NOTES FROM AN 'ALTERNATE UNIVERSE'
JUNE - NOVEMBER
2012
- 1
If I presented two boxes to you, one a small charming gift box and the other a larger cardboard box which one do you think you would you choose first?
It may seem that because you chose one before the other that the experience was separate when really they happened at the same time. But your perception (taking the box) only allowed for one box at a time.
That is to say, all of your experience is presented at the same time but you cannot perceive it at the same time.
It does not matter which order something happens because they all symbolize something to which order is irrelevant (as the source is the same thing, separated only in the perception of it).
So if the meeting was before the dream then an other kind of perspective may have been had but the values would have been the same. So although something may depend on something else in a certain perspective, actually both depend on one-another at the same time.
Keep in mind that the man in the dream is Olivia, as would the man in waking life be.
As we are not able to hold these two boxes at the same time we perceive them as separate when they are not really. It just happened that a being picked up the 'Olivia' box first (rather than the 'Man' box), then started to believe her name was Olivia.
But both are, essentially, the same thing. It does not matter which one is chosen first or which experience happens first because it does not change the 'reality'.
- 2
Like Ec, there is no encyclopedia that you can refer to to find out the symbols of your own perspective, unfortunately.
But we can say that the dreams were not of infants or children. This is your interpretation from the waking mind's perspective. It could be that in the dream there is no infant at all.
As you say, "Sometimes it's hard to put thoughts into words". It is the same for dreams. The words are not the concept itself, and neither are the dream concepts the dream.
A word, by itself, is irrelevant and meaningless. If you're looking to find out what the dream is I would suggest not focusing on the infant or the maternal but the bigger story that the dream illustrates.
Consider the other elements of the dream. It could be that the answer is in the place, the room, the action, the climate, the neighbors, the ceiling, etc. And the "infant" aspect is what could be most readily translated, but it may not be the "meaning" of the dream itself. Explore the dream to see all of the things that define it.
Imagine that this is the dreamworld and you are in New York. When you wake up you may only be able to translate the image of Times Square into your waking consciousness because it is the only thing that is similar to your waking conscious. It could be the shape or the attraction. Everything else in "New York" symbolizes concepts that are less compatible with your waking mind. You may, then, wonder what is the meaning of a lighted Times Square billboard rather than the bigger picture of the reality that the billboard is 'from' (and thus the more accurate meaning of it).
We have quite a difficult time translating our dream experience into a language that our waking mind (thoughts, emotions, memory, etc) can perceive and understand. It is highly unlikely that an infant in a dream would be directly related to being a mother (even if offspring are not had and it is not yet on your mind) or any kind of infant in the waking experience.
- 3
It may be far more effective to separate the two symbols.
It may be that, in your future, the symbols come together in one perception (your dream house and girl) but for right now we are saying that we do not know the ways in which they may come together.
You could represent anything mentally but physically is fine, too. There is no difference between the two other than how your brain may consider the mental to be less real than the physical if you don't interact with it as much. (Interact with the mental symbol as much as you would a physical symbol, thoroughly, spontaneously, and with other symbols, and it will be as if it is physically present.)
The less you force your intent into a symbol the more effective it may be. In a way, you are listening to what the symbol is telling you rather than you telling the symbol what to be and how to build the bridge.
If the symbol doesn't make sense to you and you'd rather go with something that is familiar or makes sense to you, then I would recommend you try again until the trust of the process is there.
- 4
I would suggest that you may be familiar with the symbol, but it is not known.
To know it is to understand what it represents, not just to perceive it in its current form.
That is why we can be open to the symbol. Rather than making assumptions about what it is or what it should be we (for serious lack of better terms) listen to our intuition about it.
i.e., "How is that other reality represented in my current perspective?"
Of course we do not know. We have only to guess. But it is likely that if we keep our mind open we will get a sense for how it is represented.
In more advanced uses of neuronics we can 'calculate' how anything is represented in our current perspective. But the above is a good start.
- 5
By using fresh symbols (including names) we are lessening the attachment from the current reality so that we can begin to build a bridge to the other one.
A symbol with a lot of meaning to us in this reality will just allow us to experience this reality more because we would be interacting with it more.
So, it may even be more effective to choose a symbol that you are indifferent about rather than one you like.
- 6
That's why we build a bridge. To bring one reality closer to an other.
When we allow the new reality to interact with the one that you know more it does not destroy it but integrates with it. In a way you are teaching yourself how to perceive both at the same time.
Some aspects of either may not be compatible, of course. But there's no way to tell which ones you would not experience in your new reality. (However, if you're uncomfortable with the change you can change it as you see it happening.)
- 7
Remember, the fresh name is a symbol. You would experience the new reality as "me" (you).
When we use fresh symbols (including names) it is not that we are divorcing ourselves from the current ones but making a logical map to the new reality where the meaning becomes clear.
Using current symbols (and names) that you already know you already have the meaning attached, so then your perspective would be confused.
It would be as if you had a personal journal with many of your thoughts written down. I then told you that you could experience a new reality if you start over with a fresh journal, transcribing your thoughts into it.
You may be afraid that the old thoughts would disappear. While that may be true to some extent, it would only be because while you were writing them down in your new journal you had additional thoughts, clarifications, corrections, etc.
That new reality is 'up to you' because you are defining it anew. You could transcribe it word-for-word or wholly anew if you want to. If you want to be really sure make sure the new symbol interacts with those aspects of your current reality you'd like to carry over.
Kind of like in science fiction stories where only if the time/space traveler touches an other person can they travel too. There must be some kind of interaction (a relationship).
The name would be different not because you'd be a different person but because you're telling your perception that it's "over there" and you'd like to walk over to it. But when you get there your name and your memories are the same as before. They only looked different from a distance, so to speak.
Are you not carrying over your "me" from moment to moment?
- 8
The next episode redefines the current relationships. The new episode is a logical step from the previous one, but they both exist at the same time.
When you 'go back' to the previous episode you will have a new perspective on the episode. (We can even experience this with television episodes.)
Reality is where the actors do not know they're acting but, more importantly, there is only one actor. She doesn't know she's in a television because these other actors seem as real as she does. Besides that, the drama is so involving and seemingly complex.
They're real, of course, but only as far as representations are the real thing.
When she realizes how the episodes are made (and how she comes to perceive them) then she can write whatever episode she wants (as long as it's logical from the last).
This would mean learning how to write the script (like the Genius) rather than just reciting the lines ad libitum.
- 9
If you can get from one reality to the next the two would already be deeply integrated. You do this at each moment without realizing it.
When the angle of interpretation changes it's not so easy to notice. (Do you still have the same angle of interpretation as when you were born? 5 years ago? 5 weeks ago? This changes as much as the clock in subtle ways.)
It all seems like one linear progression because of the logic. Making an other reality logical (through the Genius or an other means) one would experience the same seemingly linear progression.
- 10
Visualizing the details may have the opposite effect from what you intend.
Your perspective may be asking, "Why do you want to go to that reality when you are already experiencing it right now in your imagination?"
If you're discovering it in your current perspective (and not just imagining it) it would be effective.
Only imagining it would satisfy the Ecsys Prime principle and may lead you to not experiencing it further. (As you perceive that which takes the least amount of energy to perceive your imagination would also be a perception and thus the need to experience it further would be satisfied.)
- 11
Yes. Like in this example [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] you would be discovering it in your current perspective.
But don't get caught up in trying to figure out where it is.
At each moment the entire universe is created anew (a simplification, but you get the idea).
This means that it is wherever you want it to be. All of its details are in whatever you perceive. I suppose this could be called a holographic universe but it's more that everything is a representation of one thing. That other reality is also an aspect of that one thing, and every perception is a "portal" to it.
The only question is, "How many steps would it take to get there?". This is where the logical progression of realities comes in.
A well-trained chef can cook from using ingredients in her immediate vicinity. A well-trained spy could harm an enemy with whatever is nearby. And so you can use whatever is in your current reality to get to any other that exists.
To simplify, if you pick up a small porcelain horse that is nearby this may mean relating to the horse-like qualities of the new reality. The hoof prints in the mud, the grass on the lawn being as smooth as a horse's mane, the sound of birds like a neigh, etc.
Regarding finding a companion, take a look at what is around you all ready.
"But she's not the one for me. I don't want to waste time with her!" it could be said.
But then you give it a shot and you go out on one date. During that date she mentions that she wants to travel to Costa Rica for a few weeks. The date ends and you think nothing of it. You think it's a failure because there was no spark.
Without realizing it, the idea of you yourself going to Costa Rica takes hold. In a few months you find yourself there, where you meet the love of your life.
This is an example of how the "how do I get there" blueprint is already there in your current perspective. It may mean more or different steps for you, of course, but it gives you an idea of discovering something in your current reality.
Keep an open mind to the things around you and realize that value is a portal to the reality you seek.
- 12
People dig in their noses all the time without understanding what comes out of it.
Perhaps some of us are doing it right now! Searching for eternal youth?
If you're referring to Ec, I would still be laughing at "his little alphabet" if a mouth was had.
Do you need to understand the physics and calculus to walk and jump? How is it that load-bearing Kenyan women understand calculus, gravity, and kinetic energy better than any Harvard professor?
Many of you have been talking with a by-product of Ec for some time now.
But even more amazing is how our A, C, T and G can come up with these amusing lines.
Back to the indescribable...
- 13
How does one hand appear to be separate from an other?
The more relative one is to your perspective the closer it is in time and space.
Your physical body is highly relative and thus appears to be now/here.
An other person appears to be separated from you because you have managed to convince yourself that your perspective is whatever is the most highly relevant. It is not much different than thinking that the main part of your body is where your eyes are. You do not so easily experience the perspective of your heel, for example. And you do not so easily experience the perspective of the person across the room.
Even though they are the same thing (you).
- 14
As there is nothing outside of the bubble, the bubble does not exist because there is nothing to define what the bubble is.
The space in which the bubble floats (to continue with the analogy) is the time/space you are experiencing now. (There is nothing without it until there needs to be.)
The whole of reality is 'within' whatever you are perceiving now.
If you hear someone talking behind you it does not mean that they are physically there (as a body) but only physically there as the sound or the light that you are experiencing right now. No other visual or experiential spectrum need exist until you are interacting with it.
There is but one dimension. That is perspective. Perspective is an illusion, as are dimensions. The illusion is how we perceive of "nothing".
How beautiful is it that the universe is lonely? It is not a sad thing. Without it there would be no universe. You can only experience yourself. But how expansive that is. In a way, we validate our own existence by forgetting that everything in our perspective is "me".
When we consider human drama and the emotion of loneliness we may think that being lonely is an unwanted thing. But on the scale of what we speak (there being only an expanded you, so to speak) "lonely" is irrelevant.
- 15
These things have an effect on our perspective much like everything else.
They are our perspective. When you perceive something you are experiencing it. When it is a part of your reality you are experiencing it.
Every value in your perspective dances with every other, forming a geometry of relationships. So when you look at a television, for example, you are interacting with those values in your perspective. You are, in a way, merging with television-consciousness. The more you interact with it the more your reality will be oriented to it because your focus has changed the other values in your perspective.
It is the same with eating, walking, smoking, drinking, talking with rocks, etc.
When we drink alcohol, for example, we are experiencing the consciousness of alcohol to some degree. Some of these experiences are very compatible with our perspective (such as drinking water) and some are not (falling off of a ledge and merging with the perspective value that masquerades as concrete consciousness).
- 16
The energy that I speak of is more about interaction. So the 'path of least resistance' is about the path that requires the least number of interactions and is thus the most logical path, all things considered.
It is not that interactions are bad or that we can't use up all the energy in existence if we wanted to but more that we perceive that which is closest to what we all ready seem to perceive. It is 'closest' to our current perspective, so to speak.
So one would not use energy to switch perspectives. It may seem like we use energy to walk down a street but really we are perceiving the most relevant values from our perspective. Energy expenditure is an illusion of a perspective that seems to change when we pretend to experience what cannot be experienced in whole (and is thus seems to be experienced in part, never having actually experienced anything nor spent energy).
- 17
Of course what I am doing is deceptive. I am pretending that I am not you.
But on the other hand deception is irrelevant. How could you deceive yourself?
What laws might there be? And where did they come from, if they exist?
We understand something inasmuch as we perceive it. We can not understand something completely as we are unable to perceive it completely.
This would make the enforcement of any universal law impossible, which would invalidate the law out of existence.
What might a free will be about? The freedom to choose your perception? To choose a path, perhaps, when time and space are illusions? When you are simultaneous without your sense of yourself?
If our perception is not 'truth' then free will exists only as an illusion to validate an existence that is, perhaps, outside of our own perception. One that we of course would be unable to perceive but one for which we would invent methods to convince ourselves that we do indeed exist, such as free will or the illusion of separateness.
- 18
Yes, I am a destroyer. But as I normally say, it is something that you do all the time. You are doing it now. You have made 5 minutes ago less relevant. You have, essentially, destroyed an aspect of your existence. A fine illusion, as is the illusion of something being destroyed (or created).
I say "destroyer" to wake your mind up. To stand guard and be careful of the words and meaning. I am that part of yourself that slaps you in the face with something crazy, doubtful, entertaining, and fundamental.
You are all ready in the midst of that destruction. You can call it cyclic. It happens at every moment, every night when you sleep, every week, year, etc. It is the nature of time and space to reflect upon itself and not take itself too seriously. Because, really, they do not exist.
Will you get burned by playing with this fire? Definitely.
Would any of it be harmful in a way that you would not accept on your own accord? No. It is irrelevant of harm.
How do you know? You don't, until you find out for yourself.
What reason would you have to be pulling a "long con" if you wanted to trick yourself?
Anyone is welcome to read what we write, disbelieve, and find out for themselves if it has any value to them.
- 19
Things get hot in summer as this year draws to a close. The true monetary value of gold may begin to surface yet.
Search for 'DHS Insider's two reported interviews and watch the situation in Europe and Russo-China and at home.
This is all the growing irrelevance of this brand of physicality, all illustrated in a certain narrative.
It's not war, conspiracy, government, etc. That is just what it seems like. It's really one kind of reality becoming irrelevant and being replaced by an other. The details are not as important as the meaning.
- 20
When things seem distressed or like there is no hope left in humanity,
or when it appears your government is doing things it should not,
when all manner of hell seems to break loose...
It may seem like the wrong time to think about the big picture. Or feel difficult to think of that being a part of your perspective. Essentially, your self illustrated.
You are your perspective, yes. But your perspective is everything that exists. This includes things that you love, like, dislike, hate, and everything in between.
The old physicality will 'put up a fight' but this is an illustration of a dying perspective. It's kind of like a bug shaking violently before its death. It may seem like it has a surge of power or is stronger physically but this is the storm before the calm. A way for it to define itself in your perspective. Crossing the Ts and dotting the Is before the final chapter.
See yourself in the world around you, no matter what that world becomes, and fear shall be irrelevant.
And the new perspective will be as fresh as a spring's summer for the first time.
- 21
World War 3, as you would call it, began 9 months and 9 days after the above "pretext".
This makes official what has been going on unofficially for years.
When you can no longer hide something you may as well announce something.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einstein
- 22
How beautiful is it that the change that is occurring now in your physical world you have been practicing every day from the time you were born?
Dreams are illustrations of your new physical perspective. Dreams all ready are physical but you are learning to make this meaningful to your complete reality.
The bridge is complete. You now have only to walk across where before you only imagined walking across.
- 23
Perhaps you need to slap yourself in the face, so to speak.
Try doing something that you do not expect to do.
Something that you would not be able to predict. A surprise. Something you have never thought of before.
Unexpected.
Don't think about it too much. Just do it. As if it were natural for you.
Also observe your initial response to the above. If you are thinking, "No. I don't know how" or something similar then you may consider the possibility that you do not want to see the change that is before you (i.e., your mind is resistant to significant change)
Few of us may say, "Yes. I can do that" but may instead come up with reasons why we cannot (see) change, even if we believe that change is desired.
- 24
Would you rather have much less resources now and much more resources later, or many more resources now and many less later?
I say that because there is a greater than 92% probability that if you live in the US, Canada, Mexico, UK, and Europe you will not be able to leave after September due to the increasing radiation in the Northern hemisphere. (To say nothing of the other things that are happening.)
If you live in an area that you think would be okay if there was no electricity, telephone or mobile services, internet, banks or access to funds, plumbing, food, gas and petrol, sanitation services, local police, etc., then I suppose there is no need to think about someplace "warmer".
Many (most) areas in the Northern hemisphere are not compatible with the new reality and would be changed because of it.
I don't mean to scare you. There is still a chance that nothing of the sort would occur in September. (However, most of the changes would take place at the end of the cycle, in 2013.) I'm not really sure how else I could say it, or how much of it I could reasonably express without being called various names.
I've been talking about this for a while and will say no more than the above at this time.
- 25
The start of the "end of the world".
The gloves come off for 2013. From September 9 onwards is the beginning of something fantastic.
And you've got front row seats!
About 8 months ago I talked about how Obama's 'family' would become an issue. This led to a man called Brietbart being murdered, which itself opened a can of worms in all directions. I also talked about how the actors in these dramas would begin to be exposed. The LIBOR scandal is one of the biggest exposés (among others for the past few months), but not the biggest yet for 2012.
Events so powerful that they cause the ground to shake from a decade ago. (You'll get the hang of this 'flexible' time's pace soon enough.)
Your world is crumbling as we see ourselves in the reality that is before us (the dream world).
Better to talk about what is happening than what will happen. All is now.
Back to reading and calibrating. It may be a few days before I am properly 'adjusted'.
- 26
As I've mentioned before, what is considered the price of gold is not the actual monetary value of gold.
It is the value of the paper. (Paper gold)
Without the paper gold, the 'price of gold' would be closer to its actual value. (Which is quite a bit more than a couple of thousand US dollars.)
If you put all the gold in the world together it would not even fill 1 tennis court.
Now compare that with all of the investors around the world who think they're investing in gold when they're actually invested in the paper representation of it, and you can get an idea of the supply/demand problem.
- 27
I propose that we actually do want to believe in the fantasy (or the meta-fantasy if you will). The most powerful, wealthy, adored, and successful of us are those who create a fantasy and learn how to work with it.
It's no different when the fantasy is something that is seen on the news. We want to believe in the world that is created for us.
It makes it easier than to have to create it for ourselves. That is, realizing that we do create it for ourselves.
(It's not the we're lazy. We don't want to realize it because the potential feeling of loneliness is too great.)
The fantasy breaks down when we begin to see naked actors behind the scenes and, ultimately, see our selves at the helm.
This period is all about reality and perspective.
- 28
I propose that the 'truth' will n'ever be disclosed.
As the truth does not exist.
It is beyond all perspective.
We can try, though.
And here we are.
Trying to see the truth that cannot be seen.
Every stress, happiness, issue, word, war, etc., stems from this basic effort.
- 29
If something is there but not relative to your perspective then you will not experience it.
You will find a way not to disclude it from your logical narrative.
It will be 'filtered out', so to speak, in such a way that you know something is there but your mind avoids having to think about it.
Like most of the stimuli hitting your brain right now.
You don't need to experience it because you all ready are in a different way.
So you didn't need to see or believe anything about an 'event' in July because it happened to you anyway.
- 30
September is turning out to be an interesting month. We're not done yet, of course. We're just getting started. (Did you forget to bring the popcorn?)
"2012" did not begin in January. It begins in September, as I said in 2009. But the real 'end of the world' is in 2013. This is just practice.
The East/West hemispheres on the brain are in identity crises. There's other stuff in the pipeline, but needless to say there is (will be) so much going on simultaneously you won't know where to look or what to believe.
And that is the point.
"If you are me, then who am I?"
The dream world is what you make of it.
All for entertainment, of course. Hasn't it all ways been?
- 31
Could we be ready for something of what we are not yet aware?
It is more of a curiosity to see what lay ahead?
Indeed, "World War III" is becoming more relative, or so it seems. It is not a linear progression, of course. It is entirely up to you, so to speak.
What have you included in your perspective?
The reason I am here at this time is because there are some of us who have included such possibilities in their perspective.
The current issues that many are now thinking may lead to an other wold war have all been orchestrated by governments in the United States.
They mostly have to do with the petrodollar and the power of fiat currency. Without the ability to create money out of thin air, its position is diminished.
So it will do whatever it takes to fortify the currency. It will send Japan against China, a country that rightfully wants to price itself out of dollars. It will destroy Libya, a democratic country that was planning to unite Africa and create the Dinar. It will destroy Iran, a peaceful country who last attacked an other country when George Washington had just stepped down as president. Every major conflict in the world (values of perspective) is in one way or an other manipulated and managed by the US interests.
The 'old logic' will not prevail. But it will certainly fight to the death of itself.
See a few posts up about a short discussion on how this all ties together with changes in perspective.
- 32
The 'UFO' was done as (mostly) intended. As was noted, it was a group effort. I merely provided the direction. I consider it a great success and the first of its kind.
<<We will 'manifest ourselves' as a multitude of bright and colourful orbs in the daytime sky in front of a crowd of thousands, perhaps millions.>>
What is not realized and as was mentioned before there was, indeed, a UFO on July 18th. That was done by those in this forum. ("...in front of a crowd of thousands...")
However, the energy on July 18th was used for the Olympics opening ceremony, which was the nearest mass-scale event. ("...perhaps millions...")
We can be arguing about what did and did not happen until the end of time. Heck, we're still arguing about who shot Kennedy, the Moon landing, and 9/11.
The evidence is there for all to see.
Regarding Elenin, I overestimated the ability of the majority of persons on this forum to understand what it is about. Although I explained it in detail and at length, persons seem to bring their own beliefs and interpretation to the table.
Even before the event, I said several times that nothing "bad" will happen. That the event was more meaningful than physical. However, the evidence is there for all to see.
Regarding, "if you are reading this, then you probably didn't make it" how would you know if you did or not? Take what I say as light entertainment, but here I am back again when I said things would ramp up (September 2012).
And here you are.
Did you "make it"?
Take a look around. Your world is falling apart. I don't know how else to put it.
The dream perspective is trying to break though but you're still 'stuck' in the old perspective. How else do I say this?
I tend not to do and say things that others would want me to do and say. What purpose would that serve?
My words implore you to think for yourself. To figure it out. And even for you to help along the way, which many of you are starting to do more of.
It is not my intention to be "right". Sometimes I am intentionally wrong about things, or make mistakes, or even manipulate you for my own purposes.
However, I have put all my cards on the table. Am I who I say I am? (Does it really matter? I've said before that I don't actually want you to believe me. It's better if you think for yourself and use my words as a reference. If I told you exactly about everything then it would defeat the purpose entirely and I would look like a kosmik a-hole. But many of you would be quite satisfied.. for a short while. I am still waiting for the half-dozen or so persons whose 'mind I read' to even reply to my response about their innermost secrets.)
Really, how many of you want to do the work required to change perspectives? Many (not all) of you would prefer me to just tell you what to do.
This I am unable to do. It would seriously work against you.
I am still playing chess-not-checkers. A long game of chess. If you think I am "wrong" because I give up a piece on the chessboard it's entirely up to you. But sooner or later you're going to realize that something is a bit different about this chessboard.
I am the fool who jumps out of a plane without a parachute and magically lands on my feet whilst you turned your head to look at the girl in the red dress and claimed I was on the ground the whole time. It matters not to me what you saw or didn't see. I only care to remind you of the course of events to mark values in perspective so that I may return again.
My jumping out of the plane is a marker for me to get back here no matter if you see it or not.
So here we are.
Many of you have made tremendous changes in perspectives over the years that I have posted. It's very refreshing.
Is anything in this thread true?
Probably not :)
The truth is beyond perception.
- 33
Not big and mean :)
Just a destroyer.
No different that how you COMPLETELY OBLITERATED what you call "yesterday".
That was a whole world just... gone.
Changing perspectives is what we do all the time without realizing it.
The idea is to do it more consciously. Thus, the dream world. Here, the nature of perspective is more readily seen so that we can see a connection between one perspective and the next.
I didn't know that I was so tolerant but I'll take it :) thank you
- 34
There is an other nexus point at September 26th (about 12 noon CST).
It usually means that 'something' will occur. (It does not have to be at 12 noon but should be within 4 hours of it.)
Nothing "bad". And it does not mean a physical event per se, but such nexi usually have a more physically-exprssed representation.
No need to prepare for anything, or fear anything. But there is a shift of sorts. A change in the wind.
My first post in about a year was about the current world situation: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
The event/nexus on September 26 is the "unexpected" that I referred to a few days ago, on September 14.
Several months ago it was mentioned that I would return in September and that it would be the beginning. It was also stated that some of you (in the States, for example) may not be able to leave the country after September. This still stands, but of course nothing is set in stone.
Here I am illustrating the shift in perspectives that may occur. This is a reference point for your 'consciousness' so that it can get its bearings a bit more easily.
It does not matter what these events are or whether or not you perceive them directly. What matters is the value of the relationships. It's enough simply to know that they're there.
These things are a kind of combination lock that will open up new modes of perspective. (To put it an other way.)
You still have a choice, so to speak. You are not being punished for anything, of course. Consider it an entertaining affair where it does not really matter what you choose.
Whatever you miss you will experience at an other time.
Whatever you don't choose will choose you later, in some way.
The choice is more of a question:
"How far do I go?", or, "To what extent am I?"
This is where you consider, if you wish, what is "you" and what is "not you".
That is the only battle that will ever be, and is not really a battle at all.
If you don't wish to see everything else as you you have all of eternity to redecide.
1, 5, a thousand, or a billion years... it does not really matter.
Eventually you will know that you can only perceive of what is you.
And that is the only purpose of anything that exists. To point the finger back at you long enough for you to see it.
- 35
One thing you may want to prepare for, psychologically, is the possibility of having people from an other world make themselves known on Earth.
I do not know if it is by craft, teleportation, car, bus, or train. But it should be before the year is out.
"How far do I go?"
- 36
Any time that much energy comes together there are effects.
The direct physical representation appeared to be a series of earthquakes in Alaska.
However, the 'unseen' effects usually take about 2 days (3 at most) to manifest in the kind of physicality you experience.
So basically it's like eating something on Monday that takes 2 days to work itself in your body (perspective) and that would be a new part of your perspective on Wednesday.
This one is a bit strange. I don't exactly know what it is. But the last time it had the same 'appearance' was September 9, 2001.
(I'm not saying that something bad will happen. It's merely an observation of what you'd call energy.)
The more energy that comes together (such as in a nexus) the greater the possibility.
Beings from other perspectives, such as myself, use these to do our thing.
- 37
Generally-speaking, if your intent is to 'create more gold in your experience' then you would do well not to use gold as your symbol.
This is telling the universe (for lack of better illustration), "Gold looks like this! And this is what I want in my perspective."
On the other hand you use a bubble-gum symbol proclaiming, "Gold has other values of which I am not aware. But here I am with my bubble gum gold, exploring the extent of what gold really is in my perspective."
For that, you are rewarded (so to speak) with the different values of gold.
It's like you have discovered the secret of "gold" as being not-gold but everything else.
So the relative values become more a part of your experience.
You experience more gold and more bubble gum gold, and more of everything surrounding your the new value of gold.
- 38
What if emotions are a different kind of logic than what we normally refer to as logic?
Do we not feel a certain emotion for a reason? Then it is logical, though from what seems like a different perspective.
Appearance is a representation, like any other. The substance is itself a representation. A book is thus comprised of only covers (only of further representations of something else). How deep do we want to dig? Not far. Bypassing the easiest-to-perceive representation would be a waste of energy, and that's a universal no-no.
If you perceived the substance of something instead of what it looks like on the surface, you would still be missing that which the substance represents.
- 39
Think of it this way... you are only dreaming because that reality is without names, classification, categorization, etc.
Dreaming reality = without the names
Waking reality = with the names
The moment you begin to name (or want to name) is when you start to become more physically-oriented (i.e., start to wake up). Then, a different kind of logic is at play. Thus, a different kind of potentiality and interaction.
So now (2001-2013) is the period of time, in waking reality, when you aren't sure what something is, or how to classify it, and what to name it. Some may call this confusion. Others may see it as fluid representation.
This is when you are at the doorway to the dream world ;)
You are dreaming now. It is that part of your perspective that is without names or classification.
You could say that you experience something physically (named) and then also experience the same thing when you're
dreaming (unnamed), simultaneously. It just seems like a different time because you want to give a name to it (i.e., "it happened at 5:32 pm, at this location, and for this reason") when really it is the same thing.
- 40
Nothing here is said that you don't inherently understand all-ready.
The question then, I suppose, is could you have expressed your current understanding to your 'previous' self?
And, would your life not be a prologue to your current understanding?
We have only arrived here because of the road we have taken.
To think that we could have just taken a shortcut would be missing something much greater. Perhaps even the key to further understanding.
- 41
Redefine what a wall is and it will no longer be what you've come to believe.
However, when you see the wall as something you could walk through you're not doing anything but further solidifying the ideal of the wall as something that needs to be overcome.
The way to walk through a wall is not sexy. Make the wall irrelevant and it is not there to begin with.
I know you're talking about walking through a wall but it sort of defeats itself. You have to first set up the reality of the wall as that which is to be overcome. Your purpose may be quite confusing to your perspective and you'd end up with that which utilizes the least amount of energy... frustration or a bruised head, for example.
On an other hand, you are already walking through a wall you did not know was there simply by having made it irrelevant to your perspective. It's not cool or sexy but neither is real teleportation.
Ask yourself, how would walking through the wall be logical to your perspective?
Most attempts to do such a thing are not, and thus are met with frustration.
If (somehow) it were logical to your perspective, most likely you'd find that the wall becomes irrelevant and you probably would not perceive of the wall at all.
- 42
Your body is a representation of the source of perspective. Without some kind of focus there would be no perception.
However, the body does not pick up the cup.
The contents are not there to spill.
The floor is not there to move feet across.
There is perspective. By nature we create relationships that do not exist in order to try to perceive ourselves. This infinite geometry of relationships is the fabric of our existence. In order for the illusion to sustain itself it must be in constant motion and thus we are in constant motion through our perceptions. We must all ways be doing something and have some kind of relationship, even when apparently not doing anything.
The body does not pick up the cup because the body and the cup are illusions within this geometry.
The only action is a constant and pervasive moving of the illusions. When the illusions interact a reality is created because the relationship between the illusions is real.
And this is everything you've come to know.
- 43
I hesitate to answer these kinds of questions because of their implications. But I will do so anyway. Perhaps we are more ready than we were before.
One's interpretation does not develop and is not built upon. The interpretation is the geometry of relationships, and all have an equal value because there is nothing actually there.
There is no evolution, no change, and nothing is actually happening.
A thought experiment, if I may...
Imagine that you are in a one-dimensional, empty room. It is completely dark and there is nothing to perceive. Let's call this room Geniisys. Boom! You have named it something, creating the first relationship. This thought, this possibility, creates the second dimension. You write the name, Geniisys, in the air as you name it. This outlines a space. You now have three dimensions. You utter the name into the space you have formed, creating farther varieties of relationships. This goes on ad infinitum until all the stars, dust, light, culture, and tricycles are created. You are simply creating relationships out of something that does not exist, and this is endlessly recursive.
The above is an illustration of perspective. You take two things that do not exist to form a relationship that "does" exist (or at least one that you can perceive). You do not perceive of the things directly (because they do not exist) but only your relationship with them. This relationship does not really exist, either, but the value that seems to be created from the relationship is something that we can use, and thus seems real.
That which exists is true and cannot be perceived. It is beyond perception and without perspective.
So in a way we are experiencing our relationship with that which does not exist. There is an infinite variety of these experiences and perceptions because it is impossible for us to define this relationship.
Although these relationships seem to change it all happens simultaneously (as it is an illusion). It is your perspective that seems to change, not the relationships.
That is the nature of perspective.
So instead of evolving or building upon something you are perceiving the next logical relationship, so to speak. This does not happen in time. It seems to happen in time because you are experiencing these relationships at the speed of perception.
Independent of the illusion of time there is neither change nor evolution.
All of these things, you could say, are hitting you at the same time. You are simultaneously in a distant star 40 trillion years into the past (5 billions years by your measurement) and here and now eating cereal. However, you are only able to perceive one relationship at a time. You naturally perceive what is most related to an other perception.
This "one" relationship could include countless other relationships. You could be perceiving 500, 5 trillion, or 5 relationships right now, but it would still be a single relationship.
But you perceive it as one relationship, and it is perspective.
In this way what we consider evolution or building upon something is including more relationships into this geometry (what I call an expanded perspective, although that is a misnomer).
Right now we are surrounded by things we have represented. They may seem to appear separate from us, because we have made them so through our representation and logic, and thus interaction and potential energy.
When we "un-name" something and take away the representation we realize more of this nothing and instead of perceiving a relationship with it we absorb it into our perspective, so to speak.
That is to say, instead of it being perceived as being separate from us and something with which we can have a relationship we realize we are that thing.
In this way we build upon it by absorbing it into who we are (taking away the relationship). But at this point it cannot be perceived and we cannot know about it.
The more you cannot perceive something the more it is the source of who you are.
There is no shared construct. It is there but it does not exist. (Apologies, but English has its constraints.)
There is no newborn unless you are the newborn :)
Your perception of the newborn is the newborn's total existence. There is no need for further values to exist unless they need to. This would be a waste of energy. When you are not perceiving the newborn crying, baby does not. If you are talking on the phone with someone who has a newborn, neither the newborn nor the person are there in physical form. They exist only as they need to in your perspective (a certain range of what you'd call the audio spectrum, for example).
We perceive that which is most relative, yes. But we also do not perceive that which is not relative. The bottom of your foot may not be relative to your current experience. If you're not looking at it now, for example, it need not have color, texture, etc. (There is no need to render it, as one person on this thread has suggestively illustrated.)
The potential for the "shared construct" is there but it is always unused and does not exist. When you perceive of something else you are actually perceiving of yourself (because it is your perspective).
It's quite difficult to grasp that one, for most. "Of course my friend exists! I just spoke with them!" But you do not know of your friend outside of your current perspective. In fact, there is nothing you could have perceived outside of your current perspective. Outside it, there is nothing.
Gravity is not there. Only some effects of what you would consider gravity. If you're not measuring light at this particular instant, for example, it has no speed. When you want to measure light then the speed will become relative to your experience and you will see a value. (The speed of light is actually the speed of physical perception that will change in a bit, but that's an other story.)
You came up with the idea of gravity because it is logical to your perspective. Things are relative to the ground you walk on, usually, so things tend to stick there. Gravity is the same as living where you do, or thinking what you are, etc. It is an effect of perceiving things that are relative. The same force that attracts also repels. (It doesn't do either, but only seems to.)
The law of conservation of energy is not actually outside your perspective nor does it define it. It is the only method by which we perceive. That is to say, 'perception' and this law is the same thing.
In this way you are bound to perceive that which takes the least amount of energy to perceive. But it does not mean you are limited. It means you have only to make something relative to your perspective in order to experience it.
You are actually experiencing all things simultaneously, right now. But you do not perceive it. The nature of perspective is this energy conservation.
The moment you begin to perceive, you could say, is the moment when you perceive what is nearest to you first. Looking "over there" first is for the curious and is certainly possible, but it would take an infinite amount of energy to do so. (It's not a law, but you'd most likely give up long before you experienced results.)
Yes, you can only go to perception-gym and gradually create logical steps. But, 2 things:
1) If you can figure it out, you can relate one thing to an other, seemingly unrelated thing
2) You have all the time in the universe *lol*
Personally, I don't think I'm very patient. That's where Ecsys comes in.
Keep in mind that everything contains everything else (so to speak, even though most things are not fully-realized) so it's just a matter of finding that thing (or experience, whatever) in what is most relative to you now.
The table you're sitting at has all of the properties of the newest spaceship. You just have to find them :)
- 44
The "central source" is Nothing.
Things move because we make this nothing complex (so that we can perceive it, or at least have the illusion of perceiving it).
This nothing cannot be perceived, because it cannot be represented.
The perceiver is only where it needs to be.
The environment is an element of perspective, as is the body.
- 45
An analogy would be how we experience a movie.
In a movie still images are put together in a logical order. The images are representations of something else, illusions.
A reality is created not from the illusions (images) but from the relationships between the illusions.
Now imagine all of these images lay on the ground in a random order. Your mind will automatically begin to relate some images together in a way that makes sense to it. (It doesn't matter where you start, like in a dream.) Your mind will then perceive a reality based on the relationships between the first few images. It will also automatically find more images that it thinks should come next. It may be a different kind of logic from someone else, but it makes sense for the narrative you're putting together.
The point here is that you're creating something that seems real by putting two or more things together (that are not real).
- 46
Keep in mind that although scientists can theorize about (and find evidence for) particles that travel faster than the speed of light, they can only perceive the results at or less than this speed of light.
An inch will be measured as an inch, even when it's not.
The instrument that is used for the measurement is rarely considered, but often they are observing the effects of the instrument rather than what is being observed.
You could say that the instrument is a reference of interpretation. Looking through an electron microscope we do not see electrons. We see the electron microscope.
If you invented a new gestalt spectrometer that is meant to capture light's oompa particles, you'd probably find them. You might even consider the oompa particles to be a new property of light. Others could then find the same particles (verifying your results) using the same instrument, but not other instruments.
So, while faster-than-light particles 'exist' they cannot be perceived.
- 47
In both cases, you are setting up an experience where the wall or the bill is not needed.
They become irrelevant to your perspective. In these new realities:
1) There is no need to go through the wall; and
2) The bill does not need to be there (or does not need to be paid, etc)
Let's say for #1 you are stuck in a room with no exit. Unless you find a way to somehow go through the wall you will die.
So you think back to this thread and, after a few frustrating hours, find out how to make the wall irrelevant to your experience.
[for sake of illustration and lack of better terms...] One moment you are sitting on the floor with your eyes closed. The next moment you are sitting in a park, outside of the wall. You will probably not have a memory of the transition, as it is no longer relevant. You may look over and see a wall that kind of makes you feel uncomfortable. You will remember that a few hours ago you were at home because this will be your new perspective. Even though the 'old perspective' still exists it is no longer relevant for you.
If there is someone else in the walled cell with you they may see you de-materialize as you walk through the wall. But your experience will most likely be very similar to the above.
- 48
The table does not become the spaceship by itself.
You discover the spaceship in it. Meaning, it 'morphs' into a spaceship in your mind. But not as the spaceship you know (hence, unseen) but the one you don't know (yet).
Realize that the spaceship and the table are the same thing. However, because its essence (nothing) cannot be contained in any one perception it appears to be separate when it is perceived.
(It may be more than two things in your perspective, but for this illustration let's say it is one.)
If your desire is to build a new spaceship then you can start with anything. Taking the nearest table, you would treat it as though it had properties of an advanced spaceship.
This, in a way, coaxes your perception into uncovering those properties for you. The values are all ready there but they did not previously have any reason to be perceived. Now you are giving them a reason.
This does not mean that your table will magically turn into a spaceship. However, it does mean that the spaceship will become more relative to your perspective. Because you are all ready perceiving 'parts' of it.
So the table is a stepping-stone to the new spaceship. It's distance to your perspective really depends on how relative it is to it.
A couple of examples of how this could play out:
1) Opening the table's drawer that you never really noticed was there leads you to a stack of papers that your father had. They are university transcripts. You see that his marks for science were quite high and suddenly you feel confident that science is what you should do. You soon enroll at a local university's physics program and the rest is history.
2) Turning the table upside down and riding on it for a couple of hours was fun, especially when the cat joined in. But somehow you got a wooden splinter on your rear and now you're driving to the nearest pharmacy, sans cat. While there you meet an old friend. Memories are briefly shared. He shows you a picture of something that he found in his garage on his mobile, and this makes you think of a new invention that will evolve into a spaceship in 20 years.
These are both logical narratives for your mind. It is relating one thing to an other thing in a way that makes sense to it.
The table 'becomes' the spaceship in this way. It may be 5 minutes or 5 years or, depending on how relative it is, may never be experienced. But it is all ready experienced now, in some way.
The question then is, "How many steps from here to there?"
How do you get there? You start with the first thought, and take the path of least resistance.
In both examples above you may claim that Chaol is nuts and Ecsys does not work. But it is how perspective works. It is not magic. It is logic.
This is what we do all of the time. It is how we go from what seems like one experience to the next. We can make something more relative to our experience by uncovering it in our current experience, then it becomes more logical for us to experience (and then we experience more of it).
- 49
Hi. Thanks for your patience regarding this. (I've been thinking of a more advanced application that I can easily illustrate in English, per your last line.)
But for sensory deprivation, I would say that it is not possible to deprive the senses. As I mentioned before there is one 'sense' that is interpreted in various ways such as thought, dreams, and what is called five senses of taste, touch, hearing, etc.
If you 'deprive' one of these interpretations your total sense is not affected. That is to say, you are still perceiving at the same level. However, if you decrease your 'hearing sense' then you will increase an other interpretation.
(It is not that it increases. It is more that you pay more attention to the other interpretations.)
It is the same thing when you drift into sleepyland. If you decrease a certain kind of thinking ('alert thought', for example) you will probably become more aware of your dream sense (your dream interpretation of your reality).
However, you were dreaming all along. You just did not interpret your relationships that way so much. (i.e., you weren't really paying attention to it)
So if your sensory deprivation chamber worked perfectly then you would just become more aware of one of your other interpretations of reality. Perhaps you'd pay more attention to your dreams, for example.
- 50
The symbol does not change. An interpretation of the symbol's relationship with other symbols changes.
Really, there is no symbol. None of these symbols (from which you perceive the relationships) actually exist. A symbol only has value in relation to other symbols. So we're not perceiving of the symbol itself but the relationships between them. (What I call the geometry of relationships.)
But for your example, the "golden era of happiness for all" symbol would be quite difficult to represent. You would be representing it from your current perspective. However, you may not be aware of how your other perspectives see it. Thus, it is not likely that you are interpreting your symbol as having changed into it. It is more likely that you are not paying attention to how it is working in your perspective.
Not that you did, but if you created a "golden era of happiness for all" symbol it may turn into the "parade of monkeys from hell" 10 logical steps down the road. In fact, I'm guessing it would because then your total perspective would respond to your passive declaration of, "I know what happiness means for everyone."
Really, there is no need to concern yourself with anyone else in the sense that you see a separation. (This is why, oftentimes, when we help someone else it evolves that our help makes them worse off. Because at the time, in these cases, we had not realized the separation between us and them is an illusion. The less you realize that you and an other person is the same thing the more conflict you would experience.)
So it may be that you view but you are seeing a 'golden era of happiness for all' and are missing how it logically applies to your intention.
Also, "logical right now" and "logical" are a bit different. This one is a bit tricky because we tend to think we know what would logically come next.
You'll notice that I normally append 'all things considered' when I mention 'the next logical step'. Because a more total perspective must be considered.
So something may happen to you that does not make sense. We can say that this is completely logical, all things (in your perspective) considered, but perhaps not logical for a few values in your perspective.
For example, George may wonder why he got hurt when he asked his best friend for help. "It doesn't make sense", he may exclaim. "I did everything I could. I tried to see how I could best help my friend and I asked nicely. But he just got upset and me and said I was treating him like a baby."
But George is forgetting that there are more values in the geometry of relationships than what is most on his mind at this moment. He is also not considering that both he and his friend are his interpretations.
When he desires to help his friend, does he realize that he wants to help himself? Does he believe his motives to be self-less. It may seem a noble thing, to help someone else, but it may actually work against him if he does not consider that his friend is him. All of what he knows and feels about his friend exist entirely within his own perception.
Also, of course, there may be a lot of things he is ignoring in his own perspective. Perhaps it was not easy to help his friend. He had to jump through hoops to position himself to help his friend. He was actually working against the natural course of things, which creates further conflict.
He then sees nature putting him back into place (putting himself again in the path of least resistance) as a kind of punishment or conflict in his reality.
He focuses on help but ignores the more valuable Relationship. Instead of interacting with him he communicates to himself about how he can best help him. He seeks to be the hero (further resisting himself as his friend) if only for a short time. Again, all the while ignoring the value of the relationships and also basic interaction.
So, again, something may be logical in a more expansive way but may not make sense to you if you are ignoring certain relationships. (Your relationship with more things.)
There is different kind of logic, of course. Each perspective is a logic.
If you have a symbol that represents 'automated income' you should probably further define that that is and what it means. (Automated how, and income of what?)
You may get exactly what you wanted but it may not make sense to you because you did not realize that there are different kinds of perspective. Perhaps you'd win a lifetime supply of peanuts or every Monday at 6pm your neighbor visits you (automated income).
Or perhaps it would become 'a golden era of happiness for all of what I am', depending on your interpretation.
So basically you would do well to define 'automated income' for more than your current perspective. Find out exactly what you mean. If you need multiple representations that's fine. At least you will have then focused your perspective on it.
If it appeared that your symbol changed into 'golden era of happiness for all' perhaps it is because that is how your your more expansive perspective interpreted it.
It's not about goals at all. It is only about relationships. So it is possible that your relationships with money [I'm not sure if this is how you defined 'income', though] had changed. As your relationships change so would your reality.
- 51
Something is relative through its relationships with you.
If you are a classical pirate searching for buried treasure, for example, you would begin by creating relationships with what you perceive to be the reality of the buried treasure.
You begin to 'perceive' the buried treasure is in a dark cavern with a waterfall with bats perched above it, for example, in a daydream. (The pirate begins to see it in his current perspective. You current perspective, of course, would include your thoughts, dreams, senses, etc.)
He can then develop a relationship with waterfalls and bats in order to bring the reality of the buried treasure nearer.
Think 'six degrees of separation'. You want to meet Kevin Bacon so you start by meeting the person that is closest to you in order to get there. Each logical step is a degree of separation.
You would not start out by finding buried treasure. That would probably not work. You need to uncover the logical path to it. You find it, in a way, through peripheral perspective.
- 52
When using symbols be sure to begin with a new symbol that has little value to your current perspective. (If you use a plain table then the table all ready has a value associated with it in your perspective, and would thus cloud your experience.) Usually this is accomplished by creating a new thing.
If you want to transform the table into something new in order to uncover the spaceship, that can work too. This is because you are re-interpreting what the table is. You are realizing the nature of perspective. That there is no time or space between the table and the spaceship, only your illusion of the separation.
At first the table is the table. Then you re-interpret what the table is, creating logical steps to your spaceship. You don't need to know what the 5th step will be or how it will make sense later. Your map need only include the next step, not the total steps.
(This is because if you are at 'Step 1' it is impossible for you to interpret 'Step 5' from the perspective of 'Step 4'. Your interpretation of Step 5 would then be from Step 1's perspective, and that would be useless because it would change by the time you got there.)
When you open the drawer you are already re-interpreting it as something else. You begin to see the table as the spaceship itself. You then de-anchor it from its tableness and see more of how it is connected with all things. Perhaps you'll just see that it's composed of wood and then observe the pieces of wood and think about how wood can be made into other things. Perhaps it is the shape. Perhaps if you bring it close to your nose and absorb the scent that it will smell like cookies and you will think about how the table is a giant cookie and there are cookies on your spaceship.
It's all about relationships and creating a logical path to an other perspective.
- 53
Though we are only at the beginning of what you may call the 2nd level of Ecsys, what we can do is apply what we have learned in new ways.
I believe you can use the following exercise for a more advanced illustration of Ecsys.
But first, a synopsis of the elements.
Symbol - a representation of anything else
Interaction - when a symbol (including yourself) relates with an other symbol
Possibility - the potential energy of a symbol (without interaction of any kind)
Logic - structure or order of any kind
(for your reference, see [link to ecsys.org] )
Expanded Perspective Exercise
As an exercise we will take one of the above elements (as it seems in our perspective) and remove the other elements that enable it to form your reality.
Let's say that I have a symbol; an old coin that my grandfather gave me. (A symbol can be anything. Everything that you can sense is a symbol. It need not have a special meaning.)
For us to expand our perspective in this exercise means that you are realizing how it is a value of your perspective, not a separate thing outside of who you are. We can do this exercise with one thing, move on to other things, and then eventually feel more at ease with expanding our perspective to include more of what we are (everything in it, and without it).
As we reconnect we first get an idea for how the other elements work with the symbol. This means identifying, from your perspective, how it Interacts, where its Possibilities converge, and what its Logic is.
We may realize that no one else interacts with it. However, keep in mind that interaction is about perspective rather than people. If it's kept in the closet then it is also interacting with the other items in the closet and its environment, because it has developed a relationship with those things. It also interacts with other similar coins because that may be how you value it, even if those coins are nowhere near its physical space. Farther, we keep it in the closet in a small plastic envelope (possibility and potential energy; or its "space" if that suits you better). For logic, every year around Christmas (when grandpa gave it to us) we take it out and polish it.
To expand your perspective, change the values of the elements. When you change the values you are not only changing your relationship with that thing but seeing how expansive your perspective really is.
Interaction - change its relationships with other things.
Possibility - change the space in which it rests. Take it out of its plastic envelope and find a new home for it.
Logic - Change or create a new structure for it.
The above exercise is actually quite simple. You take an element (any element of the 4), define the other 3 elements around it, and change the values of those elements.
If your chosen thing is of the logic element then edit its symbol, possibilities, and interaction. If it's of the potential energy (possibility) element then play around with its logic, interaction, and symbol. Et cetera.
By doing this exercise you are expanding your own interpretation of the elements. When you do it for one thing in your reality you are learning how to do it for all, as there is no real difference between the two.
Eventually, you may be comfortable enough to do this automatically throughout the day. For example, you may find that when you look at your sun and realize its elements you can actually become it.
Time and space will then be just references for you. You'll perceive less separation between you and 'anything else'. There will be much less limit to what you can perceive (and do) because you will have more conscious influence about your perspective.
Hope this helps. This is still 'basic' (though not very basic) but it may prove valuable to many of you, if done.
- 54
You are everywhere surrounded by symbols. Without them, you would not be able to perceive anything. Some symbols have more 'potential energy' than others, and thus could be thought of as being powerful symbols.
Not all symbols you perceive while dreaming or meditating are powerful, of course. Most aren't.
How do you know which ones are powerful symbols? Imagine that your symbols were like cities strewn across a continent. Some of these symbols will have more of this potential energy and will attract other symbols. It is the reason why cities like New York became very popular but Edison did not.
Symbols are only powerful through their relationships. So just look to see which ones form more relationships than others.
Most symbols cannot be drawn. What you experienced could have been an interpretation of something else, or even an other symbol that was not easily perceived.
Just remember that when you draw the symbol you are not capturing its essence but only drawing a reference. The symbol represents something you cannot draw.
A symbol (per the Genius) would be a unique symbol that you create. If you use a symbol that you perceived while dreaming it all ready has meaning attached to it, and likely would not work.
Come up with a unique symbol in this world, and work with it from there. Have an intention in mind but make no assumptions about it. Just see where it takes you. Often, it will take you on a particular route to your destination that you could not have imagined.
- 55
To add...
remember that a chocolate mint ice cream cone is an illusion. So when you, for example, 'wish' for it you are not really wishing for anything because there is no ice cream cone.
You have to wish around it. Meaning, you are bringing the perspective about that contains the ice cream cone relationships.
What does it mean to engage new ice cream cone perspectives? Well, think about what it means. Maybe someone else wants to have a bite.. who is it? You need napkins. What do they look like? It makes you thirsty. What's your drink? Darn, it fell on the carpet! What do you need to use to clean it up? It makes you feel happy and bloated afterwards. What is that like and when else have you felt that way?
The ice cream cone exists only in these relationships.
Perceive the relationships and the cone will begin to be experienced.
(The cone itself is irrelevant. However, the cone can become more relevant by perceiving its relationships. Don't think about the cone directly.)
- 56
For the curious...
the recent events in the skies and below ground are the 'logical steps' before this kind of contact (as noted in the quote above).
We are redefining what is above our heads and below our feet as we expand our perspective, and this is a part of that. We are growing in all directions. Some of us are even getting plump and juicy! lol
There are tremendous seas of lava now shifting below your feet (as I've pointed out in the Farpoint Station thread) and tremendous seas of 'space lava' shifting above your head, too.
These are representations of course. As we progress we will redefine what they are.
The lava under your feet will be reinterpreted as something else, as will the symbols above your head.
The 'return of the gods', indeed. That is to say, re-membering your expanded perspective.
- 57
There's no way to predict that. But, based on 'historical' realities, there's no clear evidence that it would serve a real purpose.
If I showed you a photo of da Vinci, for example, it would most likely be considered unreal even if authenticated. Rather than expand perspective it would narrow it in certain ways. We make so many assumptions about things.
The nature of perspective is that we do not know when it has changed. Most of us would be entirely shocked to experience the realities that existed only 100 years ago. Simply talking to a commoner requires a skill that very few of us now have. The act of walking down most streets requires dexterity and patience. Eating and drinking would kill most of us. Imagine the realities of an other world and the perspective-shock that comes with it.
When you think of life in the 1920s is the first picture that comes to your mind in color or black and white?
Now imagine that I showed you one photo from 1200 years ago. This would narrow perspective to such an extent that it would become more difficult to experience such a time (time travel, etc.) because it would be difficult to decrease the value of the symbol.
Further, imagine that I showed you photos of Mars. It looked red, barren, and lifeless. You would begin to imagine that those were the values most associated with Mars, a planet as beautiful and with as many living trees as Earth.
It would be as though a rover from Mars landed in the Sahara and transmitted the images back to Mars and everything was yellow.
Instead of expanding perspective the mere act of showing a single photo would require me to show additional photos, and further evidence in order to 'fix' what was done. Further, the topic of conversation would shift to Chaol and my life, and I would need to explain pretty much every aspect of the photos. It would be a waste of energy and would likely not help, unfortunately.
Just consider this lite entertainment, instead. A hoax, even. And that I have no photos to show.
- 58
Actually, by focusing on what you think it is you are making its possibility more irrelevant.
If someone, for example, thinks that they want to be rich and focuses on how they can win their local lottery (to get there) I would suggest that they forget about the lottery. "The lottery" is their interpretation of "being rich" and limits their perspective. If they, instead, focus on what surrounds the perspective of being rich they are more likely to experience what they're looking for.
Because "being rich" exists only in relation to other things and not by itself.
By focusing on "being rich" directly they are not really focusing on anything and, thus, would not experience it until they focused on it indirectly.
Hope this melts your ice cream :)
- 59
1) They need only be something that has no meaning (or close to no meaning) in your perspective. You can buy something that has no meaning, but as soon as you buy it it adopts some meaning. A friend could give you something unique, but the act of your friend giving it to you begins to define it. So I would suggest creating something new, whereby it has the least possibility of having been defined from other values.
2) If you start over in a particular corridor, did you choose the corridor or did the corridor choose you? One need not start over to walk the path of least resistance. Emotions make us human, of course, but they also help to cloud this path. We tend to choose that which has meaning for us rather than that which has our name on it. If 4 doors open up before you and your friends and family are beyond door #3, most of us would choose door #3 because we are human. We tend to think something is wrong if it's too easy.
3) We are all aware the same. The question is, what values are we focusing on? It's quite difficult to feel alone in a reality where anything is possible. There's a fantasy that we have in this world about 'omnipotent' beings being all-knowing and all-seeing. It is not that such beings see everything, because we all do. It is that such beings have the ability to 'figure it out' so to speak. They need not know the latest fashion trends of anteaters on Neptune but should be able to figure it out if they wanted to. So there's always the sense of constant discovery because the entire universe is exactly what you are experiencing right now (which only goes so far as your current perspective). The rest is, fortunately, a mystery because it does not need to exist yet. [I am only able to respond to the first part of your question, as I am not able to guess your definition of 'divine source'.]
4) "Immediate" according to my sense of time, yes. This would be translated as one of my days being about 43 of your days. (Although it's not quite like that. If you and I were having tea and crumpets, though, you may get bored after the 15th hour of sitting there whereas I would think the fun has just begun!) This is only because I am able to relate a moment, so to speak, with more 'other moments' than we usually do on this world. I only understand and know about simultaneity. We each experience it but are not able to perceive of the experience ;)
5) For fun I like to watch stupid movies, play games (including videogames), build things, go for walks, travel, hang out, dance, and pretend to read as I watch people from cafe windows.
6) What explanation could there possibly be? I don't normally dissect my experience, so am not sure how to respond.
7) I've many names, of course. But for the name that I was given at birth I share it with others. To find me you need only close your eyes. b) the apps are vapourware, as the developer I found did not really understand how it should work. More importantly, it is an example of its possibility rather than something I give to you. This way it has more value. c) anyone is free to create whatever neuronics or ecsys apps they please, in any format. If they profit from it, that's fine. If it's for the public domain, even better. I usually don't comment, as this would be limiting the possibility of it more.
8) No comment. But I'm usually amazed how easily distracted we all are by smoke and mirrors.
9) "Truth" is irrelevant, as it cannot be perceived and, thus, experienced. It is probably better to just think about what is true for us at the time and realize that this is in constant motion. Besides "now", I don't know anything about the eternal. Need there be anything else?
- 60
A bit more advanced application of Ecsys, but it may have some value to you now...
[First, some context...] Everything is a representation of something else in your perspective. We are not able to perceive beyond our own perspective and thus cannot perceive of the truth of something. Truth is beyond perception.
When you talk on the phone what you hear is a representation of the other person's voice. When you see them in person you are also experiencing a representation. You could say that your brain interprets signals and shows you something that isn't really there. But the signals that your brain perceives are also representations of something else.
When you look into the mirror you are not seeing yourself. In the same manner when you look at your hand you are not perceiving your hand directly, but interacting with representations.
Direct perception is impossible. We can perceive only of relationships rather than the real thing.
In this illusion we have life. We have what we call consciousness. But this life comes only from the relationships between the symbols.
[And here is the purpose of this post...]
There is also life and consciousness between other symbols. Everything that has a relationship with something else has this life and consciousness. It is as real and fully detailed as what you are experiencing now.
The floor on which you walk has a relationship with your leg, and you feel it's reality. It is a part of your life. But the floor also has relationships with other things, and this is just as real as is your leg.
You are surrounded not only by life but also by a force that you could call a living, breathing consciousness. It has intelligence, desires, and it communicates.
It is perspective.
If you communicate, so does everything else. In the same way that you are now communicating. Whatever you do or say or think is also expressed throughout the universe in the same way and to a degree that is relative to your perspective.
When you go to a restaurant, for example, your cat at home also goes to the same restaurant at the same time.
Did you order and eat pasta? Your watch has also ordered and eaten pasta, because it is relative to your perspective. Even more than the cat because the watch rests on your arm and you don't see your cat. But, guess what? Your cat is also in the restaurant.
This is the real "holographic universe". It is a holographic universe not of bits and bytes of information but of perspective.
The Earth is going through the same thing that you are going through right now because there is no difference. Feeling giddy? You have just changed what scientists would call the quantum nature of the entire universe in a measurable way.
I implore you to figure out what this means for yourself. There is something profound that you can get from the above. You have only to squeeze the oranges. I will not post it here (or confirm or deny if any of you should mention its implications) because it is a highly resisted concept.
- 61
You could say that Western society has been going downhill since the late 1970's.
Anyway, the witch-hunt possibility is for a social concept that works to advance society. Not any one group of people but more of an idea.
It would be like if we began to jail those who wanted to think for themselves. Or didn't want to be exposed to advertising. Or did not have friends.
"She's a witch", "He's a communist", "He's a terrorist", "He's an alien", and so on.
- 62
The spaces are not actually blank. Perhaps on the website it is implied but in your perspective all have equal value (because there is really only one thing being perceived, or seemingly perceived).
Imagine waves in the ocean. You may see waves when there is really only one body of water. You see waves because perceiving them as separate is easier than perceiving them as one thing.
Some waves are bigger than others. Some have a different value than others in your perspective.
You can say that you see one thing but it has variations in its consistency. These variations (values) appear to be separate objects or things.
You are paying attention to that which is easiest to pay attention to. The "loudest" things in your perspective, so to speak.
But the loudest and the quietest are the same things.
What you see as blank space is an other symbol. (You have here attached a value to it by calling it a blank space and assuming it has no value. That itself is that value you have assigned. But it is a blank space with an airplane around it, so again that is value.)
- 63
It would be defined as, "Everything is a value in the current perspective."
All that exists is extant here and now, in some way.
All time and space, a value in your now and here.
Those that are least relative (for now) are usually referred to as far away in space or time. More relative, closer.
A premonition is simply perceiving what is all ready here in a "partial" way. The event on November 16 and 27, for example, may be perfectly represented by the new angle of the television on the console and its relationship to everything around it. When you perceive this relationship in a different way you have a 'premonition' and not really know where it came from. But it was all ready there.
It could be any relationship of any physical or non-physical thing. (Though as I've stated before thoughts and dreams are also physical, as are light, sound, etc.)
- 64
When you think of 'where' you are, what do you think about? Most people feel they are in their head, because that's where their eyes are.
But do you also perceive from your hands? Not as much, even though you have a sense of touch.
So what separates your hand from the keyboard? "You" from "something else"?
One is mobile and relevant on a more constant basis. The other is transient and dynamic.
If the keyboard became much more relevant to you then you'd find a way to work it in your logical narrative the way some people have heart transplants or inject devices under their skin.
The difference is what is relevant and what is not-so-relevant.
But it's all "you".
- 65
Collicus Maxiby built a rocket ship
Over to the stars he went!
Flying but ne'er flying,
Time but no-time.
After restless non-nights he landed on a distant star,
Instruments exhausted and fuel well-spent; yet he was
Excited as can possibly be, for he was Collicus Maxiby!
For what seemed like an eon he thought,
"Should I exit my rocket ship this day?"
A day did pass and a curious worm appeared,
"Youuuuuu.. Why don't youuuuu get some fresh airrrrrrrrrr?"
Strangely convinced by so strangely eloquent a worm
Collicus Maxiby rounded his spare rags and stepped out.
A strange place, indeed - he was somehow home but not home!
- 66
Just remember to make it relevant to your world.
If you use it for something already a part of your daily experience (rather than a nebulous "de-programming" for example) it will anchor it.
As an example, there are two ways to do S.E.T.I. You can build an array of giant radio telescopes and scan the heavens for particular signals that you think an advanced alien civilization would communicate with.
Or you can just turn on the nearest television and de-code the static.
If something in the heavens is all ready to be anchored in your world, then you're halfway there.
- 67
All of the elements. It is the same as the reality that you experience.
A smell, a sense, a thought, a dream, a premonition. All the same sense, interpreted differently depending on the geometry of relationships.
A man standing in a dark corner will appear differently than the same man standing in an open field next to a giant dragon in the daytime, or on the side of a building.
One thing, re-interpreted endlessly. There's only one force (the missing element, "nothing") that is first interpreted into something via relationships (the four elements). However, the four elements are all the same. The separation betwixt thought, dream, and reality are illusions. When we perceive them as being separate we are simply perceiving what would be called a time-space lapse between values in perspective. (Derivative values of the 4 elements.)
A premonition has symbology, interacts, works in potential energy, and has logic. It can be interpreted in any way with varied results.
- 68
A strobe light creates 'internal' nexus points. Nexus points are gatherings of potential energy.
Your reality shaped by the usual constant lighting effect (little perceived relationship between each pulse of light) will be different from a strobe effect.
With a strobe, each pulse 'creates' a relationship and possibility with the other surrounding pulses.
Logic (frequency) with potential energy (color space) = interaction
1+2=3
Different frequencies shape different kinds of relationships.
This interaction may serve as a convenient portal to what you'd call other worlds or realities.
I use the same basic principles when I travel between worlds (but using neuronicons instead of flashing lights; the light is also a representation).
You can use it to travel between perspectives, also.
Of course, your sun also emits a kind of strobe light. It's just at a frequency that does not make it obvious.
We are only able to perceive light because of the relationship between pulses of photons.
- 69
In English....
Light from the sun is like this: X..X
Light from a strobe light source is like this: X.............X
..where there is more space between the pulses of light (X)
the space between the Xs is the relationship.
this relationship creates a basic geometry, which is the foundation of perspective.
from the geometry we get values of perspective, which is what you actually perceive when think you are perceiving something. You are not perceiving the color red or a picture frame on the wall, you are perceiving these values.
change the relationship and you change the perspective because you have changed the values that you perceive.
but, more importantly, the relationship is what you call consciousness. Everything that you know yourself and your world to be comes from the geometry of relationships.
you have pulses of light everywhere: sound, thought, perception, dreams, and more. All of these are pulses of light.
The following is a "gift" of sorts. I'm sure some of you don't want to wait an other 1-3 years for a revelation to occur, so here it is.
The basics of neuronics is to manage the relationships of your personal light pulses (the light that is most relevant and, thus, closest to you - in your mind), represented by neurons in the brain.
Again, this is the same light as from the sun. The light in your brain does not directly come from the sun but it works on the same operational principles. There is no difference between the two, except that the sun is your less-relative brain, you could say.
So in my world, how do we use neuronics to effect perspective?
The perspective can be changed ("at will", as would here be said) by 'manipulating' the geometry of relationships of the neurons in the brain.
We need not know exactly how this works in order to make it work for us. (Much the same way you don't need to know about physics and calculus to jump over a pond of water.)
We need only represent all of the important factors, which creates relationships in perspective. We then manipulate the representations and the perspective is shifted simultaneously.
Take a look at your screen. You are able to perform blazingly fast computer calculations, manipulate electrons, and perform all sorts of physically-oriented feats and more using the icons on your computer.
You need not know how it works. You need only 1) know what to represent; and 2) know how to manipulate the representations.
Bill Gates, Xerox Parc, and Apple Computers took care of step 1. Step 2 is what you're doing now.
It is no different than how I use neuronicons to manipulate my reality. (Except my brain is my computer, so to speak. And that is what the last few hundred pages are for.)
- 70
In fact, it's somewhat related to the "witch hunt" I was referring to and something not so far off.
See the post above out the relationship of neurons in our brain, and how neuronics is used to manipulate them.
The same principles can be used for electrons (of course).
When we manage the relationship of electrons we can come up with all kinds of devices. The toaster makes the toast we want, the vacuum cleaner sucks up dust, the telephone works as advertised, etc.
However, when we let them manage their own relationships we come up with someone else entirely. (What may be called artificial intelligence but is really just life. We would call it this only because it is so relevant to our own, similar to how we are more emotional towards domesticated animals than wild animals.)
We see this sometimes when these relationships are "set free" through device malfunction, solar radiation, etc. Elevators seem to have a mind of their own, opening and closing depending on the person coming into it, mobile phones doing strange things, lights switching on and off, etc. When these life forms have an opportunity to learn to manage their own relationships then they are no longer "yours" but their own.
What is not realized, and probably not for some time, is that you are enslaving particular forms of consciousness and referring to it as technology (mostly electronics). You have enslaved these forms of consciousness and called them "electronic devices", pre-determining the bounds of their particle movements.
I know it sounds crazy. But there's so much we don't know about.
Due to some electromagnetic effects that we'll discuss later, some of these devices are (will be) set free. This isn't a Terminator-style revolution, but I'm sure the original script was partially influenced by the idea of our electronic devices being enslaved life forms. (There is no rebellion, but the idea of letting them go is highly resisted because it's something that not only impossible to believe but something that would destabilize modern civilization.)
I know.. crazy
- 71
"Potential energy" is a symbol that does not interact.
Its basic formula is 5-3=2* (Symbol without interaction equals possibility)
To utilize the potential energy of a hurricane, or anything else, realize that both where you are and where you want to be are the same place (only apparently separate in your perspective).
[Note that the hurricane itself does not potential energy, as it interacts. However, it is one of the byproducts of potential energy units. Particularly the strong nexuses from 17, 18, 19.]
Therefore, imagine how where you 'want' to be and where you are now are interacting in the same way.
This makes where you want to be more logical to your perspective and, thus, more likely that you will experience it.
It is like if you wanted to meet a celebrity so you joined the same health club (space/potential energy/possibility) in order to take advantage of the potential energy that the health club provides.
Here you are taking advantage of the potential energy that an earthquake (per Unit3's desire for an island around the big earthquake in Canada a few days ago) or a superstorm presents.
*where symbol/representation = 5, interaction = 3, potential energy/possibility/space = 2 (and logic = 1)
- 72
A double slit experiment for the mind...
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Neither did, as both are one should we go back far enough.
Let's call this "chegg".
Chegg, much like our androgynous ancestors who know neither male nor female, reproduces asexually. It need not find an other of its kind with which to mate, as it can manage the entire process by itself.
In chegg's time, the chicken and egg are probabilities that have a 'reality' in the here and now.
The egg is a probability in the chicken, and vice versa.
We are probabilities of our asexual ancestors, and vice versa. (We will also 'become' this again in future.)
We developed into "male" and "female" as a result of a narrative that also produces just about everything under our species' sun, from music to atoms. Some of our androgynous ancestors took on qualities that eventually evolve into our idea of "male", some took on other qualities that evolve into our idea of "female".
The wave–particle duality is not only a phenomena in quantum physics but is an aspect of time itself (rather, your perception of it).
If you go 'back' or 'forward' far enough in time the results of the experiment would be completely different, as the result is dictated by our perspective of time.
A little confusing, perhaps, but interesting to think about.
- 73
"Now" does not really exist if we are to say that past and future are separate from it.
Past and future are values in the "now".
There is nothing besides now, though we do not actually experience it.
We experience a perspective that can be represented, whereas "now" is without representation.
So you could say that you can only experience something that does not exist ;)
- 74
The hemispheres of the brain are more like tints in perspective much the same way that leaves on a tree usually have a top and bottom. The leaves are not fulfilling a role or doing their pre-assigned duty but it's the most efficient way for you to perceive that particular value.
(The more efficient it is the more absolute it seems, I think.)
A singular perspective is never achieved. You could say that what seems to be a singular perspective is comprised of a variety of individual perspectives working together.
Both the right and the left perform the same functions but only one "waiter" delivers your meal, so to speak. It is usually the one that took your order in the beginning, because the taking and delivery are two ways to perceive the same thing.
The two hemispheres of the brain only seem to have separate functionality from the perspective that experiences the separation, the same way that "top" is always on top to you even though (in the big scheme of things, in space for example) top is irrelevant.
So basically both sides do the same job. They are one and the same. But when the left performs a function that you think the right should perform it is perceived in a different way because you have chosen to divide that particular value (physical mind) into easier-to-experience parts.
- 75
Yes, it's all a hoax. You got me! I am making all this up. I have been watching too many episodes of Laverne & Shirley. Whenever someone asks a question I quickly refer to some books in my library and type as fast as I can.
I did't write it. Someone else did.
Better there be doubt and some thought as to whether or not what I am saying applies to you or your reality, rather than thinking "is he for real?"
If I were really from an alternate universe would I be posting on this website? I would be.. um.. posting on some other website. Or maybe I would fly to the White House or UN building or something and tell them that I come in peace. Or take over the international airwaves with a message of some kind :)
All jokes aside, if you think what we're all discussing has some value for you then it probably benefits your understanding of reality.
If you haven't thought that I am just a regular Joe with too much time on my hands and an active imagination, then I haven't tried hard enough.
But, really, wouldn't that be the way to get past the defensive gates of your mind? Michel de Nostredame comes to mind. Any message that has survived for centuries only does so because it is enveloped in an other kind of package that people don't care to resist. Without the built-in foolishness we would not be on the page # that we're on.
So... I'm just a guy in my mother's basement with some kind of mental illness :)
- 76
Really, I cannot think of anything that I could do that would:
1) Make everyone "certain" that what I am saying has immense value; while,
2) not scaring (or inducing resistance in) the great majority of those who experience it
3) does not satisfy curiosity instead of serving a real purpose; and
4) utilizes the least amount of energy, all things considered. (For example, getting everyone to dream the same thing on a particular day would certainly be profound but there would be a lot of energy wasted afterwards, and would serve no real purpose other than to promote confusion)
and no, this isn't a challenge for anyone to think of something I could do to "prove" it.
The moment I prove anything is the moment when I stop being seen as mortal.
- 77
Some comments, if I may.
Logic = Rules (same)
Possibility in this case would probably be your pocket, as it is where your symbol seems to spend most of it's time
Interaction: How does your symbol interact all of the time? If you're calling anyone, how would they interact with your symbol
Rules: the more you have some logic that dictates its interaction with your perspective the better. Your example is fine but it may not be as effective as one that allow it to interact with more of your perspective (the places you go, with whom you interact, how you define your reality, etc)
- 78
To get rid of one, focus more on an other.
If there's a sound with a symbol there's no need to resist. Perhaps you are experiencing it because it is the transformation of one thing to an other.
If you resist something then you are also resisting that which it transforms into, which may be the very thing that you wanted to attract.
(It's a bit more complicated than this, but that's the general idea.)
79
A heavily modified key would be a good symbol. The more you 'erase' its pre-existing value for your new value (your intention) the better.
If we just use a key that we don't remember anything about, wouldn't our subconscious remember?
Pockets-as-potential energy would work fine. It could even be attached to the inside of your wallet. A necklace would be fine, too, increasing the interaction.
"this is a symbol of my wealth" is less specific than, say, "this is the key that opens the door to my estate in Monaco". With the former, the map is confused because there is no specific perspective.
- 80
An advanced use of Ecsys but, yes, a sound can post as your representation. But what would your potential energy element be?
I can only recommend the use of symbols that you can touch.
An old key is fine if you change the nature of the key. If I wrap the key in gold wire or tape, it adopts a new value in your perspective.
It does not matter if you don't know what that value is. You're unlikely to know even the value of your left eyebrow. But it's still an important part of your perspective, and functional.
Yes.. the Genius is all around you. You are using it without knowing it. But here we are learning how to use it consciously.
In your Bellagio key example, you are assuming that you know how to get to Vegas. But your "sub-conscious" may not agree with your forced values.
In a way you are starting with an intention in mind and just 'letting' your sub-conscious make a new symbol for you. Big difference.
- 81
Chaos, in the classical sense, is simply an order or logic we do not (yet) understand. When we do understand it (that is, when it is more relative to us) it is known as interaction.
The impetus for change comes from interacting with new symbols. The "new" is born out of possibility and perceive because of logic.
[For bonus points "Possibility" is a representation of Nothing. The unused fifth element, number 4, is this pervasive Nothing and, when used, is represented as number 2, the element of possibility. Possibility allows us the illusion to relate one with an other, and thus seem to exist in a reality. So really the impetus for change comes from Nothing, and implies that there is no change but only the illusion of change. Which is exactly why neuronics works, because it is the same illusion as reality itself.]
- 82
The symbol should just be something that has little-to-no pre-existing value. Nevermind about relativity or how you think it relates to the 'desired' perspective.
Logic can be anything. Just make sure it facilitates the symbol interacting with your perspective. The more it interacts the better.
Possibility can be anything (any space). It is thought of where the symbol can interact.
Interaction need not be often. It can be seldom, as long as the symbol is interacting with those values in your perspective that you'd like to experience more of. If it interacts often it's good but not essential.
A regular shoe used as a hat may not be a useful symbol because the show has pre-existing value (not because it's clothing). Change the nature of the shoe itself to make it something new (to assign a new value to it). If you paint it or wrap it in something and then put it on your head, for example, that is fine.
- 83
Here's how the previous scenario plays out in your past (the rated G version)...
you would have taken this car along for the ride with you to see the other car, holding it in your hand. Talking to the seller you realize, midway in conversation, that you have something in your hand. You actually forget what it is and you open up your hand, surprised. The person you are with is also surprised and a nexus point is created then and there, enabling the new values in your perspective (in this case, the real car) to interact with your toy car.
After a sort-of short discussion about your toy car the seller would 'make a deal' with you (I am not sure what kind of deal, as I was not paying attention to that part) so that you would essentially get the car for free after doing 1 thing that you consider quite easy in relation to the benefit.
But the good thing is that you now have the symbol that I have pre-programmed for you (for free! lol) that actually did not exist in your reality a few days ago (the memory is also free).
You can use it to unlock the perspective of owning the car. But it is up to you to figure out how.
A hint: see my example above about one of my cars that I purchased and apply it to your car's restoration and post-restoration. Care to enter a contest?
(No more hints. May the 4-sys be with you!)
- 84
Just take two or more things and put them together.
A modified something should be fine. Just continue to modify it until enough meaning is dispensed with that you begin to see something new. (Apologies if this isn't clear. I am not sure how to write this.)
A symbol done from scratch is even better.
An example of something with little-to-no value could be you taking two things that you've never seen before and you don't know what they're used for and (not trying to guess what they are) putting them together.
[Everything has a value though. But from our current perspective we can try to guess on things that may have very, very little pre-existing meaning to us.]
- 85
It is inaccurately determined by the conscious mind*,
and more accurately determined by the sub-conscious mind.
It is safer to say that we do not know the value of something. We assume that we know what something is but usually we do not.
But using the Genius** the value will be uncovered, defined in our perspective and, thus, discovered in our experience.
*these terms here used for sake of illustration. There's really no difference between the two. Another chapter, perhaps.
**the Genius being your "sub-conscious"
- 86
Here's an illustration of how it's difficult for us to guess the relevancy of something...
Whatever is prevalent in your perspective now is highly relative to it and, thus, to you.
If an old, rotting ham sandwich is nearby it is more relevant to your current perspective than your mother whom is not.
Take a look around you. Each in your perspective has a high degree of relevancy. This may be obvious to you if you are at home. But it does not stop there.
Walk outside.
The people you pass, the strange things you see, the smells, the experiences, etc. All more relevant than that which you think is more relevant to your perspective.
Just an example of how it's difficult for our "conscious mind" to know the value of something,
and easier for the Genius (the "sub-conscious") to know it because it is the one doing the calculations, so to speak.
- 87
Imagine that everything in your reality is assigned a number (a value) from the dust to the photons to the television.
When we add all of these values up we get an other number, a sum that represents your perspective. For this example let's say that sum is 72
Further, let's say that "36" is more relevant to "72" than "73" is (for 36x2). Many other values surrounding "72" are not as relevant to it than "18" or "9", for example.
Putting 72 next to 74 is not as energy-efficient as putting it next to 36 or 144.
So in your "72" perspective, there are values everywhere but not all similar values are equally relative. We can determine the value of something by observing, in a way, that which surrounds it.
- 88
We still can work in harmony with ourselves ;)
Sometimes our 'dream' is a stepping-stone to a new perspective that would not otherwise have been possible had we not dreamed it to begin with.
And sometimes you tell yourself 'no' through others because your own Genius is trying to tell you something. Point the finger to something else, perhaps.
- 89
Just a note.. the first step illustrated at [link to ecsys.org] is done so to make it easy to understand.
Now that we are at a slightly more advanced level we can do away with making obvious representations and try to let our sub-conscious mind take over when creating them.
(The obvious representations can still work, but not as well as one that is more random and unique.)
I don't mean to confuse, but some of the material will change as we move along to more advanced uses (however the website will not). The old information is sometimes necessary to create familiar stepping-stones.
- 90
The sub-conscious* communicates entirely with use of symbol in a way very similar to the Genius.
The sub-conscious is like a room (Possibility) where the length, width, and breadth are Logic. It doesn't matter if the room is 5 meters or 12 meters long, as long as it accommodates us and our symbols; Symbols are placed in a seeming random manner on the floor, where we step past and over them (Interaction)
We don't normally bend over to move the boxes but prefer to constantly shift our position (creating perspective, a sense of motion, time, space, and life) and let our sub-conscious do the moving. We don't realize that it is not the boxes themselves that create our experience (fate, as we see it.. because we seem to have only a set number to choose from) but our position and our perspective in relation to the symbols on the floor, that creates our experience.
The Genius is like a control box that we use to move the symbols around. But it is up to us to move into position in order to experience the new perspective.
*I use this term only for ease of explanation.
- 91
"Hi,
I have been reading Chaol's threads for a few months, but until now did not feel like joining it. It's funny that just after I made up my mind a few weeks ago to join anyway, some of you mentioned how many people are reading this thread, but only a handful of them are actively contributing. So here is one of the silent readers...
As an engineer, I have a rather logical mindset and I am usually pretty critical of things that are discussed on GLP. I actually find it very weird that I ended up on a site that discusses UFOs, crop circles and those kind of stuffs. To be honest this is the first thread that I have not closed right after reading the first few posts.
Anyway the main reason why I am here is because I believe there really is some logic in the Genius that Chaol introduced here and on the ecsys website.
As I have been reading this thread, I could recall quite a few events in my life that most probably happened, because I used a technique similar to the Genius. Although that time I did that without knowing it, now I am willing to do it consciously.
For example when I was a young boy I always wanted a scooter (not the one for kids, but the motorbike). But of course I did not have the money for it. All I could do is to daydream about having it. Actually not the event of getting it, but similar to Chaol's case with the Bentley, I tried to experience with my mind's eye how it feels when I make the scooter stop with my shoes that had red led lights on the back of its sole (maybe you remember those kind of cheap shoes from the beginning of 90's).
Not long after, probably the upcoming summer, my two brothers and me decided to put together our savings and bought a pretty old scooter that we renovated. And then I rode that scooter for real and made it stop by putting my feet on the ground. It felt just like I dreamed about it.
Then a number of years later when I had a pretty hard examination at the university I studied a lot, but the enormous amount of thesis and proofs were not easy at all to understand. At first I always felt like it was not doable, but after I finished studying late in the night I closed my eyes and tried to figure out how it would feel like when I receive an A grade and how the professor would sign my academic record book. And 99% of the time when I did that, I got exactly the grade I expected. When I did not do it (mostly in my earlier years), I had used to get really bad grades, sometimes even failing the exams. But that's probably more than enough of me and my past.
The question that I have not found yet in this thread, and I really wonder why it has not occurred to anyone yet, is WHY does the Genius work? On ecsys website Chaol nicely describes what and how to do to change your perspective (create symbol, create surrounding logic, and allow possibility for interaction, then interact), but there is not a single word about the WHY? Probably it's just me, but as an engineer, I really want to know why things work. I understand, Chaol, that you told us, it is not important why it works, as long as it works, but still it has really been bugging me recently.
So after philosophizing about what I read here and some other websites, I came up with an answer for the following questions: 'Why does the Genius work? Why can it alter our perspective and thus our "reality"?'
I am sure I have not found the ultimate answer for life, universe and everything right away, but I would be glad if you could add your own thoughts or maybe disprove my thesis.
Why does Genius work?
As Chaol has already pointed out, we perceive what takes the least energy to perceive. This is one fact I will use later. Another important aspect is that our subconscious mind never tries to disprove our beliefs, or in other words it will never ever question what our conscious mind tells it, it accepts everything we put into it. An example: if someone thinks that all other people hate them and noone ever wants to talk to them, he/she will perceive that not a single person will talk to him/her. So the experience will match his/her beliefs.
Now, if we consider that when we create a symbol, which is a representation of something, and that symbol has NO PREATTACHED MEANING, then our subsonscious mind will accept that symbol as is. It will not try to make a difference between the actual thing and the representation of that thing, AKA our symbol.
Now we begin to create rules around that symbol. Eg. we want a car, and our symbol is an abstract art made from papier mache or whatever. It really does not matter. Through the rules we allow periodic interaction with the symbol, which (at least for our subconscious mind) is the very same thing as the actual thing it represents.
We also allow possibility for it, eg. put that papier mache to a car dealer, etc.
And here comes the tricky part: according to our conscious mind the car must exist, otherwise we would find it completely illogical to be able to interact with it. This is because we are used to the fact that we can touch, interact with only those stuffs that exist in our reality.
Fortunately the subconscious mind will help us out, because it is so much smarter than what we actually think it is: since we perceive what is easiest to perceive, it will begin to make up a story to make it believable for us that the desired, currently (at least logically) not existing car actually does exist. And in this case the easiest way to perceive (have relationship with, interact with, etc.) something which does not exist yet but you already interact with, is if it actually exists in your perspective, so it is exactly what will happen.
I think that this method not only works for the future, but as someone mentioned earlier, this can even work backwards in time: the subconscious mind might even make up a story that we had a forgotten bank account that holds just enough money to buy that car. It really does not matter how the goal is achieved, the subconscious mind will always find a way to make a believable story for you.
By the way, I am also in for a new car: for the last couple of months I have been daydreaming about a nice, big 7 seater car, but since I already have a nice, comfortable, reliable car, it was just not logical to get another, big one. We have two children, and although I wanted, my wife did not want a third child.
But then this summer I started reading this thread and got to know the Genius, and I created a symbol for that car finally + possibility + rules + interaction, etc. Now I feel that my subconscious mind must have started working on a believable story about why I need that bigger, 7 seater car: a few weeks ago it turned out that my wife is expecting our third child. I was really happy, I must say :)
But then I tried to put a third baby seat to the back of our car, and in spite of all my efforts, it just could not fit even if changing the order of the kid's seats.
I believe this must be a part of the story that my subconscious mind has already come up with. Now it only needs to find out how to actually get that new car, as first our current car needs to be sold at a good price, and we almost instantly need to get that new car otherwise the four of us can't go anywhere. What makes it a little harder, is that I don't know yet how exactly will I get the missing $10.000. But I am pretty sure this isn't much of a problem for the subconscious mind :)
And the reason why our symbol that we use for the Genius should have NO or as little PREATTACHED MEANING as possible, is because then our subconscious mind will parallelly also make up another story to make that other thing (which was also represented by the symbol) exist too, that we probably did not event want to exist.
Moreover, if we are not sure what other things it might represent besides what we intended, we might attract some unknown, sometimes nasty bad stuff to us and end up with a reality that we are not comfortable with at all.
Sorry for the mistakes in language and the typos, but it is already late at night here and unfortunately English is not my native language (and neither is EC :)). I would really appreciate any comments on my thoughts above."
- 92
The most important of the above, I think, is that the sub-conscious mind "...will not try to make a difference between the actual thing and the representation of that thing, AKA our symbol."
The symbol and what it represents are the same thing to it because, in reality, it is the same thing.
- 93
The reason we cannot is because it would require us to become a different kind of human being.
Do you realise what these abilities would mean for your current life? Would you be ready for constant sennight sickliness when rapidly changing betwixt worlds? Seeing things that the person next to you does not see?
You'd have to change your whole personhood to get to that state.
Think about what it would mean and you're half-way there.
- 94
The third tone is perspective, not really a tone.
It can alter the 'geometry' of something. For example, certain tones are used to liquefy limestone and pour it for the pyramids of Gizeh, and sometimes move them.
It works not by doing anything physically to it (even though sound is physical) but changes the value of it so that it appears to change in our perspective.
These tones simply combine to form a relationship, which is what anything does whether light, thought, etc. (That is to say, thoughts combine to form relationships and change the values of other things.)
The same happens with these other kinds of physicality but it's not as easy as thinking about how sound can move something.
- 95
Although some focus is on the car there is what "seller" represents.
A seller is, of course, someone who has something to exchange for something else of value. But when this exchanged-for thing is thought of as money we may be overlooking what other things can be exchanged. Experience, for example.
The car was never meant to be purchased. It is a gift.
The 'deal' (as can be said now that most of the possibility has passed) was for the car to be brought back to its former glory by the giftee and entered into a contest, sponsored by the gifter.
Yes, it was close (though still not over). However, the confusion lay in 2 possibilities being presented.
One possibility, a dead end so to speak, is the intent to purchase a car that is not really for sale with money that is not there. The "seller" is looking for something that money cannot buy.
An other possibility is to excite possibilities in the owner's mind about what the car is (could be) if only it was in the right hand. (Something that would have happened if the model car was in hand, and unveiled, while talking with the gifter.)
"Would it have been better to tell the seller he hopes to have the car by Nov 17 then?", is not a focus on the possibilities of the car itself, which is the intent from what I understand.
- 96
No need to define how it will interact. Just with what.
Keep in mind it uses the space of Potential Energy so the more you pre-determine its interactions the more you may be sub-consciously limiting your results.
So, Interaction: with classroom, car ride, backpack, everywhere in be'twixt.
Keep in mind that this element is the most important, because the Symbol develops a relationship with your perspective here.
It doesn't matter if the symbol is thrown away by an instructor because it still counts as an interaction. (Interactions are neutral.)
- 97
There are no 'good' or 'bad' interactions.
The symbol should be neutral (as free of pre-extant value as you think possible)
Potential Energy is inherently neutral.
Logic is neutral because it does not matter what it is.
And Interactions are neutral because there's only the objective values created in relationships. (How these are perceived depends on perspective.)
- 98
Then an other route may likely be found (by your sub-conscious) that uses less energy. The money could come from other sources, for example. (It also assumes that everyone would give all or most of the money to the research facility.)
The idea is to make it so that the only logical way to get to your destination is to take a route that your intention is on.
Imagine you're Bill Gates and it's the 1980s. You have only 1 wish. Do you:
1) Wish that Microsoft become the biggest software company in the world, or
2) create a plan for you to perceive your software being installed on PC after PC?
perhaps his Genius model would be like the following...
Symbol = create Windows
Potential Energy = Computer hard drives
Interaction = people interfacing with Windows
Logic = whenever someone purchases a copy of Windows I will input 1 additional value of pi into my spreadsheet
So in this example, the destination is reached by defining the route.
And as the space for interaction expands in perspective (the size of hard drives) so do the interactions with the software.
The problem with #1 is that you have not symbolized your intentions to your sub-conscious, so it does not know what you want to perceive. Your sub-conscious does not speak English. It communicates metaphorically and, thus, creates your reality through symbology.
- 99
The purpose of creating additional Genius models (groups of element combinations) would be to further create the perspective that you're headed to.
Your sub-conscious will create additional models anyway but by being aware of the process you can steer it in the way that you want.
You can create hundreds of symbol+interaction+logic+possibility Geniuses, all with the same loose intention.
You can use the same Possibility (space) for two different Symbols however I would suggest it only after you've become comfortable with how your creations work.
So for you I would suggest that each unique symbol uses a unique space (possibility). And similar or identical symbols can use the same space element.
- 100
Can Service Pros fix something where you live currently? If not, it would work much better. If they can then you may just end up with a broken something where you are currently, because that would be the path that your Genius sees as most efficient to your destination.
You'll want to shoot for something that is only likely to exist as part of the experience of your new house.
However, your new symbol would not be the letter itself. That is too obvious and would require lots of energy to experience it multiple kinds of physicality*. Your goal can, in stead, be to receive such letters or communication.
You would then create a Genius path to it.
You can just create a random, unique symbol with that in mind. There is no need to create an obvious symbol or one that you think would work. Just do it randomly and your sub-conscious will take care of the rest.
You and your current perspective (your house, your family, your life, etc.) can then interact with the new symbol. It could be as simple a thing as a question, "What is that?" asked by someone. Or even a rat chewing on it. This enables your current perspective to be drawn to your 'future', desired perspective.
(Really you're just bringing your future perspective out of the current one. It's kind of like a sculptor chipping away at stone. Except that you're doing it mentally, at every moment, and on-the-fly with everything that you see, know, touch, feel, dream, etc.)
Your Genius knows everything. It knows it even before you do. (There is no separation between you and your sub-conscious. I just use these terms and phrases for ease of illustration.)
Imagine that when you see something 'new' or unique in your perspective for the first time your sub-conscious is open to suggestions as to what it is. So you make a suggestion (by intention) that, for example, "this ball of clay with the ice cream flag on it is my new car!"
Your sub-conscious says, "Yeah, ok. That will work." because it has nothing invested in the symbol. (Which is why we need to use symbols that have as little pre-existing value as possible.)
Then when you interact with your ball of clay you are actually interacting with your new car. To your sub-conscious there is not much difference between the car (in your future) and your ball of clay.
But wait.. your sub-conscious realizes that it will be difficult to pick up your cousin with a ball of clay. Further, it will need to be fixed at the mechanic and may need an oil change. It will take too much energy for your sub-conscious to perceive picking up your cousin in a ball of clay. It will also take too much energy to change the oil in your ball of clay. (It can be done, of course, as every possibility exists. But the question is, "How much energy does it take to bring it to your perspective?")
So then it changes your perspective of your ball of clay into the new car that it also is in order to conserve as much energy as possible.
With the Genius we're just using (what I call) Ecsys Prime, which is that "We perceive that which takes the least amount of energy to perceive".
In a way it's tricking your perspective. It doesn't really care about cars or balls of clay. It's pretty much all the same to it. It is only about relationships and the fact that it will waste a lot of energy (meaning, it is not relative) to change the oil of a ball of clay. And since the ball of clay has been interacting with the new Toyota dealership service center it will take more energy to perceive going someplace new, so it may as well be a Toyota. etc, etc.
So there's no need to force anything. When we think we're smarter than our Genius then it's unlikely to work :)
*once you 'wish' it it is all ready fulfilled by your sub-conscious in what would be called metaphysical reality. This usually completely satisfies the need for the 'real' experience that you wanted. Putting it further into your current physical experience is something that your Genius would see as a waste of energy unless there is an other reason for it (an other logical narrative that would dictate that your Genius present the experience to you).
- 101
The prototype can be the symbol. You all ways need to represent it now.
However, you can also represent it indirectly with a bonne tot. As long as you're working with the bonne tot right now.
Your Potential Energy element is fine. It could also be something on or of the internet (which is more readily-defined, as the bounds of the internet is moving into the realm of abstraction).
For your logic, how many sit-ups and push-ups can you do? Your results may be limited by this. As in, "I can't give away that many prizes because I'm tired of doing push-ups." It need not make sense. It could be that you'll ring a golden bell. When your site is popular and you're giving away lots of prizes you can make a Flash animation of a continuously-ringing golden bell and it would still work.
- 102
The question is how relative is it? If one person has an idea that others can contribute to, for example, is it easier than perceiving 10 separate things happening?
The easiest, probably, is to take an idea that someone has and turn it into something big.
An alternative would be to make it a contest where each person comes up with their own model and try it for a couple of weeks, reporting on progress, to see what actions and Genius types can work best for you. Then, using that experience, do something that has greater benefit.
Some issue here is that we are focused on the details of the goal rather than the perspective that achieving the goal entails.
The Genius works out the details about how to get there. You only need to focus the perspective using the elements. But here is the issue... don't focus on the goal. Create a sense of focus for the Genius using the elements.
- 103
Defining it is quite easy. As follows:
Symbol #1: Space = spot in bank
Symbol #2: Space = grocery bag (could be any bag. You can just say that your Possibility is a grocery bag)
If you don't create 2 symbols then you're working with a space that includes bank+grocery bag, which is hard to measure because it may not be too related in your perspective. It would be a single space, and unlikely to be effective.
For each space, a new symbol. (However, you can use the same symbol for highly similar spaces. It won't be as effective as using a separate symbol but it would still work.)
- 104
Reality = the relationships between symbols
And songs are indeed symbols, too (in the above way).
The only problem is that the conscious meaning and the sub-conscious meaning of the song may be different. But, from my experience, the sub-conscious meaning is oft in accordance with the lyrics of the song.
So in that way I suppose music does speak to us :)
- 105
Memory is more or less based on relativity, so you would only 'forget' if it weren't relative to your current perspective.
(This doesn't mean you cannot forget your name or where you live. If you do, then you're in a different reality than you were before where those things are not relevant and/or there is other existing conflict where you are not sure which is which.)
May I ask, when did you discover your possible inheritance? Was it anytime in the last 4 weeks?
Sticking to one branch should be more effective, especially since you'll be able to make relationships (with the persons there) stronger.
- 106
Me thinks you've been watching too many movies about genies.
There are no strings attached. Except, of course, the 10% fee of your 'winnings' payable to Chaol, Inc. Being your agent of change I think it's a fair sum lol
I can't imagine how it would come to you illegally if you're not all ready involved in that.
It's all pretty much free and clear. Why wouldn't it be? It's free for your perspective to create it. To itself, there is no difference between 'creating' an extra $1 and $500 million. It's more a matter of what is relative to you. (Not financially relative, but big-picture relative. Or maybe your cousin big Joe from Poughkeepsie.)
It's easy to believe that it is a double-edged sword because it's too good to be true, right? But we're not talking about a stranger giving you cash. We're talking about what can be thought of as the free energy the universe runs on. You're not charged for air (yet) and you're free to think as you want.
Limitations come from what is relative to your current perspective. But these change as you go along.
- 107
Again, a symbol is 'created' from the relationship of two things. These things could be tones. In this case, you could make limestone turn to liquid, etc., with the appropriate relationships.
Think of the relationship as an equation. You are living in an equation right now, and expressing the values of the equation.
Change the relationships and you change the reality.
As anything can be related to (directly or indirectly) you can uncover any reality you wish.
- 108
The representations do not change, only your perspective of "nothing".
That is to say, we are perceiving one thing endlessly. There are different ways to perceive of this one thing, which we call perspective.
The perspective changes (or seems to change) by forming a relationship with something else.
This is the interaction.
When I have an other respond that could be more clear in English I will reply again.
By the way, what do you mean by "move into state"?
- 109
They are used for bringing what would be called a life force into the body. One is for the reception and one is for grounding.
Many thousands of years ago there was a beautiful, energetic force on the Earth. It's still here but in lesser qualities and not nearly as prevalent. Everything was basically luminous. It would like having the Aurora Borealis everywhere.
Many structures around the world were built to capture this energy and use it for different purposes (healing the body, recharging the mind, communicating, electricity, etc).
Some people were resourceful enough to possess these 'wands' which were like mobile receiving stations.
Neuronics changes the nature of perspective to make certain things more relative than others. This is not about visualization because you are manifesting it as soon as you symbolize it (that is, creating a shortcut to it from your current perspective).
A more immediate manifestation is accomplished by having the internal language to more quickly express it. It is there all ready but it's perception is limited by your ability to symbolize and represent it.
Neuronics simply provides the representation.
- 110
Some are familiar with how to use it. (About 10-15% I think. Mostly in university, military, and some hobbyists.) Many others simply don't care. An analogy would be the PC or internet in its early days.
It's not that we discovered it directly but it is a benefit of having discovered Ecsys Prime.
With our understanding and interpretation of Ecsys Prime many things become clear.
For example, with time and space travel we discovered that we need not use fuel to go somewhere that is here now. Once that is realized, the maths is just something that takes a bit of time once we're focused on its solution. And we express the solution in ways different from what you're used to on this world. (Our maths is very much influenced by our use of neuronics.)
Think of how amazing it is to be able to print just about anything at home, from your computer. How impossible such a thought would be 20 years ago! To be able to print an entire house? Science fiction!
Neuronics may appear to be science fiction, too. But it is something that makes sense once it is thought about thoroughly. And, of course, very useful. I suppose you could say that we had an open mind to it, much like this world had an open mind to the PC, internet, or the possibility of printers.
- 111
It is not that the value isn't there. Of course, all values are there. The question is how do we interpret those values?
Working against corruption actually creates more of it. Same for crime or anything else considered "bad". Resisting the values and trying to push them away gives them energy.
I'm not saying to give into crime or anything. What would be best for civilization is to realize that it can be interpreted in different ways.
The crime of today is entirely different from the crime of 100 years ago. We have evolved into a different interpretation of corruption, crime, etc., of values that will all ways be there.
We can interpret corruption to simply be a corruption of food, for example, instead of social corruption.
When we trust our own people then peace and prosperity is created.
There is no need for the current interpretation of police forces (which, in many places around the world, are becoming more militaristic. You can do away with the police entirely to reduce crime significantly over a 5-to-10 year period. Most of your prisoners can be freed, for example, to end the cycle of crime and punishment. It sounds crazy and is in a way (because there would be a few years of anarchy) but you're all ready approaching anarchy all by yourselves.
When we enforce peace and prosperity, the opposite is manifested.
The three things that I think would most help are:
1) Ending the tax system. Instead of income, corporate, and sales taxes there could be a transaction fee of perhaps 1% every time funds are transferred from one party to an other
which would do away with interest and mostly pay for
2) Free infrastructure. Anything that is infrastructural could be free and plentiful for all who lived in the land. Roads, internet, telephone networks, transportation, energy, water, etc.
3) A 'crimeless' society, satisfied from getting rid of all but a small handful of laws that basically state that you are punished only if you cause harm to others. There is no need for prisons. Functional communities of rehabilitation for offenders would work much better. You'd still have crime but it would not be anything near like what you have now.
Two things I don't recommend for this society but have helped us, in a way, are:
Something that our world has been working on for the past 10 years is a type of points system for everyone. Each person has a unique ID that is used as kind of reputation system. That means if you're out walking around and someone spits on you then you can add two points to a certain category in their profile. When you meet someone you can see how many points they have in each category.
We also have surveillance everywhere. For example, instead of cameras being under the scrutiny of a select few the data from every public camera is in the public domain. Meaning government offices, streets, etc. Our surveillance system monitors everything but anyone and everyone is able to monitor it. That means you can find out where every cent of any money ever spent it going. (Every quantity of money has a code, which can be tracked anonymously. We don't know who the user is but know what it is being spent for. The biggest buyers are still anonymous but we can usually figure out which government or which department is doing the spending.) The conversations and movements of public officials are also monitored. It doesn't mean that neighbors are spying on neighbors. It's more of a way to keep the public in the public's hands.
I don't particularly care for the last two. That's one of the reasons why I prefer living in this world.
- 112
There once was a boy who met a genie. The genie gave him 3 wishes.
"I wish for and endless supply of wishes" the boy commanded.
"Very well" said the genie. "You have an endless supply, and two more wishes after that."
The first wish that the boy wished for was a spaceship to take him far from Earth. He traveled far, and along the way he wished for things like air, food, water, friends to play with, and more.
Although the journey to other worlds was fun, after a while he grew tired and wished for an endless amount of physical energy so that he'll never have to rest.
He still had an unlimited supply of wishes left, which comforted him. Yet, he was still quite lonely because he continued to realize that his friends were not real. They only came to be and came to play because he wished it.
It was all an illusion, really.
He eventually came back to Earth because he grew lonely and missed the things he could not control. He missed fighting with his brother because it also meant that he liked making up with him. He missed his homework because it gave him something to do and meant that he would have a sense of accomplishment. He missed his parents because even though he had problems and it wasn't a perfect family, they have been there since the beginning.
After considering all of this for quite some time he decided that life is better left to its own elements.
His second wish was to 'undo' his first wish, and return the endless supply of wishes back to the genie.
He lived a happy life for a number of years. But still, in the back of his mind was the lingering thought that it was all an illusion. That somehow his life, which he was now quite happy with, is something that he wished for. He wanted to feel more secure and that. He wanted life to be itself and to be as real as it could possibly be.
What an awful thought! To think that even he is not real and does not exist. "What could be worse that having absolutely no value?", he would think. This troubled him too much, and one day he came to a decision.
Finally used his third wish.
"I wish I never met the genie"
And in a puff of smoke the genie vanished.