represents a space-perspective (world).
The larger circle on the bottom left represents September 29, 2011. Then, the last circle is October 28, 2011.
September 29 is the date when the Earth is shaken, not stirred, like a Bond.
October 18 (in the middle) is the date that we cross Earth's orbit.
October 28 is the date that Earth crosses our path.
Quoting: Chaol
I talked about September 2, September 9, and September 23 being significant dates.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Here's a recap of September 23: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
and what is going on now:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
We continue to think in terms of the old physicality. We are still trying to hold onto old perspectives and ways of thinking.
But I'm here to tell you a new kind of physicality is at hand. (What one poster in the other thread called 'Dream Physics').
Basically, I am just telling you what is going on. I am the only one that knows (that is posting on the internet; old monks don't care to) what is going on right now because what is going on right now is directly related to the world and perspective that I am most familiar with.
At first, I did it passively by telling you about my world and that it is merging with your world. Good times were had and many considered it an 'excellent thread' or 'the best on GLP'. A lot of people were confused, of course, because the material is so different.
Things are happening now (as you'd call it) so I've been a bit more direct lately (albeit at the expense of being called a 'fear mongerer' by one poster for whatever reason).
Indirect = confusing and mysterious
Direct = fear mongering?
I don't think so. I'm not trying to spread "doom" or such. I am simply telling you not only what is happening, but why and how.
Funny thing is, the "indirect" way is very direct to me and the "direct" way is missing the point. It's all a matter of perspective, I suppose.
Regardless... it's even funnier that many of us don't believe what NASA says ("Never a Straight Answer", right?). However, we still believe a silly little java applet that ambiguously illustrates that Elenin is aligning with Earth on September 26th.
Because Elenin represents my world, I can tell you that this is not true.
No alignment occurred on September 26th, 2011.
The actual date of importance is September 29th (as I have illustrated on the crop circle link, above).
This has played out before in certain myths. Jesus being crucified (September 26) and being resurrected 3 days later. More importantly, Horus. (As I mention in my other thread, there is no history. All is value of the present moment. Your stories are not stories about the past but of the present.)
In fact, in my postings I have not mentioned September 26th at all. Only:
September 2 - It all starts
September 9 - Massive energies are received by Earth
September 23 - A date of special significance
September 29 - The Earth is shaken, not stirred. Like a bond.
October 1 - You get the doom you are obviously expecting.
(I haven't talked about later in October or November because it is highly unlikely that anyone would remotely understand the probably experiences associated with that time. The perspective is very different.)
I've started this thread in order that more persons may know what is going on now.
I also want to present to you what is likely the most important question you've ever been asked. And that is:
Why should Western civilization be saved?
In helping to answer this question, imagine that your words heavily influence what happens next.
Imagine that you are Captain Jean Luc Picard standing in front of Q at Farpoint Station, and humanity is being put on trial. (Except you are helping to explain why Western civilization should not be destroyed.)
Strangely, your words will decide the "fate" of humanity.
"Love and light" is a fantasy. It doesn't work for most of the human population. Besides that, it goes against nature when you try to force things.
What works is destruction, unfortunately.
I will be working very hard on this.
Over the past couple of years I have been introducing a very popular way of thinking in my world and have told you that your world is merging with my world.
Some summaries:
Who are we? Who Am I? [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
More explanation on who/what/why, etc: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
An excerpt from August 1, 2011 ( Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. (Page 47) ):
Things are not really going faster. But more crazy stuff is becoming more relative to your current experience, so it may seem that way (that time is speeding up).
You can look at things from the perspective of your current physical self, or you can look at things from what you are becoming more of.
If the former, then consider the following expression:
[link to www.cropcircleconnector.com]
Each enclosed circle represents a time-perspective (date), each unenclosed circle represents a space-perspective (world).
The larger circle on the bottom left represents September 29, 2011. Then, the last circle is October 28, 2011.
September 29 is the date when the Earth is shaken, not stirred, like a Bond.
October 18 (in the middle) is the date that we cross Earth's orbit.
October 28 is the date that Earth crosses our path.
Quoting: Chaol
I talked about September 2, September 9, and September 23 being significant dates.
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Here's a recap of September 23: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
and what is going on now:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
We continue to think in terms of the old physicality. We are still trying to hold onto old perspectives and ways of thinking.
But I'm here to tell you a new kind of physicality is at hand. (What one poster in the other thread called 'Dream Physics').
Basically, I am just telling you what is going on. I am the only one that knows (that is posting on the internet; old monks don't care to) what is going on right now because what is going on right now is directly related to the world and perspective that I am most familiar with.
At first, I did it passively by telling you about my world and that it is merging with your world. Good times were had and many considered it an 'excellent thread' or 'the best on GLP'. A lot of people were confused, of course, because the material is so different.
Things are happening now (as you'd call it) so I've been a bit more direct lately (albeit at the expense of being called a 'fear mongerer' by one poster for whatever reason).
Indirect = confusing and mysterious
Direct = fear mongering?
I don't think so. I'm not trying to spread "doom" or such. I am simply telling you not only what is happening, but why and how.
Funny thing is, the "indirect" way is very direct to me and the "direct" way is missing the point. It's all a matter of perspective, I suppose.
Regardless... it's even funnier that many of us don't believe what NASA says ("Never a Straight Answer", right?). However, we still believe a silly little java applet that ambiguously illustrates that Elenin is aligning with Earth on September 26th.
Because Elenin represents my world, I can tell you that this is not true.
No alignment occurred on September 26th, 2011.
The actual date of importance is September 29th (as I have illustrated on the crop circle link, above).
This has played out before in certain myths. Jesus being crucified (September 26) and being resurrected 3 days later. More importantly, Horus. (As I mention in my other thread, there is no history. All is value of the present moment. Your stories are not stories about the past but of the present.)
In fact, in my postings I have not mentioned September 26th at all. Only:
September 2 - It all starts
September 9 - Massive energies are received by Earth
September 23 - A date of special significance
September 29 - The Earth is shaken, not stirred. Like a bond.
October 1 - You get the doom you are obviously expecting.
(I haven't talked about later in October or November because it is highly unlikely that anyone would remotely understand the probably experiences associated with that time. The perspective is very different.)
I've started this thread in order that more persons may know what is going on now.
I also want to present to you what is likely the most important question you've ever been asked. And that is:
Why should Western civilization be saved?
In helping to answer this question, imagine that your words heavily influence what happens next.
Imagine that you are Captain Jean Luc Picard standing in front of Q at Farpoint Station, and humanity is being put on trial. (Except you are helping to explain why Western civilization should not be destroyed.)
Strangely, your words will decide the "fate" of humanity.
"Love and light" is a fantasy. It doesn't work for most of the human population. Besides that, it goes against nature when you try to force things.
What works is destruction, unfortunately.
I will be working very hard on this.
2
September 29 is the canary in the gold mine (or iron mine).
Those in the UK should heed their former meridian.
(Note: by "Western civilization" I was really only referring to the tentacles of a certain empire, but not really naming names)
"canary in the gold mine (or iron mine)" has a triple meaning. Referring to:
-Canary Islands
-A warning, as canary birds were used by coal miners because the toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and methane in the mine would kill the bird first.
-The name of the location is phonetically identical to the Spanish word for "iron"
The location of this event has another meaning, also. The thing itself that came alive on September 29th is the canary.
But, alas, most of us are expecting October 1st to come early.
Those in the UK should heed their former meridian.
(Note: by "Western civilization" I was really only referring to the tentacles of a certain empire, but not really naming names)
"canary in the gold mine (or iron mine)" has a triple meaning. Referring to:
-Canary Islands
-A warning, as canary birds were used by coal miners because the toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and methane in the mine would kill the bird first.
-The name of the location is phonetically identical to the Spanish word for "iron"
The location of this event has another meaning, also. The thing itself that came alive on September 29th is the canary.
But, alas, most of us are expecting October 1st to come early.
3
I know it can be a bit complicated. But once you learn it there's no limit to what it can be used for.
Perhaps once the destruction of Western civilization is underway I will be able to help you with this. (A bit busy at the moment, unfortunately.)
In the meantime, though, please get what you can out of the other thread.
It's a new language for us, so it requires "new" ways of thinking. Focus more on the new method of thinking rather than the language itself and it will be much easier.
Perhaps once the destruction of Western civilization is underway I will be able to help you with this. (A bit busy at the moment, unfortunately.)
In the meantime, though, please get what you can out of the other thread.
It's a new language for us, so it requires "new" ways of thinking. Focus more on the new method of thinking rather than the language itself and it will be much easier.
4
September 29:
[link to www.01.ign.es]
Immense pressure, like a Bond, is not only building up tremendously but has "shaken loose" an important layer in the Earth's mantle in that region.
This bond (meaning 3) stretches all around the Earth, of course, so it is telling us that pressure in the mantle is at extreme levels and magma is continuing to build up at a rapid pace.
[link to www.01.ign.es]
Immense pressure, like a Bond, is not only building up tremendously but has "shaken loose" an important layer in the Earth's mantle in that region.
This bond (meaning 3) stretches all around the Earth, of course, so it is telling us that pressure in the mantle is at extreme levels and magma is continuing to build up at a rapid pace.
5
Who are the leaders if not for persons just like anyone else?
Leadership is just a façade, an illusion of what something should be like.
We are all in charge of something, and may pretty much echo the same personas as those we think we are subservient to.
If one leader was not there, surely there would be someone ready to take their place.
We could say that under the same conditions we would be making the same choices.
So what is the real difference between one who leads and one who follows other than the environment they have been conditioned to?
Leadership is just a façade, an illusion of what something should be like.
We are all in charge of something, and may pretty much echo the same personas as those we think we are subservient to.
If one leader was not there, surely there would be someone ready to take their place.
We could say that under the same conditions we would be making the same choices.
So what is the real difference between one who leads and one who follows other than the environment they have been conditioned to?
6
Assuredly, this civilization is incapable of destroying the planet. Dare we think we have that much of an effect on this planet? (It will be here for billions more of your years yet. Will we?)
However, we are very much capable (and perhaps ready) to destroy ourselves.
We are also capable of, as a whole, evolution towards a continued existence.
Which one is the work in progress?
However, we are very much capable (and perhaps ready) to destroy ourselves.
We are also capable of, as a whole, evolution towards a continued existence.
Which one is the work in progress?
7
The real question is one that we can each ask ourselves. Perhaps, "should we continue with the current perspective or go tabula rasa?"
Anything less than a blank slate would probably not be effective. It would be similar to what you find yourself in every few years when new leaders are 'elected'.
More of the same, but slightly different stage and actors.
Anything less than a blank slate would probably not be effective. It would be similar to what you find yourself in every few years when new leaders are 'elected'.
More of the same, but slightly different stage and actors.
8
My native language is English.
However, I mean something along the lines of "The English Empire". And, no, I don't specially mean England.
Language is a powerful tool. And English has created vast empires in the minds of all of us.
However, it is also useful. So it is time to retire the 'dictionary' authors and allow new definitions to create new experiences.
However, I mean something along the lines of "The English Empire". And, no, I don't specially mean England.
Language is a powerful tool. And English has created vast empires in the minds of all of us.
However, it is also useful. So it is time to retire the 'dictionary' authors and allow new definitions to create new experiences.
9
And here is the crux of the matter.
We divide one from an other. And we usually pretend that we don't do it, it doesn't happen, or when it does happen we make an excuse for it.
This goes against a natural process.
Without division there would exist no universe or illusion to perceive.
We do it secretly, quietly, and behind others' backs.
It is natural, but do we nurture this process or try to kill it?
We divide one from an other. And we usually pretend that we don't do it, it doesn't happen, or when it does happen we make an excuse for it.
This goes against a natural process.
Without division there would exist no universe or illusion to perceive.
We do it secretly, quietly, and behind others' backs.
It is natural, but do we nurture this process or try to kill it?
10
There is no choice that needs to be made.
In my world we have discovered what you'd call the law of the universe (please, no tomatoes...)
This law is simply that no energy is indepedent of your perspective.
This means that we perceive that which takes the least amount of energy to perceive.
Which means that your experience 'will be' whatever comes next, in a logical sense. (Not logical to you, but logical to all things considered in your reality.)
If you want a new experience then make it logical to get there from where you are.
And if, eventually, that new experience takes less energy than what you had previously, then it will be a part of your reality.
This is the simple explanation, of course. But actually it's all you need because all of the complex things can be represented and worked with as they were simple at their core (which they are).
In my world we have discovered what you'd call the law of the universe (please, no tomatoes...)
This law is simply that no energy is indepedent of your perspective.
This means that we perceive that which takes the least amount of energy to perceive.
Which means that your experience 'will be' whatever comes next, in a logical sense. (Not logical to you, but logical to all things considered in your reality.)
If you want a new experience then make it logical to get there from where you are.
And if, eventually, that new experience takes less energy than what you had previously, then it will be a part of your reality.
This is the simple explanation, of course. But actually it's all you need because all of the complex things can be represented and worked with as they were simple at their core (which they are).
11
We often do not remember if it's not immediately within our sense.
"Out of sight, out of mind."
Which may also be why we do not understand what we want to "save", be it the planet, foreigners in distress, or the local crackhead.
It is I which wants to be saved, interpreted endlessly as others because we do not yet grasp that I's expanse.
"Out of sight, out of mind."
Which may also be why we do not understand what we want to "save", be it the planet, foreigners in distress, or the local crackhead.
It is I which wants to be saved, interpreted endlessly as others because we do not yet grasp that I's expanse.
12
We all share the same world, like we share the same air.
The dream world is our world.
Part of your brain is yet dreaming now, even in your waking state.
The difference is that we have not yet learned, in this world, how to work within the new physicality that much.
But we are beginning to see more of our dreams come to reality.
The two are the same.
The dream world is our world.
Part of your brain is yet dreaming now, even in your waking state.
The difference is that we have not yet learned, in this world, how to work within the new physicality that much.
But we are beginning to see more of our dreams come to reality.
The two are the same.
13
As crazy as it sounds, it's all because of language.
This guy explains it better than I can at the moment: [link to www.alphabetvsgoddess.com]
It's like someone has created a computer program that can infect the minds of hosts and cause them to act in certain ways.
We need not destroy the program completely. Only change the definitions.
And we change the definitions by changing the authors of those definitions.
Sounds crazy? Of course.
This guy explains it better than I can at the moment: [link to www.alphabetvsgoddess.com]
It's like someone has created a computer program that can infect the minds of hosts and cause them to act in certain ways.
We need not destroy the program completely. Only change the definitions.
And we change the definitions by changing the authors of those definitions.
Sounds crazy? Of course.
14
The strangeness of the matter is that we resist the natural progression of things.
Many of us want to "save the world" when it needs no such thing. We even go so far as working against natural geophysical processes, thinking that we are doing it, and ourselves, a favor.
We cannot see the forest for the trees. And we cannot see the trees because we think we have the greatest effect on the Earth. The beginning and the end, perhaps.
The "problem", if there ever was one, is that we continue to interfere in natural processes.
...all the while thinking that we are doing "good".
So the "problem" isn't that there isn't enough good in the world but that we are trying to define what is good and what is not good.
Many of us want to "save the world" when it needs no such thing. We even go so far as working against natural geophysical processes, thinking that we are doing it, and ourselves, a favor.
We cannot see the forest for the trees. And we cannot see the trees because we think we have the greatest effect on the Earth. The beginning and the end, perhaps.
The "problem", if there ever was one, is that we continue to interfere in natural processes.
...all the while thinking that we are doing "good".
So the "problem" isn't that there isn't enough good in the world but that we are trying to define what is good and what is not good.
15
A thought takes on a 'life of its own' when it is entertained in your mind.
The same thought, when expressed*, becomes something else that is limited by more common denominators.
So you have more freedom in expressing Ec for yourself and are more limited in the expression when expressing it to others so that they can understand (and better-relate to) you.
Hope this helps.
*Though even the thought is an expression.
The same thought, when expressed*, becomes something else that is limited by more common denominators.
So you have more freedom in expressing Ec for yourself and are more limited in the expression when expressing it to others so that they can understand (and better-relate to) you.
Hope this helps.
*Though even the thought is an expression.
16
The forces of Western civilization are seeking to destroy the most democratic nation on Earth.
This is very symbolic.
Libya is a part of its own dream. It is thus destroying a future possibility, you could say. This "future" destruction is actually in the present. So a present value is being destroyed so we are seeing the effects of it.
In a way, we are destroying ourselves. No Chaol needed.
This is very symbolic.
Libya is a part of its own dream. It is thus destroying a future possibility, you could say. This "future" destruction is actually in the present. So a present value is being destroyed so we are seeing the effects of it.
In a way, we are destroying ourselves. No Chaol needed.
17
True such a being would be able to figure out what would logically come next in a person's experience.
But why would that being even bother? It is more efficient (energy-wise, or perception-wise) to not figure it out but instead be surprised by it.
If self-reflection is the answer, then surely we'll be reflecting until the shine falls off the mirror.
Without something apparently outside of the self, what could possibly be seen (or known)?
Would not something vastly different be an impetus for change?
And if that something is vastly different, would not something be destroyed in its wake?
Does the change come from without?
Is drastic change organic or is it alien?
I propose that "alien changes" destroy, they do not fix.
Fixing it would be a waste of energy. And how long have we been trying to 'fix' what we cannot properly define?
But why would that being even bother? It is more efficient (energy-wise, or perception-wise) to not figure it out but instead be surprised by it.
If self-reflection is the answer, then surely we'll be reflecting until the shine falls off the mirror.
Without something apparently outside of the self, what could possibly be seen (or known)?
Would not something vastly different be an impetus for change?
And if that something is vastly different, would not something be destroyed in its wake?
Does the change come from without?
Is drastic change organic or is it alien?
I propose that "alien changes" destroy, they do not fix.
Fixing it would be a waste of energy. And how long have we been trying to 'fix' what we cannot properly define?
18
It doesn't matter what "99.9%" of the world's population knows about what happened.
(Things certainly have an effect regardless, don't they?)
You will, indeed, be disappointed. (What you are looking for is not on these threads, in books, or in Alex's pocket. Seek the origin of your existence through conversation with those nearest you to find what is unexpected and cleverly placed between the Lines.)
But isn't that part of the plan when some of us play checkers and some of us play chess?
We are always looking for more than what our imagination will allow. That is the nature of a ceaseless imagination.
No matter what happens we will not be satisfied, because the nature and meaning would be unacceptable to our perceptual capacity.
(Things certainly have an effect regardless, don't they?)
You will, indeed, be disappointed. (What you are looking for is not on these threads, in books, or in Alex's pocket. Seek the origin of your existence through conversation with those nearest you to find what is unexpected and cleverly placed between the Lines.)
But isn't that part of the plan when some of us play checkers and some of us play chess?
We are always looking for more than what our imagination will allow. That is the nature of a ceaseless imagination.
No matter what happens we will not be satisfied, because the nature and meaning would be unacceptable to our perceptual capacity.
19
We experience in "surrounding" moments what is most relative and logical, all things considered.
We would do the same things because we would, in effect, be them.
We're not on autopilot, of course. You can decide whatever you want. Your will to choose is free.
But you are likely to choose what you have already chosen.
Your next moment is likely to look pretty much like those around it.
We would do the same things because we would, in effect, be them.
We're not on autopilot, of course. You can decide whatever you want. Your will to choose is free.
But you are likely to choose what you have already chosen.
Your next moment is likely to look pretty much like those around it.
20
We define what those values are.
Those values would not be the same for the "alien" civilization.
(But we like to think that they have the same values, even similar physical and biological attributes as we.)
1+1 is most often irrelevant.
We could be asking, "What do they value, and why?" if we really want to understand such an intelligence.
Most of the intelligence of Earth we have not yet discovered.
Those values would not be the same for the "alien" civilization.
(But we like to think that they have the same values, even similar physical and biological attributes as we.)
1+1 is most often irrelevant.
We could be asking, "What do they value, and why?" if we really want to understand such an intelligence.
Most of the intelligence of Earth we have not yet discovered.
21
Tangible as in being able to touch it?
Your world and the 'dream' world are combining. They both have physical, measurable properties. They can both be experienced, sensed, touched, etc.
During these months, yes, you will experience the world you are already in more and more.
Once you let go of old notions of how the world around you should be experienced, you will perceive what was already there.
I'm from the same world as you, so to speak. However, we split and we 'were' able to live within the dream world much earlier than you. This is happening now. (I don't say this for you, since you've already read my other thread many times. But for the benefit of others.)
Your world and the 'dream' world are combining. They both have physical, measurable properties. They can both be experienced, sensed, touched, etc.
During these months, yes, you will experience the world you are already in more and more.
Once you let go of old notions of how the world around you should be experienced, you will perceive what was already there.
I'm from the same world as you, so to speak. However, we split and we 'were' able to live within the dream world much earlier than you. This is happening now. (I don't say this for you, since you've already read my other thread many times. But for the benefit of others.)
22
There is only one perspective.
If you seek to 'heal' someone physically, seek out the non-physical reasons first.
The more important question is, why do you want to heal them?
Regardless, if you heal them then they would be 'healed' in all perspectives, each according to what is most relative to it. (A bit difficult to explain, since there is only one perspective.)
There is no sharing of reality. This gets into more advanced Ecsys and it's not really possible to discuss it without utilizing the proper language in which to do so.
However, the multiple realities are all values of the current perspective. Much the same way 34 years ago is a value of the present moment.
If you seek to 'heal' someone physically, seek out the non-physical reasons first.
The more important question is, why do you want to heal them?
Regardless, if you heal them then they would be 'healed' in all perspectives, each according to what is most relative to it. (A bit difficult to explain, since there is only one perspective.)
There is no sharing of reality. This gets into more advanced Ecsys and it's not really possible to discuss it without utilizing the proper language in which to do so.
However, the multiple realities are all values of the current perspective. Much the same way 34 years ago is a value of the present moment.
23
Greetings, everyone.
It is interesting to read many of the comments on this thread in my absence for the past couple of days.
I do owe you an apology for the misdirection with the "October 1 event".
If you know what happened at Farpoint Station (Star Trek: TNG) then you could probably guess that "Q" already knew what would happen and did not plan to destroy humanity. But he wanted to see how humans would respond in a chaotic situation.
Some clarification...
Yes, I am who I say I am. I am quite different from what you're used to, from "another world", and here for my own reasons.
You have only to carefully read my words in order to know that each has a deeper meaning than what may be readily apparent.
People on my world are quite different than people here. We look pretty much the same but speak and do different things for different reasons than you would find here. Often times in this world, I may ask someone a question that I already know the answer to just to see their response, for example. Sometimes I will forget or 'un-know' things in order to have a normal conversation and enjoy life.
Learning and understanding others, I think their more natural and immediate response is more telling than the scripted verbiage that usually comes out of their mouths. Catching someone by surprise is one of the better ways to really know a person. An other way of really getting to know someone is by how they are when they are upset or angry. In this way, thoughts are more primal and less controlled.
The point of my "October 1" prediction exercise was to proclaim "the doom you were obviously expecting" and see how you respond.
Although most of you did, indeed, find "the doom you were obviously expecting" (which is 'nothing happening/GLP effect/BS' etc) what interested me most was how your interference in natural processes was displayed, as is usually the case with this world.
In a way, I saw the more natural side of you. (i.e., how is this particular person when it is important?)
However, I never planned any "doom" for October 1. Should anything harmful have happened that day a lot of persons would, indeed, be upset at me for it being such a coincidence and me maybe having something to do with it.
I would not want to be in that position.
Am I capable of knowing with 'will' occur? Yes.
Is your world and my world merging? Yes.
Do I know the innermost details of every person that posts in this forum? Yes. (Read my posts carefully and perhaps you will see a glimpse of it.)
Am I capable of creating any kind of destruction imaginable in this world? Yes.
Is everything that I wrote (aside from October 1) accurate? Yes.
Can I already do the things I say you will do one day? Yes.
Do I care to prove any of this? No.
The thing is, I don't have to prove it. I live it regardless of whether or not anyone is convinced.
If you are walking down the street and someone asks you if you can lift a rock on the ground, you would probably think twice about responding. Even fewer of you would prove that you could, even if you could.
Such powers do not need to be proven. But perhaps in our conversations and interactions we can help each other as friends.
I actually don't want to convince you that I am capable of something, even thought I knew exactly what would happen in Japan, with the Virginia earthquake, September 23, and withany event or process for the previous or next 20 years or so (less so the less relative the time conditions are).
If you've read my other thread you will know that I feel the message should be separated from the messenger with this (and other) material. I've previously mentioned that I'm not aiming for credibility. (Credibility is partially why your social and political systems seems to be a mess right now.)
Can you imagine how much of a prophet I would become if there was "doom" on October 1? My message would get lost in the noise.
Such experiences are unnecessary for me and detract from the core of the reason I care to post and respond on this forum (and create a website).
The question, "Why should Western civilization be saved?" is still an important question but it is important for you and those around you. Thank you all for your responses.
I will not answer questions about what will happen this year or next year in the same way that you would not pick up the rock to satisfy someone's curiosity. It is more important for you to figure it out for yourself that (as I continue to mention) whensomething happens is not important, but how and why are.
Really, it is interesting that most of the (vocal) persons in this forum want and desire "doom" and destruction, and get upset when a promised doom date passes with no such doom having taken place.
Were you eagerly awaiting something to happen? Were you looking forward or even a bit afraid of October 1? If so, why?
(What's interesting are all the people who get angry a few hours into the day, some even after a few minutes!)
I will not tell you what events will occur tomorrow or next week. I will give you some hints not because I want you to know but as part of a normal conversation. I will continue to speak with you as a friend in a two-way conversation, giving and taking as people normally do (rather than a one-way fresk show).
Most of what I know I am unable to explain to you here. I am illustrating the basics of some of what I know and understand. Telling you things directly is sometimes not possible, and sometimes not for the best (all things considered).
Regarding the question, "Why should Western civilization be saved?" no one talked about the natural course of events (or anything similar) in response. Most all of the responses were, unfortunately, focused more on what each person wanted for themselves.
And that is the point.
Western civilization, which influences the lives of billions of people in this world, interferes in the natural process much more than do other societies. For example, we have moved from working with our children to leaving them in the care of strangers or, oftentimes, themselves. Such things are called progress or necessities for the world we live in. We then take basic inventions, like light bulbs, and outlaw them and replace them with something toxic all while calling the replacement "green". (Yes, your "green" not only goes against what you would call nature but is actually killing you, and making others go hungry.)
I ask each of you to look at your own responses and ask the question, "Do I care more about how and why, or what and when?"
Western civilization is destroying itself. There is no need for me to interfere. My work is much different than what you'd expect and, although important, is not something that anyone in this world would understand (yet).
(I chose the nickname "Chaol" because it represents "chaos" which, as I've mentioned before, is an order that we do not yet understand.)
It would not be expected that most of you really know or understand what I am talking about, but I still welcome your response and conversation.
Your responses will illustrate to yourself how you really feel and think.
It is interesting to read many of the comments on this thread in my absence for the past couple of days.
I do owe you an apology for the misdirection with the "October 1 event".
If you know what happened at Farpoint Station (Star Trek: TNG) then you could probably guess that "Q" already knew what would happen and did not plan to destroy humanity. But he wanted to see how humans would respond in a chaotic situation.
Some clarification...
Yes, I am who I say I am. I am quite different from what you're used to, from "another world", and here for my own reasons.
You have only to carefully read my words in order to know that each has a deeper meaning than what may be readily apparent.
People on my world are quite different than people here. We look pretty much the same but speak and do different things for different reasons than you would find here. Often times in this world, I may ask someone a question that I already know the answer to just to see their response, for example. Sometimes I will forget or 'un-know' things in order to have a normal conversation and enjoy life.
Learning and understanding others, I think their more natural and immediate response is more telling than the scripted verbiage that usually comes out of their mouths. Catching someone by surprise is one of the better ways to really know a person. An other way of really getting to know someone is by how they are when they are upset or angry. In this way, thoughts are more primal and less controlled.
The point of my "October 1" prediction exercise was to proclaim "the doom you were obviously expecting" and see how you respond.
Although most of you did, indeed, find "the doom you were obviously expecting" (which is 'nothing happening/GLP effect/BS' etc) what interested me most was how your interference in natural processes was displayed, as is usually the case with this world.
In a way, I saw the more natural side of you. (i.e., how is this particular person when it is important?)
However, I never planned any "doom" for October 1. Should anything harmful have happened that day a lot of persons would, indeed, be upset at me for it being such a coincidence and me maybe having something to do with it.
I would not want to be in that position.
Am I capable of knowing with 'will' occur? Yes.
Is your world and my world merging? Yes.
Do I know the innermost details of every person that posts in this forum? Yes. (Read my posts carefully and perhaps you will see a glimpse of it.)
Am I capable of creating any kind of destruction imaginable in this world? Yes.
Is everything that I wrote (aside from October 1) accurate? Yes.
Can I already do the things I say you will do one day? Yes.
Do I care to prove any of this? No.
The thing is, I don't have to prove it. I live it regardless of whether or not anyone is convinced.
If you are walking down the street and someone asks you if you can lift a rock on the ground, you would probably think twice about responding. Even fewer of you would prove that you could, even if you could.
Such powers do not need to be proven. But perhaps in our conversations and interactions we can help each other as friends.
I actually don't want to convince you that I am capable of something, even thought I knew exactly what would happen in Japan, with the Virginia earthquake, September 23, and withany event or process for the previous or next 20 years or so (less so the less relative the time conditions are).
If you've read my other thread you will know that I feel the message should be separated from the messenger with this (and other) material. I've previously mentioned that I'm not aiming for credibility. (Credibility is partially why your social and political systems seems to be a mess right now.)
Can you imagine how much of a prophet I would become if there was "doom" on October 1? My message would get lost in the noise.
Such experiences are unnecessary for me and detract from the core of the reason I care to post and respond on this forum (and create a website).
The question, "Why should Western civilization be saved?" is still an important question but it is important for you and those around you. Thank you all for your responses.
I will not answer questions about what will happen this year or next year in the same way that you would not pick up the rock to satisfy someone's curiosity. It is more important for you to figure it out for yourself that (as I continue to mention) whensomething happens is not important, but how and why are.
Really, it is interesting that most of the (vocal) persons in this forum want and desire "doom" and destruction, and get upset when a promised doom date passes with no such doom having taken place.
Were you eagerly awaiting something to happen? Were you looking forward or even a bit afraid of October 1? If so, why?
(What's interesting are all the people who get angry a few hours into the day, some even after a few minutes!)
I will not tell you what events will occur tomorrow or next week. I will give you some hints not because I want you to know but as part of a normal conversation. I will continue to speak with you as a friend in a two-way conversation, giving and taking as people normally do (rather than a one-way fresk show).
Most of what I know I am unable to explain to you here. I am illustrating the basics of some of what I know and understand. Telling you things directly is sometimes not possible, and sometimes not for the best (all things considered).
Regarding the question, "Why should Western civilization be saved?" no one talked about the natural course of events (or anything similar) in response. Most all of the responses were, unfortunately, focused more on what each person wanted for themselves.
And that is the point.
Western civilization, which influences the lives of billions of people in this world, interferes in the natural process much more than do other societies. For example, we have moved from working with our children to leaving them in the care of strangers or, oftentimes, themselves. Such things are called progress or necessities for the world we live in. We then take basic inventions, like light bulbs, and outlaw them and replace them with something toxic all while calling the replacement "green". (Yes, your "green" not only goes against what you would call nature but is actually killing you, and making others go hungry.)
I ask each of you to look at your own responses and ask the question, "Do I care more about how and why, or what and when?"
Western civilization is destroying itself. There is no need for me to interfere. My work is much different than what you'd expect and, although important, is not something that anyone in this world would understand (yet).
(I chose the nickname "Chaol" because it represents "chaos" which, as I've mentioned before, is an order that we do not yet understand.)
It would not be expected that most of you really know or understand what I am talking about, but I still welcome your response and conversation.
Your responses will illustrate to yourself how you really feel and think.
24
The short of it (as I know that most of you don't actually read something longer than 4 lines)...
Yes, it was a lesson. (And we all failed.)
And, yes, I am who I say I am (but have no need to prove it, much to your disappointment).
Friends?
Yes, it was a lesson. (And we all failed.)
And, yes, I am who I say I am (but have no need to prove it, much to your disappointment).
Friends?
25
I wonder what anyone would have done if this October 1 event: Thread: This Sun Grazing Comet Is NOT a Small Comet...
was really serious.
Would you still have wanted doom after a week of experiencing the effects?
Something to think about...
was really serious.
Would you still have wanted doom after a week of experiencing the effects?
Something to think about...
26
There is only you, in seemingly endless reflection.
Our interactions with others bring our self more into focus. (But I'm sure you knew that.)
It will pass in a short time, and you will be stronger (and wiser) for it.
Sharing any fears you have will probably make it less relevant for you in the future.
Our interactions with others bring our self more into focus. (But I'm sure you knew that.)
It will pass in a short time, and you will be stronger (and wiser) for it.
Sharing any fears you have will probably make it less relevant for you in the future.
27
My ultimate agenda is to understand this world better than I do in order to 'port' certain things over, I suppose you could say. Kind of like making a translation.
And now we are in the last act of "Contact" where Ellie is before a committee discussing what happened.
Perhaps some of us will never know.
Some crazy guy on the internet made a prediction that "the doom you were obviously expecting" will occur on October 1 on a thread referencing the first Star Trek episode which coincidentally (?) aired the same day he made the post, 24 years earlier, which was about saving humanity from destruction.
The day before October 1 he said, "It teeters on the edge.. and all it needs is a little kick. Perhaps a little ejection." and coincidentally (?) the next day an object thrashed near the sun, sending out massive ejections of energy in the direction of Earth.
But again the day before he said that we will all be disappointed on October 1.
The point is that if some was disappointed that there was no doom on October 1, it's because they:
1) haven't been paying attention, and/or
2) really want doom to occur and are disappointed when it doesn't happen
So hopefully a lot more people on this website can stop wishing for doom and realize what is going on around them now and participate more in its 'creation'.
We can do fantastic things together, but we need your active participation. Don't just sit on the sidelines.
Let's figure it out together. (A cliché that works!)
And now we are in the last act of "Contact" where Ellie is before a committee discussing what happened.
Perhaps some of us will never know.
Some crazy guy on the internet made a prediction that "the doom you were obviously expecting" will occur on October 1 on a thread referencing the first Star Trek episode which coincidentally (?) aired the same day he made the post, 24 years earlier, which was about saving humanity from destruction.
The day before October 1 he said, "It teeters on the edge.. and all it needs is a little kick. Perhaps a little ejection." and coincidentally (?) the next day an object thrashed near the sun, sending out massive ejections of energy in the direction of Earth.
But again the day before he said that we will all be disappointed on October 1.
The point is that if some was disappointed that there was no doom on October 1, it's because they:
1) haven't been paying attention, and/or
2) really want doom to occur and are disappointed when it doesn't happen
So hopefully a lot more people on this website can stop wishing for doom and realize what is going on around them now and participate more in its 'creation'.
We can do fantastic things together, but we need your active participation. Don't just sit on the sidelines.
Let's figure it out together. (A cliché that works!)
28
It's good that we each have our own personalities. It makes us more interesting as an individual being, I think.
From my perspective I don't see "failed prophecy". I did apologize for the misdirection, however I don't think it could be said that I was "lying".
As I've often said (and said on the post to which you responded) I am not aiming for credibility.
(Future discussions are only 'tainted', as you say, to those who I would not really be able to have proper discourse with.)
I suppose I am looking at the big picture in a way that is most comfortable to me. (Chess not checkers, I suppose.)
Your paragraph about offering a poem seems to contradict the one above it. Perhaps I am mistaken.
Destruction, by the way, is the same as what you call creation. There is no difference, except that nothing is created or destroyed. Things become less and more relevant (attraction and repulsion) but even this is putting it is readily-available terms.
What process isn't chaotic to an other perspective? It doesn't have to be looked upon favorably by people you know in order to be vitally important to their existence.
Things works regardless of whether or not we know about it.
If I say that anything is possible with an understanding of 'Ecsys prime' then it is only those drinking "weak beer" that do not understand it's possibilities.
Given a choice between teleportation and creating world peace, which do you think is more natural? (and possible)
From my perspective I don't see "failed prophecy". I did apologize for the misdirection, however I don't think it could be said that I was "lying".
As I've often said (and said on the post to which you responded) I am not aiming for credibility.
(Future discussions are only 'tainted', as you say, to those who I would not really be able to have proper discourse with.)
I suppose I am looking at the big picture in a way that is most comfortable to me. (Chess not checkers, I suppose.)
Your paragraph about offering a poem seems to contradict the one above it. Perhaps I am mistaken.
Destruction, by the way, is the same as what you call creation. There is no difference, except that nothing is created or destroyed. Things become less and more relevant (attraction and repulsion) but even this is putting it is readily-available terms.
What process isn't chaotic to an other perspective? It doesn't have to be looked upon favorably by people you know in order to be vitally important to their existence.
Things works regardless of whether or not we know about it.
If I say that anything is possible with an understanding of 'Ecsys prime' then it is only those drinking "weak beer" that do not understand it's possibilities.
Given a choice between teleportation and creating world peace, which do you think is more natural? (and possible)
29
When you resist what you perceive, you are resisting your perspective. And are thus resisting yourself, and creating more of what you resist.
It sounds like you are separating your perspective from yourself. How could anyone be 'happy' doing that?
Each is you in a different perspective, you could say.
More accurately, you can experience only your own perception.
It sounds like you are separating your perspective from yourself. How could anyone be 'happy' doing that?
Each is you in a different perspective, you could say.
More accurately, you can experience only your own perception.
30
Often, we care not to find out why we are perceiving something.
In this way we play the victim without knowing it, thinking that things happen regardless of whether we perceive it or not. (Some even think that they should experience it simply because it exists. The question for them would be, "why are you drawn to those perceptions?")
In this way we play the victim without knowing it, thinking that things happen regardless of whether we perceive it or not. (Some even think that they should experience it simply because it exists. The question for them would be, "why are you drawn to those perceptions?")
31
We not only perceive that which is easiest to perceive but do that which is easiest (most relative) to do.
It may be easier for someone to continue doing things that harm them, for example, if it is relative to their experience (all things considered).
When we think. "Why does that person do that?" then we can think either because they want to or, perhaps more accurately, because it is most relative to their perspective.
When someone claims they don't want to experience or perceive "bad" things but continue to, it's because they don't understand what they really want.
This, of course, would lead to all sorts of questions about people being abused, suffering, killed, etc.
When was the last time anything bad happened in your dreams? Did it seem real? Did you want it to happen or what it just the most logical thing at the time (all things considered)?
It may be easier for someone to continue doing things that harm them, for example, if it is relative to their experience (all things considered).
When we think. "Why does that person do that?" then we can think either because they want to or, perhaps more accurately, because it is most relative to their perspective.
When someone claims they don't want to experience or perceive "bad" things but continue to, it's because they don't understand what they really want.
This, of course, would lead to all sorts of questions about people being abused, suffering, killed, etc.
When was the last time anything bad happened in your dreams? Did it seem real? Did you want it to happen or what it just the most logical thing at the time (all things considered)?
32
For example, when you don't like or want something you are resisting what you perceive.
I'm not suggesting you accept everything that comes your way and integrate it into your life but what I am saying is that when you perceive something you don't like that is 100% you.
When you actively resist you then you will experience difficulties.
Learn to not resist, and those difficulties will disappear.
Regarding the calendar, the Mayan calendar does not "end" at all in the way I think you're talking about.
For an explanation of the calendar (and mis-interpretations) see [link to www.2012.com.au]
I'm not suggesting you accept everything that comes your way and integrate it into your life but what I am saying is that when you perceive something you don't like that is 100% you.
When you actively resist you then you will experience difficulties.
Learn to not resist, and those difficulties will disappear.
Regarding the calendar, the Mayan calendar does not "end" at all in the way I think you're talking about.
For an explanation of the calendar (and mis-interpretations) see [link to www.2012.com.au]
33
It would seem that we 'create' the Mayan culture as much as it has created itself.
Anything could be fascinating once we mold it into our own shapes, and project things onto it.
Many of the "alien" civilizations that come into contact with us are actually beings more of this world. Although a somewhat different physicality, they exist here and now.
We just think of time the way we do because it is convenient.
But the reality is much more fascinating.
Anything could be fascinating once we mold it into our own shapes, and project things onto it.
Many of the "alien" civilizations that come into contact with us are actually beings more of this world. Although a somewhat different physicality, they exist here and now.
We just think of time the way we do because it is convenient.
But the reality is much more fascinating.
34
Dreaming is what you call life from a physically different perspective.
We have the capacity to physically change what we are on a moment-to-moment basis.
However, we set rules for this process in order to function. I don't mean that we just set rules for sleeping and waking up. I mean more of an "I won't perceive that because it doesn't make sense to me now" sort of rule.
You are always dreaming, however.
Some examples of making this change are:
-walking down the street
-hitting our head
-touching something
-sensing anything (seeing, hearing, etc)
In other words, you do it all the time.
But when that something is very different from your current perspective you think of it as a dream (or remember it as a dream).
It also might be that you don't perceive it, or you block it out entirely for your immediate perception.
Again, it's not that you dream when you fall asleep. It's that you are experiencing something now that does not become relevant to you until you are in a different state. (Even though, too, that state is now.)
We have the capacity to physically change what we are on a moment-to-moment basis.
However, we set rules for this process in order to function. I don't mean that we just set rules for sleeping and waking up. I mean more of an "I won't perceive that because it doesn't make sense to me now" sort of rule.
You are always dreaming, however.
Some examples of making this change are:
-walking down the street
-hitting our head
-touching something
-sensing anything (seeing, hearing, etc)
In other words, you do it all the time.
But when that something is very different from your current perspective you think of it as a dream (or remember it as a dream).
It also might be that you don't perceive it, or you block it out entirely for your immediate perception.
Again, it's not that you dream when you fall asleep. It's that you are experiencing something now that does not become relevant to you until you are in a different state. (Even though, too, that state is now.)
35
Radiation from sources like mobile phones help to release the mercury vapor from the encasement. Not all lights are manufactured perfectly, so a house full of these bulbs is bound to have at least 1 spilling mercury.
And as you may know, when a standard CFL bulb is broken it exceeds mercury limits set by the EPA by about 30,000%
The best shield is not to use it.
And as you may know, when a standard CFL bulb is broken it exceeds mercury limits set by the EPA by about 30,000%
The best shield is not to use it.
36
The earthquakes outside are the earthquakes inside.
Sounds corny, doesn't it?
Corny but true!
Elenin/Earth/Nibiru/space et cetera and experiences thereof
An earthquake is not an earthquake if you are not in it.
"You cannot see beyond your own perceptions"
Please see the following post: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
There does not need to be an actual earthquake outside of your perspective.
There only needs to be news of the earthquake.
So where is the earthquake? Where is Nibiru? Where is Elenin? Or the Mayans, Egyptians, etc?
They exist entirely within your perception. Using as little 'energy' as possible (as does everything else).
Sounds corny, doesn't it?
Corny but true!
Elenin/Earth/Nibiru/space et cetera and experiences thereof
An earthquake is not an earthquake if you are not in it.
"You cannot see beyond your own perceptions"
Please see the following post: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
There does not need to be an actual earthquake outside of your perspective.
There only needs to be news of the earthquake.
So where is the earthquake? Where is Nibiru? Where is Elenin? Or the Mayans, Egyptians, etc?
They exist entirely within your perception. Using as little 'energy' as possible (as does everything else).
37
Yes, the "October 1" event was of the Sun.
The Sun plays a major role in relationships on Earth. It is, you could say, the father is physicality.
The September 9 and October 1 events represent changes in the physical world.
As I mentioned, your world is merging with the dream world (it already has).
These energies, you could say, change your physicality from what you've known it to be over the years to something like dream physicality.
(The dream world is also physical, but a different kind of physicality than you're used to. The lights and sounds around you are also physical.)
The Sun plays a major role in relationships on Earth. It is, you could say, the father is physicality.
The September 9 and October 1 events represent changes in the physical world.
As I mentioned, your world is merging with the dream world (it already has).
These energies, you could say, change your physicality from what you've known it to be over the years to something like dream physicality.
(The dream world is also physical, but a different kind of physicality than you're used to. The lights and sounds around you are also physical.)
38
Following on...
Ecsys holds that we experience what is most logical to our current perspective, all things considered.
More accurately, we experience that which takes the least amount of energy to experience 'next' (or remember).
You have a choice, yes. But the choice is the mass of relationships that you've accumulated. What happens 'next' (or what you remember happened) you could say, is not your choice directly but a choice of your relationships.
(Not entirely accurate but close enough considering the language limitations.)
Ecsys holds that we experience what is most logical to our current perspective, all things considered.
More accurately, we experience that which takes the least amount of energy to experience 'next' (or remember).
You have a choice, yes. But the choice is the mass of relationships that you've accumulated. What happens 'next' (or what you remember happened) you could say, is not your choice directly but a choice of your relationships.
(Not entirely accurate but close enough considering the language limitations.)
39
When we cannot see the forest for the tress, it is time to stop climbing them.
When we resist an other's expressions, we ourselves express anger in our own perspective.
The question becomes: why the hostility and anger towards your own perceptions?
Is it easier to say "bullshit" than to actually think for your self and accept your perception of it?
You need not sign your name in blood, but do you see the futility of getting upset at yourself?
When we resist an other's expressions, we ourselves express anger in our own perspective.
The question becomes: why the hostility and anger towards your own perceptions?
Is it easier to say "bullshit" than to actually think for your self and accept your perception of it?
You need not sign your name in blood, but do you see the futility of getting upset at yourself?
40
Welcome to the dream world.
Or perhaps you realize you are (were) already there?
Making associations is a good thing. Hopefully, we will all be able to make quick associations and have less wait time between thinking of something and experiencing it.
So, let me make sure I "understand" or instead that I am communicating this "concept" or "symbol" as effectively as I can (since it exists within my perspective as I see it and your perspective as an interpretation of my words on this forum based on your perception of my intention. I hope this is right).
All that can exist, already exists. Anything can exist. There are not necessarily infinite "possibilities" but instead there are 0 Mu +P P restrictions on what can exist and they're all from the perspective of an observer (namely me, to me).
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Or perhaps just one possibility: perspective. Endlessly ramified (seemingly) in order to make it more or less relevant to the various aspects of itself.
The individual perspectives are "cross sections"(slices) of the whole or what some may define as god(all perspectives, yet no perspectives). If no energy exists beyond "my" perspective how can "I" be a "cross section" or slice of a "whole", unless you're implying, which I think you are, that I am not limited to my perspective, I can move about within my perspective freely, then there is no paradox, the "whole" is "me".
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Your perspective is all there is. So, in this way, limitation is irrelevant.
Then the whole would not be you, per se, but would exist entirely 'within' your perspective.
Perspective is indivisible. But in order to exist we must perceive one thing as being different from an other. In this way, it seems that we are both separate and linked at the same time.
Wouldn't this imply "I" am the "observer", the "chooser" of the "whole" and everything being "observed" is simply "me", an albeit more distant "me", depending on how relative "me" is?
Quoting: MutantMessiah
You're asking some controversial questions but of course I will do my best to respond. Please consider that nothing of what I am about to say is true.
There is no thing being observed because observation is irrelevant. (If perspective is indivisible then there nothing observes or is observed.)
Choices are not made, except for when it is an illusion of the senses you 'create' in order to seem like you exist.
You have it all mapped out before you.
The things that you perceive most are most relevant to you. From your physical body to your family and friends to the Earth.
The more 'distant' it is the less relevant it is to what you are.
At the edge of this perspective there is nothing because everything is already contained in your perspective. (Every possible relationship.)
When 'nothing' cannot be contained it appears infinite and endless. We cannot express 'nothing' so we end up with an infinite universe that does not actually exist (existance is irrelevant to itself).
So, I am all of "this", but I am not really any of "this", you(everything) don't(doesn't) actually exist independent of my observation and I am just the point of perspective (absorbing, interpreting and accepting my observations, reinforcing my perspective's "symbol" or "paradigm")?
Quoting: MutantMessiah
You also don't exist independent of your observation, it could be said.
However, we are the same thing because when youperceive anything you are experiencing your perceptions. (i.e., you are perceiving you)
I suppose all this implies that I understand you correctly. (I have to, because my understanding is based in perspective, yet you could come back saying I am completely wrong in turn I would be changing my perspective, using you).
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Your perception of me matches your understanding of me and relevance to your total experience.
If it is not in your perspective (somehow, somewhere, and of some value) then it need not be because it is not relevant for now.
From my perspective, you(Chaol) don't really need a body, you have a "forum login" and to me, you don't have a body. You exist only as a jumbled up bunch of text(that I see as "symbol") on a computer screen that is a jumbled up bunch of pixels which is made of jumbled up bunches of smaller "particles" (symbols within symbols within symbols) etc... I "assume" a body exists (because you said it does and I believe you, it takes the least amount of energy to exist in my perspective), creating the ecsys.org, posting here to "transfer" or "relay" this information to me, but that is a "preconceived" relationship that I assume must exist in order for this experience to play out as it is. This is all essentially a dialog with "myself."
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Funny.. neither do you (need a body).
You are literally talking to yourself when you talk to others.
How ingenious is this?
You know yourself better than anyone (because there is no one else). You then made it seem like there is, indeed, something else in order to not only perceive yourself but to learn how to perceive yourself.
In effect, you are trying to exist.
You are trying something that is 'impossible' (read: irrelevant) because there is nothing else to do.
If you did not try to exist then it would not seem like you do exist.
I understand nothing "has to" exist beyond my perception and that my "assumption" that you have a perspective yourself is invalid, because I only assume you have a perspective, because I do. I am inferring that because you're interacting with me, you are "like" me.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
When you are perceiving something, you are perceiving yourself.
Your friends are no different.
I am no different.
It is the same perception.
My perspective is 'within' your perspective because it is the same perspective (indivisible).
I started existing at some point, I don't currently recall when that was (nor will I ever be able to, because when I believe I have, my understanding of my creation will just be a "symbol", forever beyond my "complete" understanding), but I have built relationships (elaborate justifications that are really just "symbols" within my greater paradigm) to validate my existence.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
That point is now.
Before now, you do not exist.
There is nothing to recall, because all memories are not things that happened in the past but values of 'now'.
You cannot perceive it this way (considering the limitations of the relationships you have set up for now) so it seems like things are separate.
It seems like you are not the chair you sit in, your hands, that your stomach has a mind of its own, you do not know your body intimately. It also seems like you are not your friends, family, society, etc, and that there is a past, present, and future.
All these things are the same thing, seemingly endless and separate because you cannot possibly contain 'nothing' in one perspective.
It is "like" I started dreaming, immediately recognized my mother/father/gravity/time/home/siblings/language etc and began forming more "intricate" relationships leading to where I am today, only because I "expected" things to play out as they did, given my current perspective and/or paradigm. Reflecting on my existence, I could have just as easily come into "existence" now, at this moment with the assumption that I have had 30 years of life "experience" here.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Perhaps that is what you are doing. (You would never know it, would you?)
If at each moment there is endless value in all directions things would seem entirely separate because it is seemingly so vast.
If you came into existence a second ago, let's say, then it would seem like you've been living in this world for ages and that you did such-and-such last week and have those friends, etc.
Isn't this what happens when you dream? You drop into a life that has been existing before you got there, so to speak?
It is what is happening now because your perspective is what you would call the entire universe (although most of the universe is not relative to what you are; the real universe is whatever you are perceiving right now; in it, atoms do not exist but tables do, for example).
My past is not what led to this moment, as you say, my past is the most "logical" or "efficient" way for me to "believe" or for "energy to be conserved" at this moment because of my perspective. I am pushing back non-existence with "discovery" or "experience" in perspective, forever finding relationships for my current perspective to interact with. If I ceased to believe that I had a perspective, I would cease to exist.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Impressive :)
However, your 'belief' is irrelevant.
The only thing that matters is the geometry of relationships which, as it happens, is sometimes interpreted as 'belief'.
All I am is an observer, seeking relevance to exist. When I observe, I do so from my perspective. I am perceiving an overarching all encompassing "symbol". The symbol can be divided into logic, possibility, interaction and "lesser" symbol. Each of those elements of the "omega symbol" or the symbol I hold to represent my observation in it's entirety can again be divided into more relative (+), standard (neutral) or less (-) relative versions of each, with relationship to "my perspective."
Quoting: MutantMessiah
In this physical existence, it is 4 elements. But really there is 1. (And even further, there is none.)
I suppose that is where my understanding of your EC currently ends. Flash cards help to memorize EC, I understand the concept of an input and an output but I haven't quite grasped the input/output in relation to the elements. I've just been guessing and assuming I am right.
After reconsidering all the above, could you (Chaol) or anyone else with a better grasp, help me to better understand (adjust my perspective) to see what exactly we mean in EC when we say input and output? How does that relate to the high/neutral/low aspects of each element and why/how it applies to concepts?
I assume that "TA"(like in taboo) for instance -P +L ec#9 is something akin to, well I dunno. This is where I am lost. I can guess, and if I do it'd be something like the actual word "Taboo", relative to me, something that is taboo (to me) is something I would personally consider irrational or inappropriate for me to do therefore a low possibility from my perspective that I'd consider it close to me? High logic because it's easy to define something as taboo, or unaccepted? Lol, I have no clue, like I said guessing... could use a little guidance.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
See here [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] for some guidance.
Or perhaps you realize you are (were) already there?
Making associations is a good thing. Hopefully, we will all be able to make quick associations and have less wait time between thinking of something and experiencing it.
So, let me make sure I "understand" or instead that I am communicating this "concept" or "symbol" as effectively as I can (since it exists within my perspective as I see it and your perspective as an interpretation of my words on this forum based on your perception of my intention. I hope this is right).
All that can exist, already exists. Anything can exist. There are not necessarily infinite "possibilities" but instead there are 0 Mu +P P restrictions on what can exist and they're all from the perspective of an observer (namely me, to me).
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Or perhaps just one possibility: perspective. Endlessly ramified (seemingly) in order to make it more or less relevant to the various aspects of itself.
The individual perspectives are "cross sections"(slices) of the whole or what some may define as god(all perspectives, yet no perspectives). If no energy exists beyond "my" perspective how can "I" be a "cross section" or slice of a "whole", unless you're implying, which I think you are, that I am not limited to my perspective, I can move about within my perspective freely, then there is no paradox, the "whole" is "me".
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Your perspective is all there is. So, in this way, limitation is irrelevant.
Then the whole would not be you, per se, but would exist entirely 'within' your perspective.
Perspective is indivisible. But in order to exist we must perceive one thing as being different from an other. In this way, it seems that we are both separate and linked at the same time.
Wouldn't this imply "I" am the "observer", the "chooser" of the "whole" and everything being "observed" is simply "me", an albeit more distant "me", depending on how relative "me" is?
Quoting: MutantMessiah
You're asking some controversial questions but of course I will do my best to respond. Please consider that nothing of what I am about to say is true.
There is no thing being observed because observation is irrelevant. (If perspective is indivisible then there nothing observes or is observed.)
Choices are not made, except for when it is an illusion of the senses you 'create' in order to seem like you exist.
You have it all mapped out before you.
The things that you perceive most are most relevant to you. From your physical body to your family and friends to the Earth.
The more 'distant' it is the less relevant it is to what you are.
At the edge of this perspective there is nothing because everything is already contained in your perspective. (Every possible relationship.)
When 'nothing' cannot be contained it appears infinite and endless. We cannot express 'nothing' so we end up with an infinite universe that does not actually exist (existance is irrelevant to itself).
So, I am all of "this", but I am not really any of "this", you(everything) don't(doesn't) actually exist independent of my observation and I am just the point of perspective (absorbing, interpreting and accepting my observations, reinforcing my perspective's "symbol" or "paradigm")?
Quoting: MutantMessiah
You also don't exist independent of your observation, it could be said.
However, we are the same thing because when youperceive anything you are experiencing your perceptions. (i.e., you are perceiving you)
I suppose all this implies that I understand you correctly. (I have to, because my understanding is based in perspective, yet you could come back saying I am completely wrong in turn I would be changing my perspective, using you).
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Your perception of me matches your understanding of me and relevance to your total experience.
If it is not in your perspective (somehow, somewhere, and of some value) then it need not be because it is not relevant for now.
From my perspective, you(Chaol) don't really need a body, you have a "forum login" and to me, you don't have a body. You exist only as a jumbled up bunch of text(that I see as "symbol") on a computer screen that is a jumbled up bunch of pixels which is made of jumbled up bunches of smaller "particles" (symbols within symbols within symbols) etc... I "assume" a body exists (because you said it does and I believe you, it takes the least amount of energy to exist in my perspective), creating the ecsys.org, posting here to "transfer" or "relay" this information to me, but that is a "preconceived" relationship that I assume must exist in order for this experience to play out as it is. This is all essentially a dialog with "myself."
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Funny.. neither do you (need a body).
You are literally talking to yourself when you talk to others.
How ingenious is this?
You know yourself better than anyone (because there is no one else). You then made it seem like there is, indeed, something else in order to not only perceive yourself but to learn how to perceive yourself.
In effect, you are trying to exist.
You are trying something that is 'impossible' (read: irrelevant) because there is nothing else to do.
If you did not try to exist then it would not seem like you do exist.
I understand nothing "has to" exist beyond my perception and that my "assumption" that you have a perspective yourself is invalid, because I only assume you have a perspective, because I do. I am inferring that because you're interacting with me, you are "like" me.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
When you are perceiving something, you are perceiving yourself.
Your friends are no different.
I am no different.
It is the same perception.
My perspective is 'within' your perspective because it is the same perspective (indivisible).
I started existing at some point, I don't currently recall when that was (nor will I ever be able to, because when I believe I have, my understanding of my creation will just be a "symbol", forever beyond my "complete" understanding), but I have built relationships (elaborate justifications that are really just "symbols" within my greater paradigm) to validate my existence.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
That point is now.
Before now, you do not exist.
There is nothing to recall, because all memories are not things that happened in the past but values of 'now'.
You cannot perceive it this way (considering the limitations of the relationships you have set up for now) so it seems like things are separate.
It seems like you are not the chair you sit in, your hands, that your stomach has a mind of its own, you do not know your body intimately. It also seems like you are not your friends, family, society, etc, and that there is a past, present, and future.
All these things are the same thing, seemingly endless and separate because you cannot possibly contain 'nothing' in one perspective.
It is "like" I started dreaming, immediately recognized my mother/father/gravity/time/home/siblings/language etc and began forming more "intricate" relationships leading to where I am today, only because I "expected" things to play out as they did, given my current perspective and/or paradigm. Reflecting on my existence, I could have just as easily come into "existence" now, at this moment with the assumption that I have had 30 years of life "experience" here.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Perhaps that is what you are doing. (You would never know it, would you?)
If at each moment there is endless value in all directions things would seem entirely separate because it is seemingly so vast.
If you came into existence a second ago, let's say, then it would seem like you've been living in this world for ages and that you did such-and-such last week and have those friends, etc.
Isn't this what happens when you dream? You drop into a life that has been existing before you got there, so to speak?
It is what is happening now because your perspective is what you would call the entire universe (although most of the universe is not relative to what you are; the real universe is whatever you are perceiving right now; in it, atoms do not exist but tables do, for example).
My past is not what led to this moment, as you say, my past is the most "logical" or "efficient" way for me to "believe" or for "energy to be conserved" at this moment because of my perspective. I am pushing back non-existence with "discovery" or "experience" in perspective, forever finding relationships for my current perspective to interact with. If I ceased to believe that I had a perspective, I would cease to exist.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
Impressive :)
However, your 'belief' is irrelevant.
The only thing that matters is the geometry of relationships which, as it happens, is sometimes interpreted as 'belief'.
All I am is an observer, seeking relevance to exist. When I observe, I do so from my perspective. I am perceiving an overarching all encompassing "symbol". The symbol can be divided into logic, possibility, interaction and "lesser" symbol. Each of those elements of the "omega symbol" or the symbol I hold to represent my observation in it's entirety can again be divided into more relative (+), standard (neutral) or less (-) relative versions of each, with relationship to "my perspective."
Quoting: MutantMessiah
In this physical existence, it is 4 elements. But really there is 1. (And even further, there is none.)
I suppose that is where my understanding of your EC currently ends. Flash cards help to memorize EC, I understand the concept of an input and an output but I haven't quite grasped the input/output in relation to the elements. I've just been guessing and assuming I am right.
After reconsidering all the above, could you (Chaol) or anyone else with a better grasp, help me to better understand (adjust my perspective) to see what exactly we mean in EC when we say input and output? How does that relate to the high/neutral/low aspects of each element and why/how it applies to concepts?
I assume that "TA"(like in taboo) for instance -P +L ec#9 is something akin to, well I dunno. This is where I am lost. I can guess, and if I do it'd be something like the actual word "Taboo", relative to me, something that is taboo (to me) is something I would personally consider irrational or inappropriate for me to do therefore a low possibility from my perspective that I'd consider it close to me? High logic because it's easy to define something as taboo, or unaccepted? Lol, I have no clue, like I said guessing... could use a little guidance.
Quoting: MutantMessiah
See here [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] for some guidance.
41
Perhaps you made a map when you were younger. You may have said, "I will study hard so I can go to university and get a good job."
You created a logical map from one point to an other. So, you studied hard and did all the things you thought would get you to your destination.
Then, when you got a job after school you made an other map. "I will save up to buy a house." You did all the appropriate steps to make that happen.
The Genius works in a similar way. I could even show you how you have already used the Genius in the above examples.
The steps for the Genius however, are more of a direct way to communicate with the subconscious, it could be said, in order to map from one experience to an other.
For illustration only:
1) We create a unique physical symbol in order to slap your mind awake. The physicality of the symbol maps it to your physical experience.
2) We create rules around it (logic) in order to control the subconscious. The conscious mind loves to be in control, so this is the bridge between the two. It doesn't matter what the rules are because any logic will serve the purpose.
3) We give it possibility in order to exercise a kind of self trust with our subconscious processes. This is a balance for the rules, but still working with the parameters we have set. We are telling the subconscious mind, "You can do whatever you want with my symbol (but I am still in control)."
4) We allow our physical symbol to interact with our world. Don't be shy! My world does not bite. Subconscious elements take time to come out and play. This eases those elements into your world quicker and more assuredly.
(Note that I only use 'conscious' and 'subconscious' for illustration)
You created a logical map from one point to an other. So, you studied hard and did all the things you thought would get you to your destination.
Then, when you got a job after school you made an other map. "I will save up to buy a house." You did all the appropriate steps to make that happen.
The Genius works in a similar way. I could even show you how you have already used the Genius in the above examples.
The steps for the Genius however, are more of a direct way to communicate with the subconscious, it could be said, in order to map from one experience to an other.
For illustration only:
1) We create a unique physical symbol in order to slap your mind awake. The physicality of the symbol maps it to your physical experience.
2) We create rules around it (logic) in order to control the subconscious. The conscious mind loves to be in control, so this is the bridge between the two. It doesn't matter what the rules are because any logic will serve the purpose.
3) We give it possibility in order to exercise a kind of self trust with our subconscious processes. This is a balance for the rules, but still working with the parameters we have set. We are telling the subconscious mind, "You can do whatever you want with my symbol (but I am still in control)."
4) We allow our physical symbol to interact with our world. Don't be shy! My world does not bite. Subconscious elements take time to come out and play. This eases those elements into your world quicker and more assuredly.
(Note that I only use 'conscious' and 'subconscious' for illustration)
42
I suppose you'd like to know how it could be done.
Well, there are basically two ways of doing it.
1) Wait for scientists in your world to remember that physicality is an illusion of the senses and learn how to manipulate senses instead of matter (which is a kind of value of perception)
2) Take the back door and become physical from the dream world. How is this teleportation?
#2 is, in a way, the opposite of what you do when you sleep.
Your dream world and your waking world both have physical values.
The same way light has physical properties, dreams do also.
We can manipulate the 'frequency' of a dream in order to change the physical properties of it. We do this often and effortlessly (otherwise we would not wake up).
You may notice that some dreams are different than others.
Perhaps some of your dreams are lucid, some make you sweat in the real world, some are prophetic, others are just weird, etc.
Each dream can involve different kinds of physicality. (A part of your brain is also dreaming now as you read this, wouldn't you know.)
If, by teleportation, you mean to say physical transporting your body across vast distances instantaneously then it is certainly possible and something you already do when you sleep.
One physicality is 'replaced' with an other kind when you no longer perceive it. (Although you do perceive some elements of the other physicality in your new world, it is not the same.)
The way to do this when you're waking is to realize you're dreaming.
And perhaps the easiest way to realize you're dreaming is to pretend that you are dreaming while you are awake. This will bring the different kinds of physicality closer to your perception so that you can begin to manipulate them more. You feel this somewhat when you are tired and begin to hallucinate and perhaps hear sounds or see things. However, you can also do this when you're wide awake. (But it must become a part of your waking life, and not just for a few hours.)
It is easier to do this now than it was a few months ago.
As I have been talking about for a while, the dream world is merging with your world. This isn't just more crazy things happening (or feeling more like a dream). It means a new kind of physicality is at hand.
Well, there are basically two ways of doing it.
1) Wait for scientists in your world to remember that physicality is an illusion of the senses and learn how to manipulate senses instead of matter (which is a kind of value of perception)
2) Take the back door and become physical from the dream world. How is this teleportation?
#2 is, in a way, the opposite of what you do when you sleep.
Your dream world and your waking world both have physical values.
The same way light has physical properties, dreams do also.
We can manipulate the 'frequency' of a dream in order to change the physical properties of it. We do this often and effortlessly (otherwise we would not wake up).
You may notice that some dreams are different than others.
Perhaps some of your dreams are lucid, some make you sweat in the real world, some are prophetic, others are just weird, etc.
Each dream can involve different kinds of physicality. (A part of your brain is also dreaming now as you read this, wouldn't you know.)
If, by teleportation, you mean to say physical transporting your body across vast distances instantaneously then it is certainly possible and something you already do when you sleep.
One physicality is 'replaced' with an other kind when you no longer perceive it. (Although you do perceive some elements of the other physicality in your new world, it is not the same.)
The way to do this when you're waking is to realize you're dreaming.
And perhaps the easiest way to realize you're dreaming is to pretend that you are dreaming while you are awake. This will bring the different kinds of physicality closer to your perception so that you can begin to manipulate them more. You feel this somewhat when you are tired and begin to hallucinate and perhaps hear sounds or see things. However, you can also do this when you're wide awake. (But it must become a part of your waking life, and not just for a few hours.)
It is easier to do this now than it was a few months ago.
As I have been talking about for a while, the dream world is merging with your world. This isn't just more crazy things happening (or feeling more like a dream). It means a new kind of physicality is at hand.
43
Sometimes, the feeling is before the reality.
You may be feeling something that isn't really there.
But feeling is 'creates' it, and it makes it happen.
You may be feeling that way because you read this site :)
You may also be feeling that way because there is a change happening which you interpret to be something like you described.
Regardless, it is interesting, isn't it?
You may be feeling something that isn't really there.
But feeling is 'creates' it, and it makes it happen.
You may be feeling that way because you read this site :)
You may also be feeling that way because there is a change happening which you interpret to be something like you described.
Regardless, it is interesting, isn't it?
44
On one hand our perceptions are us, and they make up our world.
On the other hand they can really get on our nerves sometimes! Why must some of them exist?
When we encounter something that we do not want in our reality we have 2 choices.
1) Become attracted to it
2) Become repelled by it
Normally when we encounter something we don't like we consider it "not I" and are repelled by it. This actually further divides it and makes us experience itmore.
We "divide" in order to perceive. Without something to compare one thing with, what can we possibly know of an other?
So actually when we resist something (repulsion) we divide it, which makes us perceive it more.
The trick is to become attracted to what you don't like, in order to perceive it less.
What does it mean to be attracted to something? It does not mean loving it and bathing with it, or being glad that it is there.
It simply means understanding what it is to the point that you are not repelled by it (and do not want to push it away).
When you do this then you are realizing that it is you, and it is impossible to push yourself away.
I don't know if this part is a lesson or not (we are still debating that in my world) but it seems to make sense.
Why push your perceptions away when they are around you for a reason?
Make something else relevant and other things will fall off and disappear.
In other words, seek to understand what it is you don't like, get to a point where it doesn't bother you, then find its replacement.
That's how you change it.
On the other hand they can really get on our nerves sometimes! Why must some of them exist?
When we encounter something that we do not want in our reality we have 2 choices.
1) Become attracted to it
2) Become repelled by it
Normally when we encounter something we don't like we consider it "not I" and are repelled by it. This actually further divides it and makes us experience itmore.
We "divide" in order to perceive. Without something to compare one thing with, what can we possibly know of an other?
So actually when we resist something (repulsion) we divide it, which makes us perceive it more.
The trick is to become attracted to what you don't like, in order to perceive it less.
What does it mean to be attracted to something? It does not mean loving it and bathing with it, or being glad that it is there.
It simply means understanding what it is to the point that you are not repelled by it (and do not want to push it away).
When you do this then you are realizing that it is you, and it is impossible to push yourself away.
I don't know if this part is a lesson or not (we are still debating that in my world) but it seems to make sense.
Why push your perceptions away when they are around you for a reason?
Make something else relevant and other things will fall off and disappear.
In other words, seek to understand what it is you don't like, get to a point where it doesn't bother you, then find its replacement.
That's how you change it.
45
From the first post on this thread, I mentioned that the crop circle here: [link to www.cropcircleconnector.com] is a representation of the chronological events happen in this physicality.
It represents your transition into the dream world.
It has been there for all to see for a couple of months, since August 1 on this thread [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
For the past couple of years I have talked about our two worlds merging on www.ecsys.org and on this website.
That time is now, as I've mentioned.
The events you think are important in this world will be different in the world you are merging with. You expect "doom" where the doom you expect does not occur, but the doom you do not expect does.
I've mentioned time and time again, there is nothing to fear with this. (And yes, I mentioned that you will be disappointed on October 1 for those of you expecting people to die.)
(Yes, it's all a matter of perspective.)
I told you that my world was X and that Elenin was also my world, and the dream world. And that our Sun appears as Elenin.
How could this be?
Ecsys is about representations and Elenin, among other things, is a representation of the change occurring right now.
Elenin is very much alive and well, but not in the way you you would expect. There are many such representations. (It's interesting that most of you have forgotten about it since there was no giant earthquake during NASA's alignment.)
I mentioned that significant events would occur on certain days, and they did. Of course, it was not in the way most would like or would expect. Again, you are merging with the dream world so significant events hold a different kind of physicality than what you are used to.
I told you that Western society would begin to break down. A couple of weeks later and you can see it happening.
I told you months before September 29th that there would be a significant geological event that day, and there was. (El Hierro - I'm surprised no one got the 4th "Bond" reference of El Balneario de la Palma [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] )
(Either I'm right about what I'm explaining, or I'm stir crazy. Even the Zetas ran away when asked about 'Chaol'. Some of you are still on the sidelines until something even greater occurs. I'll be waiting.)
These are mentioned because they represent your physicality breaking up and being replaced with what I've been telling you about. (It is not 'doom' per se, but a new kind of physicality.)
The exact dates do not matter so much, but I present it to you so that you understand that there is no future, only what you call Now.
If "the future" is as you expect then what fun would that be? There would be nothing, because the present and future would be the same. Obviously, the future is not what you expect. It is entirely different.
The "events" I told you about before they happened have to do with the Sun. The Sun 'supports' your brand of physicality. It is the gatekeeper of your physical world.
On October 2, when most of you were disappointed there was no "doom" I asked you about the obvious event that did occur on October 1, as I predicted. "Where did the energy go?"
So I will ask you again on October 15, "Where did the energy go?" when a tremendous amount of energy is released from the Sun. (That is when you begin to enter the sphere, as in the crop circle representation.)
It is potential energy with a massive input. What is the output?
It is interacting with you, but how?
If the Sun is the gatekeeper of your brand of physicality and there are significant solar events happening right now, what do you think is really going on?
Could your physicality really be changing?
People look in the sky for things to happen, when the new physicality is totally different from what you're used to. You should not be looking at all. You should be thinking.
It represents your transition into the dream world.
It has been there for all to see for a couple of months, since August 1 on this thread [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
For the past couple of years I have talked about our two worlds merging on www.ecsys.org and on this website.
That time is now, as I've mentioned.
The events you think are important in this world will be different in the world you are merging with. You expect "doom" where the doom you expect does not occur, but the doom you do not expect does.
I've mentioned time and time again, there is nothing to fear with this. (And yes, I mentioned that you will be disappointed on October 1 for those of you expecting people to die.)
(Yes, it's all a matter of perspective.)
I told you that my world was X and that Elenin was also my world, and the dream world. And that our Sun appears as Elenin.
How could this be?
Ecsys is about representations and Elenin, among other things, is a representation of the change occurring right now.
Elenin is very much alive and well, but not in the way you you would expect. There are many such representations. (It's interesting that most of you have forgotten about it since there was no giant earthquake during NASA's alignment.)
I mentioned that significant events would occur on certain days, and they did. Of course, it was not in the way most would like or would expect. Again, you are merging with the dream world so significant events hold a different kind of physicality than what you are used to.
I told you that Western society would begin to break down. A couple of weeks later and you can see it happening.
I told you months before September 29th that there would be a significant geological event that day, and there was. (El Hierro - I'm surprised no one got the 4th "Bond" reference of El Balneario de la Palma [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] )
(Either I'm right about what I'm explaining, or I'm stir crazy. Even the Zetas ran away when asked about 'Chaol'. Some of you are still on the sidelines until something even greater occurs. I'll be waiting.)
These are mentioned because they represent your physicality breaking up and being replaced with what I've been telling you about. (It is not 'doom' per se, but a new kind of physicality.)
The exact dates do not matter so much, but I present it to you so that you understand that there is no future, only what you call Now.
If "the future" is as you expect then what fun would that be? There would be nothing, because the present and future would be the same. Obviously, the future is not what you expect. It is entirely different.
The "events" I told you about before they happened have to do with the Sun. The Sun 'supports' your brand of physicality. It is the gatekeeper of your physical world.
On October 2, when most of you were disappointed there was no "doom" I asked you about the obvious event that did occur on October 1, as I predicted. "Where did the energy go?"
So I will ask you again on October 15, "Where did the energy go?" when a tremendous amount of energy is released from the Sun. (That is when you begin to enter the sphere, as in the crop circle representation.)
It is potential energy with a massive input. What is the output?
It is interacting with you, but how?
If the Sun is the gatekeeper of your brand of physicality and there are significant solar events happening right now, what do you think is really going on?
Could your physicality really be changing?
People look in the sky for things to happen, when the new physicality is totally different from what you're used to. You should not be looking at all. You should be thinking.
46
Sometimes there are parts of our perspective that illustrate the more distant (less relative) of the "now" than others.
Sometimes these parts are illustrated as people, sometimes as animals or strange occurrences, events, etc.
This is not to say that we're gravitating towards them. But they are certainly there.
To a person 'with' that, their reality is logical and coherent. (Although of course there is only you.)
For your reality to be logical and coherent, all values within your reality must also be logical and coherent. (This includes things that you think are not.)
Sometimes these parts are illustrated as people, sometimes as animals or strange occurrences, events, etc.
This is not to say that we're gravitating towards them. But they are certainly there.
To a person 'with' that, their reality is logical and coherent. (Although of course there is only you.)
For your reality to be logical and coherent, all values within your reality must also be logical and coherent. (This includes things that you think are not.)
47
"potential energy with a massive input" would be high possibility.
You could make the output whatever you wanted it to be. But if it is in the same expression, the output would be neutral possibility, low possibility, high logic, neutral logic, or low logic.
However for this particular "potential energy with a massive input" it would be high logic because it IS the structure of physicality (of this perspective).
You are accurate in saying, <<...that would mean the input of energy changes the structure of our perspective, hence our "cognitive illusion" changes. perhaps into a higher state? if so, then the structure of the illusion becomes more relative to our perspective and we begin to "see through the illusion".>>
You figured it out!
Although this isn't really seeing through the illusion. You'd just be trading one illusion for an other. (Illusion is all there is.)
But it is a very nice illusion :)
From a physical perspective, you've already answered the question in the preceding paragraph. The energy goes to your perspective (e.g., a new value is introduced. And the 'event' is your way of making it logical to what you'd call your subconscious.)
You could make the output whatever you wanted it to be. But if it is in the same expression, the output would be neutral possibility, low possibility, high logic, neutral logic, or low logic.
However for this particular "potential energy with a massive input" it would be high logic because it IS the structure of physicality (of this perspective).
You are accurate in saying, <<...that would mean the input of energy changes the structure of our perspective, hence our "cognitive illusion" changes. perhaps into a higher state? if so, then the structure of the illusion becomes more relative to our perspective and we begin to "see through the illusion".>>
You figured it out!
Although this isn't really seeing through the illusion. You'd just be trading one illusion for an other. (Illusion is all there is.)
But it is a very nice illusion :)
From a physical perspective, you've already answered the question in the preceding paragraph. The energy goes to your perspective (e.g., a new value is introduced. And the 'event' is your way of making it logical to what you'd call your subconscious.)
48
All are values of your perspective, nothing outside.
It's not that something is changing, really. You're not 'evolving' per se.
You could say that when you're ready to experience something it is there all ready. So it seems like there is some sort of movement or progression where there is none.
The 'Sun' is doing everything. You experience that which is most logical for you to experience, all things considered. So in a way you choose what the sun is doing.
(Some call it 'co-creation' but it's just a logical progression, masqued as exploring your choice.)
It's not that something is changing, really. You're not 'evolving' per se.
You could say that when you're ready to experience something it is there all ready. So it seems like there is some sort of movement or progression where there is none.
The 'Sun' is doing everything. You experience that which is most logical for you to experience, all things considered. So in a way you choose what the sun is doing.
(Some call it 'co-creation' but it's just a logical progression, masqued as exploring your choice.)
49
When water flows through a channel, sometimes the swirls of currents bring aspects of the place we are leaving and may 'crowd' them around the new entrance.
It's good you're making them irrelevant to the new 'environment' but be careful not to resist them.
It may be enough to just say, "ok, you're right" or something similar. Or imagine yourself accepting them (even though it's unthinkable).
What this does is (bear with me) integrate these undesirable elements into your new reality but in a different form. "One octave up" you could say, which may completely change how you see them.
So, for example, thoughts of harming children may turn into something that appears to be totally unrelated but it actually the same geometry of relationships. So, it could be taking up botany or starting to sew sweaters.
The narrative you ascribe to the geometry of relationships is irrelevant to what it actually is.
It's good you're making them irrelevant to the new 'environment' but be careful not to resist them.
It may be enough to just say, "ok, you're right" or something similar. Or imagine yourself accepting them (even though it's unthinkable).
What this does is (bear with me) integrate these undesirable elements into your new reality but in a different form. "One octave up" you could say, which may completely change how you see them.
So, for example, thoughts of harming children may turn into something that appears to be totally unrelated but it actually the same geometry of relationships. So, it could be taking up botany or starting to sew sweaters.
The narrative you ascribe to the geometry of relationships is irrelevant to what it actually is.
50
The September 29 - October 28 cycle is nearly half complete.
A few months ago I mentioned that on September 29, "The Earth is shaken, not stirred. Like a bond."
After the fact most of us didn't get it, unfortunately. (How could we, when Chaol is being so mysterious? "WTF is a bond?" There was no earthquake that day!")
A "failed" prediction. Tsk, tsk. It wasn't a prediction. It is an observation. Some of us yet don't (want to) get it even after having spelled it out for you.
Do you wonder why the last significant earthquake was on September 18th? (A magnitude ~6.7)
I mentioned some weeks ago that it is much easier to 'whisper to volcanoes' than influence earthquakes.
What do you think flowing magma could symbolize and be a representation of on this Earth? Where is your magma?
Again from all of the significant events that occured on my "failed prediction dates" I ask, "Where do you think all that energy is going?"
(And, could I possibly know what I am talking about? Why would you want to experience what you expect when the unaccepted is more fun and future-worthy?)
No, this is not 'doom' as on your television. I told you there'd be no "doom" in your definition (but only the doom you expect on GLP, which is nothing happening).
Is October 15 significant? Yes.
Will anyone die on October 15? Probably not any more than usual. It's not the kind of event some of you are looking for. It'sfar more significant.
Tremendous energies will then be received (i.e., come more into your perspective) then.
Am I full of it? Definitely.
Is the Earth full of it, too? For sure!
(Surely, we'll have the same kind of conversation in a few days as from the start of this thread, where some of the not-get-its will say that I am hoaxing and have failed. I actually don't mind. It doesn't change a thing and it just makes certain realities that much more difficult to accept, which speeds the process along.)
Why do I mentioned these things? I want you to see that you are the Earth in a literal sense. No, I don't mean humanity as a whole. I mean you. (Yes, YOU!)
A few months ago I mentioned that on September 29, "The Earth is shaken, not stirred. Like a bond."
After the fact most of us didn't get it, unfortunately. (How could we, when Chaol is being so mysterious? "WTF is a bond?" There was no earthquake that day!")
A "failed" prediction. Tsk, tsk. It wasn't a prediction. It is an observation. Some of us yet don't (want to) get it even after having spelled it out for you.
Do you wonder why the last significant earthquake was on September 18th? (A magnitude ~6.7)
I mentioned some weeks ago that it is much easier to 'whisper to volcanoes' than influence earthquakes.
What do you think flowing magma could symbolize and be a representation of on this Earth? Where is your magma?
Again from all of the significant events that occured on my "failed prediction dates" I ask, "Where do you think all that energy is going?"
(And, could I possibly know what I am talking about? Why would you want to experience what you expect when the unaccepted is more fun and future-worthy?)
No, this is not 'doom' as on your television. I told you there'd be no "doom" in your definition (but only the doom you expect on GLP, which is nothing happening).
Is October 15 significant? Yes.
Will anyone die on October 15? Probably not any more than usual. It's not the kind of event some of you are looking for. It'sfar more significant.
Tremendous energies will then be received (i.e., come more into your perspective) then.
Am I full of it? Definitely.
Is the Earth full of it, too? For sure!
(Surely, we'll have the same kind of conversation in a few days as from the start of this thread, where some of the not-get-its will say that I am hoaxing and have failed. I actually don't mind. It doesn't change a thing and it just makes certain realities that much more difficult to accept, which speeds the process along.)
Why do I mentioned these things? I want you to see that you are the Earth in a literal sense. No, I don't mean humanity as a whole. I mean you. (Yes, YOU!)
51
"Absolutely nothing" is existence itself.
The moment we attach a value to that which has no value and cannot be perceived (nothing) is the moment of creation.
(Although Ecsys holds that nothing is created, only perceived.)
Imagine yourself standing next to a void with no depth or dimension. No sound escapes from it and no light escapes from it.
The moment you think about it is the moment when it exists. Of course, it could not really exist. But the act of thinking of something that has no value is so powerful it creates perspective.
So, in a way, perspective comes from trying to perceive of nothing.
It is like "nothing" burped and the burp was the most important thing ever because the act meant that something else had to exist. Whereafter it perceived itself burping, and thus all was born.
A little different than this of course, but as much as can be expressed in these words.
The moment we attach a value to that which has no value and cannot be perceived (nothing) is the moment of creation.
(Although Ecsys holds that nothing is created, only perceived.)
Imagine yourself standing next to a void with no depth or dimension. No sound escapes from it and no light escapes from it.
The moment you think about it is the moment when it exists. Of course, it could not really exist. But the act of thinking of something that has no value is so powerful it creates perspective.
So, in a way, perspective comes from trying to perceive of nothing.
It is like "nothing" burped and the burp was the most important thing ever because the act meant that something else had to exist. Whereafter it perceived itself burping, and thus all was born.
A little different than this of course, but as much as can be expressed in these words.
52
And they're not faults dancing around. That activity is quiet now and has been for a while: [link to www.irf.se]
It's magma from the September 29th occurence from earlier in this thread.
(As I mentioned about 4 months ago, September 29 is when "The Earth is shaken, not stirred. Like a Bond."
1st meaning: The UK's former meridian is El Hierro, a volcano that began to become much more active on September 29: [link to www.01.ign.es] James Bond, of course, is British.
2nd meaning: Immense pressure, like a bond, is not only building up tremendously but has "shaken loose" an important layer in the Earth's mantle in that region on that day (see chart above)
3rd meaning: This bond stretches all around the Earth, of course, so it is telling us that pressure in the mantle is at extreme levels and magma is continuing to build up at a rapid pace.
4th meaning: "El Balneario de la Palma". La Palma (in the Canary Islands) is next to El Hierro. It is also the name of the hotel in Cuba where James Bond's character stayed. El Hierro is the canary in the coal mine. Will there be a Cuba because of El Hierro? Who knows!
(Isn't language fun?)
See here:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
From meaning #3, what does it mean that this bond stretches all around the Earth? Magma is building up at a tremendous pace all around the Earth,like one force.
There is nothing "bad" that is going to happen. As I mentioned before your physicality is changing. These physical changes that you see are because of this change.
And, for some of you guys out there who have mostly already left this thread for lack of sufficient "doom"... The good guys always have the last laugh :)
It's magma from the September 29th occurence from earlier in this thread.
(As I mentioned about 4 months ago, September 29 is when "The Earth is shaken, not stirred. Like a Bond."
1st meaning: The UK's former meridian is El Hierro, a volcano that began to become much more active on September 29: [link to www.01.ign.es] James Bond, of course, is British.
2nd meaning: Immense pressure, like a bond, is not only building up tremendously but has "shaken loose" an important layer in the Earth's mantle in that region on that day (see chart above)
3rd meaning: This bond stretches all around the Earth, of course, so it is telling us that pressure in the mantle is at extreme levels and magma is continuing to build up at a rapid pace.
4th meaning: "El Balneario de la Palma". La Palma (in the Canary Islands) is next to El Hierro. It is also the name of the hotel in Cuba where James Bond's character stayed. El Hierro is the canary in the coal mine. Will there be a Cuba because of El Hierro? Who knows!
(Isn't language fun?)
See here:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
From meaning #3, what does it mean that this bond stretches all around the Earth? Magma is building up at a tremendous pace all around the Earth,like one force.
There is nothing "bad" that is going to happen. As I mentioned before your physicality is changing. These physical changes that you see are because of this change.
And, for some of you guys out there who have mostly already left this thread for lack of sufficient "doom"... The good guys always have the last laugh :)
53
Imagine that when you resist something you are pushing it away. And when you push it away there is an energy transfer not only from you to it but also from it to you.
Continue to imagine that when you push there is repulsion.However, when it is being pushed by you there is attraction.
When you make something irrelevant to your reality there is no need to push or repel. No need to even think about it. It simply becomes something else.
The more you think about it the more logical it becomes to your reality because you are, in a way, reforming your entire perspective in order to think about it.
So actually when you say you don't want something and you actively work to resist it you are creating more of it in your experience. It may not be it directly (but it probably will be) but it will surely be it's geometry of relationships.
So sometimes you 'resist' and then it seems to disappear. But keep in mind that your experience is like [link to ecsys.org] . So you cannot resist the geometry of relationships without also attracting it.
By 'not resisting' I don't mean to give in to whatever happens. I mean to make something irrelevant and illogical to your experience.
When thinking about how to make something irrelevant to your experience you can think first, "How is this possible?" when thinking about the experience/perception you don't want.
Continue to imagine that when you push there is repulsion.However, when it is being pushed by you there is attraction.
When you make something irrelevant to your reality there is no need to push or repel. No need to even think about it. It simply becomes something else.
The more you think about it the more logical it becomes to your reality because you are, in a way, reforming your entire perspective in order to think about it.
So actually when you say you don't want something and you actively work to resist it you are creating more of it in your experience. It may not be it directly (but it probably will be) but it will surely be it's geometry of relationships.
So sometimes you 'resist' and then it seems to disappear. But keep in mind that your experience is like [link to ecsys.org] . So you cannot resist the geometry of relationships without also attracting it.
By 'not resisting' I don't mean to give in to whatever happens. I mean to make something irrelevant and illogical to your experience.
When thinking about how to make something irrelevant to your experience you can think first, "How is this possible?" when thinking about the experience/perception you don't want.
54
Fear is definitely real. It is not just an illusion (no more than anything else, at least).
If it were not real, it would not be perceived or felt.
But some of the confusion comes when we think about 'how real is my fear'?
That you get rid of some aspects of your reality may not get rid of the fear. The aspect that you think facilitates the fear may not be related to the fear.
So for example you could say that you have a fear of being mugged and moving out of a dangerous neighborhood would help to get rid of the fear.
Well, it could have been the fear that caused you to make living in that neighborhood more relative to your experience.
But it may have been there even before you moved there.
Explore the concept of "mugging" to understand the geometry of the relationships better. What do you imagine it to mean? What do the persons look like? How do they smell? Do they smile to you? Is there some part of you that will give up or be more passive? What is the weather like? What did you do earlier that day in your imagination, before you were mugged? Is there milk in the fridge?
What does it feel like to have something you truly cherish taken away?
(This is not to discuss your fear, of course. I am just using a non-related example out of respect for your privacy.)
To see what "mugging" is, explore around it. The secret is that "mugging" does not really exist. It only exist when it is perceived in relation to other things. Usually, the concepts around your perception.
In this way you can seek to make your fears irrelevant.
If it were not real, it would not be perceived or felt.
But some of the confusion comes when we think about 'how real is my fear'?
That you get rid of some aspects of your reality may not get rid of the fear. The aspect that you think facilitates the fear may not be related to the fear.
So for example you could say that you have a fear of being mugged and moving out of a dangerous neighborhood would help to get rid of the fear.
Well, it could have been the fear that caused you to make living in that neighborhood more relative to your experience.
But it may have been there even before you moved there.
Explore the concept of "mugging" to understand the geometry of the relationships better. What do you imagine it to mean? What do the persons look like? How do they smell? Do they smile to you? Is there some part of you that will give up or be more passive? What is the weather like? What did you do earlier that day in your imagination, before you were mugged? Is there milk in the fridge?
What does it feel like to have something you truly cherish taken away?
(This is not to discuss your fear, of course. I am just using a non-related example out of respect for your privacy.)
To see what "mugging" is, explore around it. The secret is that "mugging" does not really exist. It only exist when it is perceived in relation to other things. Usually, the concepts around your perception.
In this way you can seek to make your fears irrelevant.
55
Greetings all.
I am here. My apologies for not having much time to respond lately. I've been quite busy working on a project.
It is interesting to 'observe' what some (many) here care to write as though they have learned nothing the past two years of reading what I write.
Do we really think such things would happen in a way we expect, in every direction?
Yes. You have transitioned to the dream world. But do you have any idea what that means?
Some of you see it readily, some of you don't. (Some parts of your perspective are 'there' and some are still stuck 'over there'.) Some of you won't leave from over there and will never 'get there'.
The evidence is all around you. Yet of course some of you ignore it easily.
Understanding requires patience.
Nothing has changed about the period of September 29 - October 28. I don't make predictions about the future. I illustrate observations in a way that benefits my purpose of introducing you to your new reality.
Throwing fits reminds me of Karate Kid.
Some of you speak as though you are already masters, and can dictate exactly how something happens.
It happens.. but why would it happen in the way that you think it would?
If something is obvious to you, why would it be obvious to all of you? (All of who you are, at this moment?)
At this point.. there's not much I can say that I haven't already said.
Some of you feel it. Some of you don't. Think what you will.
(By the way.. I have not stopped playing chess-not-checkers)
If you don't believe that any of this is likely then we shall not meet.
Ask yourself 2 questions:
1) Do you understand how the universe works?
2) Could your current understanding be 100% inaccurate?
What would it mean to notunderstand how things work? Could it mean that your assumptions, even that which you think has to be true, could be entirely "wrong"?
You ignore what feels right (or is right) with Chaol and focus, instead, on your assumptions about reality that do not match with what I illustrate.
Imagine, for a moment, that you knew and understood the truth about everything that ever was/is/will be.
How distant do you think your current thinking would be from it?
Do you think there is anything within that distance, like a universe of misplaced assumptions? Is it possible that that distance exists now?
Half of you are upset that no "doom" has occurred a couple of hours into October 28. (Even when I did not tell you what would happen.)
Half of the remainder are disappointed that you don't "feel anything different".
When you are sick, do you feel it immediately? Most of the time you are sick, you've already been sick for 3-4 days. What does this tell you about your own awareness of what is going on around you (and even inside of you)?
Of this, I can do nothing but 'observe'.
I already see you for you.
Do you see me?
I am here. My apologies for not having much time to respond lately. I've been quite busy working on a project.
It is interesting to 'observe' what some (many) here care to write as though they have learned nothing the past two years of reading what I write.
Do we really think such things would happen in a way we expect, in every direction?
Yes. You have transitioned to the dream world. But do you have any idea what that means?
Some of you see it readily, some of you don't. (Some parts of your perspective are 'there' and some are still stuck 'over there'.) Some of you won't leave from over there and will never 'get there'.
The evidence is all around you. Yet of course some of you ignore it easily.
Understanding requires patience.
Nothing has changed about the period of September 29 - October 28. I don't make predictions about the future. I illustrate observations in a way that benefits my purpose of introducing you to your new reality.
Throwing fits reminds me of Karate Kid.
Some of you speak as though you are already masters, and can dictate exactly how something happens.
It happens.. but why would it happen in the way that you think it would?
If something is obvious to you, why would it be obvious to all of you? (All of who you are, at this moment?)
At this point.. there's not much I can say that I haven't already said.
Some of you feel it. Some of you don't. Think what you will.
(By the way.. I have not stopped playing chess-not-checkers)
If you don't believe that any of this is likely then we shall not meet.
Ask yourself 2 questions:
1) Do you understand how the universe works?
2) Could your current understanding be 100% inaccurate?
What would it mean to notunderstand how things work? Could it mean that your assumptions, even that which you think has to be true, could be entirely "wrong"?
You ignore what feels right (or is right) with Chaol and focus, instead, on your assumptions about reality that do not match with what I illustrate.
Imagine, for a moment, that you knew and understood the truth about everything that ever was/is/will be.
How distant do you think your current thinking would be from it?
Do you think there is anything within that distance, like a universe of misplaced assumptions? Is it possible that that distance exists now?
Half of you are upset that no "doom" has occurred a couple of hours into October 28. (Even when I did not tell you what would happen.)
Half of the remainder are disappointed that you don't "feel anything different".
When you are sick, do you feel it immediately? Most of the time you are sick, you've already been sick for 3-4 days. What does this tell you about your own awareness of what is going on around you (and even inside of you)?
Of this, I can do nothing but 'observe'.
I already see you for you.
Do you see me?
56
As I mention throughout this thread, El Hierro will be the first to express its new physicality.
This volcano in the Canary Islands is the "canary in the coal mine" and will begin a chain of reactions that will see ~400 volcanoes erupt.
This pressure within the Earth is in a way caused by the Sun. The Sun is changing the Earth's physicality and, along with it, providing the impetus for human social, emotional, psychological, and physical mutations.
These energies, along with the radiation from Fukushima, usher in a new type of humanity.
This volcano in the Canary Islands is the "canary in the coal mine" and will begin a chain of reactions that will see ~400 volcanoes erupt.
This pressure within the Earth is in a way caused by the Sun. The Sun is changing the Earth's physicality and, along with it, providing the impetus for human social, emotional, psychological, and physical mutations.
These energies, along with the radiation from Fukushima, usher in a new type of humanity.
57
As I mentioned before, the ground under your feet is becoming unstable.
There is a tremendous buildup of magma around much of the world.
Nearly 1 year ago an important layer in the mantle was shaken loose. The 'bond' stretches pretty much all around the globe, so there is probably be more destablization coming your way shortly.
It's going to get a bit hot in some places. Should make for a nice winter.
All the while, El Hierro continues to build up energy.
There is a tremendous buildup of magma around much of the world.
Nearly 1 year ago an important layer in the mantle was shaken loose. The 'bond' stretches pretty much all around the globe, so there is probably be more destablization coming your way shortly.
It's going to get a bit hot in some places. Should make for a nice winter.
All the while, El Hierro continues to build up energy.
58
Of course there is all ways a choice.
But given a choice between a world where terribly exciting things are happening and a world that is subsumed in peaceful experience, what do you think most of 'us' will choose? Which is most logical for us to now experience?
In the former world we have an endless variety of relationships with which to interact. So many, indeed, that we don't know what some of them are. With so many varieties one can almost guarantee that you'll be able to utilize the least amount of energy jumping from relationship to relationship for some time to come (no matter what it seems like on the outside).
In the latter (peaceful) world we have less possibilities for interaction (and thus, the potential for more energy to be used). Not a choice that would normally be made.
Nethermind the details of the interactions. It's all about relationships.
Let's get ready to rumb... oh, no. I can't use that phrase. It's trademarked!
Are you not entertained?
But given a choice between a world where terribly exciting things are happening and a world that is subsumed in peaceful experience, what do you think most of 'us' will choose? Which is most logical for us to now experience?
In the former world we have an endless variety of relationships with which to interact. So many, indeed, that we don't know what some of them are. With so many varieties one can almost guarantee that you'll be able to utilize the least amount of energy jumping from relationship to relationship for some time to come (no matter what it seems like on the outside).
In the latter (peaceful) world we have less possibilities for interaction (and thus, the potential for more energy to be used). Not a choice that would normally be made.
Nethermind the details of the interactions. It's all about relationships.
Let's get ready to rumb... oh, no. I can't use that phrase. It's trademarked!
Are you not entertained?
59
There are a couple of physically-oriented events in the realm of distinct possibility, right around the corner.
Most likely during the next nexus point of October 17 & 18, 19.
Usually nexus points last less than a couple of hours. (The September 9, 2001 nexus point lasted for a full day, for example.) This one is 3 days. I'm not sure what it means but it's probably something either very significant or just lazy to be expressed.
A nexus point is like a burst of potential energy. (A sustained nexus almost all ways has physically-oriented properties. New York, for example, is built around such a point.)
Anything could happen :)
Most likely during the next nexus point of October 17 & 18, 19.
Usually nexus points last less than a couple of hours. (The September 9, 2001 nexus point lasted for a full day, for example.) This one is 3 days. I'm not sure what it means but it's probably something either very significant or just lazy to be expressed.
A nexus point is like a burst of potential energy. (A sustained nexus almost all ways has physically-oriented properties. New York, for example, is built around such a point.)
Anything could happen :)
60
Most of us have consciously decided to increase the potential energy of a nexus point. Notably, it is something I advised against. Not only do we live for human drama, we needit in order to survive.
Subconsciously we look for relationships we can interact with. The more relationships the better. It does not matter what the relationship is, actually. Only that we have the potential to interact with something.
We see a crowd gather and we want to know what's going on.
We see a big tsunami and we want to get closer.
Uncle Tom passes his daily humours and we are eager to smell it.
We know something bad will happen but we are secretly very curious as to its possibility.
Given the chance to diminish such a powerful energy where "anything could happen" we rarely would take it.
Who would pass up an opportunity for such possibilities, no matter what actually happens?
Subconsciously we look for relationships we can interact with. The more relationships the better. It does not matter what the relationship is, actually. Only that we have the potential to interact with something.
We see a crowd gather and we want to know what's going on.
We see a big tsunami and we want to get closer.
Uncle Tom passes his daily humours and we are eager to smell it.
We know something bad will happen but we are secretly very curious as to its possibility.
Given the chance to diminish such a powerful energy where "anything could happen" we rarely would take it.
Who would pass up an opportunity for such possibilities, no matter what actually happens?